Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11758, 'title' => 'Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2699861.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11876, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11758, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution &nbsp; The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11758, 'title' => 'Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2699861.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11876, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11758 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution &nbsp; The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the ‘sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal “through an appropriate mechanism.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version — that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members — by one count 18 of the 30 — were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution “on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;” that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11758, 'title' => 'Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2699861.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11876, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11758, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution &nbsp; The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11758, 'title' => 'Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2699861.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11876, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11758 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution &nbsp; The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the ‘sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal “through an appropriate mechanism.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version — that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members — by one count 18 of the 30 — were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution “on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;” that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810c3c9545c3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11758, 'title' => 'Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2699861.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11876, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11758, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution &nbsp; The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11758, 'title' => 'Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2699861.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11876, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11758 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution &nbsp; The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the &lsquo;sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal &ldquo;through an appropriate mechanism.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version &mdash; that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members &mdash; by one count 18 of the 30 &mdash; were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution &ldquo;on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;&rdquo; that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the ‘sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal “through an appropriate mechanism.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version — that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members — by one count 18 of the 30 — were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution “on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;” that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11758, 'title' => 'Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the ‘sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal “through an appropriate mechanism.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version — that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members — by one count 18 of the 30 — were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution “on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;” that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2699861.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11876, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11758, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the ‘sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal “through an appropriate mechanism.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version — that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members — by one count 18 of the 30 — were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution “on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;” that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11758, 'title' => 'Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the ‘sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal “through an appropriate mechanism.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version — that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members — by one count 18 of the 30 — were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution “on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;” that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2699861.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-veering-round-to-including-group-c-employees-in-lokpal-by-smita-gupta-11876', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11876, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11758 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the ‘sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal “through an appropriate mechanism.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version — that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members — by one count 18 of the 30 — were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution “on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;” that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Centre veering round to including Group C employees in Lokpal by Smita Gupta |
Idea to keep promise made in ‘sense of the House' resolution The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, which in recent days indicated that it was not keen on including the lower bureaucracy within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill, as it was billed as an instrument to deal with corruption in high places, is now veering round to the view that the Group C employees could be included in the Bill it is bringing before Parliament, probably on December 19. A day before the Parliamentary Standing Committee attached to the Ministry of Personnel tables its report on the Bill in the House, government sources indicated that the Group C employees were likely to be included in the government's version of the Bill. These sources made two points: one, that only complaints of corruption that attract penal provisions will be entertained, not grievances; and two, that one possible way to deal with the volume would be to let these complaints go first to the Central Vigilance Commission, as it happens now, and then route the really serious ones periodically to the Lokpal for further action. By doing so, the government will keep the promise it made in the ‘sense of the House' resolution that was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on August 27: it has spoken of bringing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal “through an appropriate mechanism.” Thus the government will also take into account the sentiments of the Standing Committee, where all non-Congress parties are rooting for inclusion of the Group C employees; three of the Congress MPs, too, are pressing for it. Sources on the committee said one reason why this is that was because members of Team Anna have been relentlessly lobbying for inclusion of the Group C employees with individual MPs on the panel. However, the government is still not keen on including the Prime Minister, while still holding office; it wants to stick to the provision in the original government version — that the Prime Minister can be subject to investigation, but only after he demits office. Government sources said that given the current climate, it would be impossible for any government to work under such conditions. On the Standing Committee, more than half the members — by one count 18 of the 30 — were either for not including the Prime Minister at all or for including him only after he demits office. The parties keenest to include the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Lokpal Bill are the BJP, the Left and the Biju Janata Dal. Indeed, in the dissent note submitted by the CPI(M)'s A. Sampath, he said the Prime Minister as well as the lower bureaucracy should be brought within the purview of the Bill. He also asked for all MPs to be brought within the ambit, by amending Article 105 of the Constitution “on the lines recommended by the National Commission to review the working of the Constitution;” that the Lokpal should be provided with its own investigation mechanism with exclusive jurisdiction over the Prevention of Corruption Act; that the CBI Director should be selected by the Selection Committee constituted for selecting the chairperson and other members of the Lokpal; and that the Lokpal should be given powers to investigate cases involving business entities. |