Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27361, 'title' => 'Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. </p> <p align="justify"> But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member. </p> <p align="justify"> Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. </p> <p align="justify"> But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed. </p> <p align="justify"> The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. </p> <p align="justify"> This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. </p> <p align="justify"> In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150225/jsp/frontpage/story_5376.jsp#.VO06AS7xxpA', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675412, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27361, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot;</p><p align="justify">&quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27361, 'title' => 'Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. </p> <p align="justify"> But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member. </p> <p align="justify"> Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. </p> <p align="justify"> But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed. </p> <p align="justify"> The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. </p> <p align="justify"> This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. </p> <p align="justify"> In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150225/jsp/frontpage/story_5376.jsp#.VO06AS7xxpA', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675412, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27361 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot;</p><p align="justify">&quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an "informal" meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">"As far as possible", none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be "diluted", the sources added.</p><p align="justify">"The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?" asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the "anti-farmer" and "pro-industry" labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: "Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare."</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were "signs of genuine ferment" among the peasants, "we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?"</p><p align="justify">"So far, we have not sensed any such thing," he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: "The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy."</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27361, 'title' => 'Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. </p> <p align="justify"> But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member. </p> <p align="justify"> Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. </p> <p align="justify"> But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed. </p> <p align="justify"> The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. </p> <p align="justify"> This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. </p> <p align="justify"> In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150225/jsp/frontpage/story_5376.jsp#.VO06AS7xxpA', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675412, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27361, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot;</p><p align="justify">&quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27361, 'title' => 'Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. </p> <p align="justify"> But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member. </p> <p align="justify"> Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. </p> <p align="justify"> But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed. </p> <p align="justify"> The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. </p> <p align="justify"> This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. </p> <p align="justify"> In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150225/jsp/frontpage/story_5376.jsp#.VO06AS7xxpA', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675412, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27361 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot;</p><p align="justify">&quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an "informal" meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">"As far as possible", none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be "diluted", the sources added.</p><p align="justify">"The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?" asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the "anti-farmer" and "pro-industry" labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: "Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare."</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were "signs of genuine ferment" among the peasants, "we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?"</p><p align="justify">"So far, we have not sensed any such thing," he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: "The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy."</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9362eb0537-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27361, 'title' => 'Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. </p> <p align="justify"> But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member. </p> <p align="justify"> Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. </p> <p align="justify"> But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed. </p> <p align="justify"> The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. </p> <p align="justify"> This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. </p> <p align="justify"> In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150225/jsp/frontpage/story_5376.jsp#.VO06AS7xxpA', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675412, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27361, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot;</p><p align="justify">&quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27361, 'title' => 'Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. </p> <p align="justify"> But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member. </p> <p align="justify"> Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. </p> <p align="justify"> But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed. </p> <p align="justify"> The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. </p> <p align="justify"> This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. </p> <p align="justify"> In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150225/jsp/frontpage/story_5376.jsp#.VO06AS7xxpA', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675412, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27361 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an &quot;informal&quot; meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;As far as possible&quot;, none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be &quot;diluted&quot;, the sources added.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?&quot; asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; and &quot;pro-industry&quot; labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: &quot;Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were &quot;signs of genuine ferment&quot; among the peasants, &quot;we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?&quot;</p><p align="justify">&quot;So far, we have not sensed any such thing,&quot; he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: &quot;The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy.&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an "informal" meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">"As far as possible", none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be "diluted", the sources added.</p><p align="justify">"The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?" asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the "anti-farmer" and "pro-industry" labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: "Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare."</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were "signs of genuine ferment" among the peasants, "we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?"</p><p align="justify">"So far, we have not sensed any such thing," he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: "The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy."</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27361, 'title' => 'Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. </p> <p align="justify"> But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday night, at an "informal" meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. </p> <p align="justify"> "As far as possible", none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be "diluted", the sources added. </p> <p align="justify"> "The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?" asked a board member. </p> <p align="justify"> Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the "anti-farmer" and "pro-industry" labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. </p> <p align="justify"> But a senior minister asked: "Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare." </p> <p align="justify"> The minister added that if there were "signs of genuine ferment" among the peasants, "we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?" </p> <p align="justify"> "So far, we have not sensed any such thing," he claimed. </p> <p align="justify"> The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. </p> <p align="justify"> This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. </p> <p align="justify"> In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: "The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy." </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150225/jsp/frontpage/story_5376.jsp#.VO06AS7xxpA', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675412, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27361, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an "informal" meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">"As far as possible", none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be "diluted", the sources added.</p><p align="justify">"The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?" asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the "anti-farmer" and "pro-industry" labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: "Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare."</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were "signs of genuine ferment" among the peasants, "we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?"</p><p align="justify">"So far, we have not sensed any such thing," he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: "The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy."</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27361, 'title' => 'Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. </p> <p align="justify"> But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday night, at an "informal" meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. </p> <p align="justify"> "As far as possible", none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be "diluted", the sources added. </p> <p align="justify"> "The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?" asked a board member. </p> <p align="justify"> Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the "anti-farmer" and "pro-industry" labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. </p> <p align="justify"> But a senior minister asked: "Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare." </p> <p align="justify"> The minister added that if there were "signs of genuine ferment" among the peasants, "we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?" </p> <p align="justify"> "So far, we have not sensed any such thing," he claimed. </p> <p align="justify"> The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. </p> <p align="justify"> This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. </p> <p align="justify"> BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. </p> <p align="justify"> In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: "The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy." </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150225/jsp/frontpage/story_5376.jsp#.VO06AS7xxpA', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-tests-nerves-on-land-law-battle-radhika-ramaseshan-4675412', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675412, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27361 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Ordinance,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers.</p><p align="justify">Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014.</p><p align="justify">BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition.</p><p align="justify">But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago.</p><p align="justify">On Monday night, at an "informal" meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said.</p><p align="justify">"As far as possible", none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be "diluted", the sources added.</p><p align="justify">"The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?" asked a board member.</p><p align="justify">Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the "anti-farmer" and "pro-industry" labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak.</p><p align="justify">But a senior minister asked: "Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare."</p><p align="justify">The minister added that if there were "signs of genuine ferment" among the peasants, "we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?"</p><p align="justify">"So far, we have not sensed any such thing," he claimed.</p><p align="justify">The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers.</p><p align="justify">This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation.</p><p align="justify">BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace.</p><p align="justify">The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects.</p><p align="justify">In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha.</p><p align="justify">Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: "The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy."</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Centre tests nerves on land law battle -Radhika Ramaseshan |
-The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre has tabled a land acquisition bill with provisions identical to that of a controversial ordinance, taking a calculated gamble and testing the nerves of the Opposition that is hoping to build a campaign anchored on farmers. Tabled in the Lok Sabha this morning, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill is based entirely on the ordinance the Union cabinet had cleared in December 2014. BJP ally Shiv Sena tonight said it would not support the bill and fence-sitter Biju Janata Dal has expressed strong reservations. The government also offered to hold talks with the Opposition. But the mood in the government till this evening appeared to be against making too many changes although it had hinted at accommodating Opposition concerns two days ago. On Monday night, at an "informal" meeting of the BJP's parliamentary board, it was decided that the bill would be a replica of the ordinance, sources said. "As far as possible", none of the provisions, including those opposed by RSS-aligned constituents like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, would be "diluted", the sources added. "The last thing that the Prime Minister wants is a clone of the UPA law. If that was to be the case, why would the NDA government have laboured over bringing in amendments?" asked a board member. Disquiet is said to be spreading through the ranks of the BJP in the heartland because of the "anti-farmer" and "pro-industry" labels the Opposition has stuck on the ordinance. Provisions in the ordinance that exempt acquisitions for certain industries from prior consent of landowners and a social impact assessment had drawn most of the flak. But a senior minister asked: "Who are these protesters? They belong to NGOs that claim to represent the farmers but not one of their spokespersons has ever farmed or knows the basics of farming. Unfortunately, in the previous UPA regime, a couple of senior ministers got carried away by these very protesters, engaged with them and gave them legitimacy disproportionate to their spheres of influence among farmers. That is why I counselled our government to not reach out to them this time, not even to Anna Hazare." The minister added that if there were "signs of genuine ferment" among the peasants, "we have reasons to worry, put our heads together and think about what next?" "So far, we have not sensed any such thing," he claimed. The government and the BJP leadership are working in concert to counter not only the Opposition but also some Sangh sympathisers. This morning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi briefed the party MPs on the bill. In the evening, the government asked rural development minister Chaudhary Birender Singh to make a presentation. BJP president Amit Shah set up an eight-member panel of MPs to network with farmers and speak to their organisations. The MPs are mainly from Bihar, which will vote later this year, and Uttar Pradesh where the Opposition is addressing the predominantly rural populace. The BJP is building its case on the contention that its bill will ensure four times more compensation than earlier and other long-term benefits when land is acquired for public projects. In the Lok Sabha, the government can push through the bill even if the entire Opposition is united. But it does not have the majority in the Rajya Sabha. Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge warned the government against bulldozing its way instead of adopting a consensual approach. But parliamentary affairs minister Venkaiah Naidu declared: "The minority cannot dictate to the majority. That will be the murder of democracy." |