Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6855, 'title' => 'Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> <em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /> </em><br /> The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /> <br /> The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /> <br /> While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /> <br /> The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /> <br /> Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /> <br /> The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /> <br /> The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /> <br /> In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/05/stories/2011040563801200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6952, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 6855, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6855, 'title' => 'Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> <em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /> </em><br /> The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /> <br /> The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /> <br /> While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /> <br /> The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /> <br /> Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /> <br /> The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /> <br /> The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /> <br /> In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/05/stories/2011040563801200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6952, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 6855 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption' $metaDesc = ' The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides — private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura — to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the “presumptive loss” to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a “weak and indeterminate manner,” and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. “The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,” the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja “deliberately and dishonestly” did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: “Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.”<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja “deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.”<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. “The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,” the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had “selectively” leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. “Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,” the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. “The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,” the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. “Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.”<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained “undue benefits” while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6855, 'title' => 'Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> <em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /> </em><br /> The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /> <br /> The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /> <br /> While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /> <br /> The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /> <br /> Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /> <br /> The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /> <br /> The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /> <br /> In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/05/stories/2011040563801200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6952, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 6855, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6855, 'title' => 'Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> <em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /> </em><br /> The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /> <br /> The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /> <br /> While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /> <br /> The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /> <br /> Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /> <br /> The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /> <br /> The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /> <br /> In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/05/stories/2011040563801200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6952, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 6855 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption' $metaDesc = ' The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides — private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura — to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the “presumptive loss” to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a “weak and indeterminate manner,” and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. “The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,” the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja “deliberately and dishonestly” did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: “Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.”<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja “deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.”<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. “The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,” the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had “selectively” leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. “Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,” the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. “The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,” the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. “Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.”<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained “undue benefits” while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f0b8e4d5c2d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6855, 'title' => 'Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> <em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /> </em><br /> The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /> <br /> The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /> <br /> While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /> <br /> The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /> <br /> Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /> <br /> The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /> <br /> The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /> <br /> In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/05/stories/2011040563801200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6952, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 6855, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6855, 'title' => 'Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> <em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /> </em><br /> The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /> <br /> The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /> <br /> While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /> <br /> The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /> <br /> Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /> <br /> The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /> <br /> The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /> <br /> In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/05/stories/2011040563801200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6952, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 6855 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption' $metaDesc = ' The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides &mdash; private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura &mdash; to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the &ldquo;presumptive loss&rdquo; to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a &ldquo;weak and indeterminate manner,&rdquo; and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,&rdquo; the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja &ldquo;deliberately and dishonestly&rdquo; did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: &ldquo;Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.&rdquo;<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja &ldquo;deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.&rdquo;<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. &ldquo;The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,&rdquo; the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had &ldquo;selectively&rdquo; leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. &ldquo;Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,&rdquo; the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. &ldquo;The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,&rdquo; the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. &ldquo;Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.&rdquo;<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained &ldquo;undue benefits&rdquo; while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides — private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura — to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the “presumptive loss” to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a “weak and indeterminate manner,” and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. “The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,” the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja “deliberately and dishonestly” did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: “Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.”<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja “deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.”<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. “The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,” the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had “selectively” leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. “Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,” the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. “The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,” the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. “Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.”<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained “undue benefits” while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6855, 'title' => 'Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> <em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /> </em><br /> The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /> <br /> The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides — private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura — to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /> <br /> While the CAG said the “presumptive loss” to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /> <br /> The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a “weak and indeterminate manner,” and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. “The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,” the CAG said in its audit report.<br /> <br /> Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja “deliberately and dishonestly” did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: “Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.”<br /> <br /> The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja “deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.”<br /> <br /> Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. “The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,” the CAG observed.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had “selectively” leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. “Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,” the CBI has said.<br /> <br /> The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. “The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,” the CAG said.<br /> <br /> The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. “Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.”<br /> <br /> Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained “undue benefits” while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /> <br /> In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/05/stories/2011040563801200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6952, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 6855, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides — private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura — to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the “presumptive loss” to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a “weak and indeterminate manner,” and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. “The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,” the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja “deliberately and dishonestly” did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: “Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.”<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja “deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.”<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. “The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,” the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had “selectively” leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. “Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,” the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. “The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,” the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. “Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.”<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained “undue benefits” while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6855, 'title' => 'Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> <em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /> </em><br /> The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /> <br /> The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides — private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura — to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /> <br /> While the CAG said the “presumptive loss” to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /> <br /> The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a “weak and indeterminate manner,” and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. “The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,” the CAG said in its audit report.<br /> <br /> Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja “deliberately and dishonestly” did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: “Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.”<br /> <br /> The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja “deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.”<br /> <br /> Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. “The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,” the CAG observed.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had “selectively” leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. “Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,” the CBI has said.<br /> <br /> The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. “The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,” the CAG said.<br /> <br /> The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. “Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.”<br /> <br /> Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained “undue benefits” while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /> <br /> In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 5 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/05/stories/2011040563801200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'charge-sheet-identical-to-cag-findings-by-sandeep-joshi-6952', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6952, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 6855 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption' $metaDesc = ' The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify"><em>The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore<br /></em><br />The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore.<br /><br />The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides — private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura — to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications.<br /><br />While the CAG said the “presumptive loss” to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore.<br /><br />The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a “weak and indeterminate manner,” and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. “The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,” the CAG said in its audit report.<br /><br />Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja “deliberately and dishonestly” did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: “Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.”<br /><br />The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja “deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.”<br /><br />Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. “The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,” the CAG observed.<br /><br />On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had “selectively” leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. “Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,” the CBI has said.<br /><br />The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. “The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,” the CAG said.<br /><br />The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. “Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.”<br /><br />Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained “undue benefits” while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL).<br /><br />In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Charge sheet identical to CAG findings by Sandeep Joshi |
The only difference is in revenue loss, which the investigating agency CBI put at Rs.30,984 crore
The Central Bureau of Investigation's first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam is almost identical to what the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) said, except for the figure of revenue loss, which the CBI has put at Rs.30,984 crore. The CBI agrees with the CAG audit findings that the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, not only misled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but also overruled the objections of such important Ministries as Finance, and Law and Justice while deciding on issues related to the pricing and allocation of licences. Mr. Raja flouted all rules and regulations in connivance with his aides — private secretary R.K. Chandolia and Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura — to favour Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Communications. While the CAG said the “presumptive loss” to the exchequer in the allocation of 122 new licences, 35 dual technology licences and extra spectrum was between Rs.1.76 lakh crore and Rs.57,666 crore (based on four assumptions), the CBI has put the figure at Rs.30,984 crore. However, at the time of the filing of the FIR in 2009, the CBI had put the loss at Rs.22,000 crore. The CAG report pointed out that the telecom policy was implemented in a “weak and indeterminate manner,” and also to the Department of Telecom's reluctance in addressing the issue of 2G spectrum pricing despite reminders from the TRAI, the Finance Ministry, and even the Prime Minister. “The entire process of allocation of UAS licences lacked transparency and was undertaken in an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner,” the CAG said in its audit report. Now the CBI has also said Mr. Raja “deliberately and dishonestly” did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee. Going a step forward, the charge sheet has said: “Investigation has disclosed that accused [Mr.] Raja, despite the repeated suggestions from various corners of the government for the revision of the entry fee to be charged from the new UAS licensees and dual technology applicants, deliberately and dishonestly did not consider auction or revision of the entry fee, and gave away licences at the same fee which was discovered in 2001.” The CBI has said Mr. Raja hatched a criminal conspiracy with the managing director of Unitech Ltd., Sanjay Chandra, Swan Telecom Promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, and Vinod Goenka, Director of the Mumbai-based DB Realty, and adopted the 2001 price, ignoring the concerns of various sections of the government. Mr. Raja “deprived the government exchequer of possible revenues which could have accrued, even [after] retaining the level playing field for the new operators.” Like the CAG, the CBI has pointed out how the first come, first served policy was blatantly flouted. “The last nail in the coffin of transparency and objectivity of the policy was death by selective leaking of the date of issue of LoIs [Letters of Intent] to a few applicants, as a result of which they were ready with pre-dated demand drafts for thousands of crores of rupees prior to the date of the issue of the press release calling for applicants to collect the LoIs from the DoT,” the CAG observed. On the other hand, the charge sheet has said DoT officials had “selectively” leaked the information on the issuance of the LoIs to these two companies, which were ready with the amount and were able to deposit the fee earlier than others. “Investigation has revealed that the accused persons connected with Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. had prior knowledge of an ill-conceived design of the first come, first served process and had been keeping the demand drafts ready since early October-November 2007 itself. Even the policy was implemented by the DoT in a manner that resulted in a wrongful gain to certain companies,” the CBI has said. The CAG report stated Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB Telecom) and Unitech (brand name Uninor) made crores of rupees by just offloading stakes in their companies to foreign partners without having any network or infrastructure. “The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was nothing but the true value of the spectrum, which should have normally accrued to the public exchequer had the transparent and fair market mechanism been followed for the allocation of UAS licences,” the CAG said. The charge sheet has also said some new entrants made crores by selling their stakes, and the biggest beneficiaries were the promoters of Unitech Wireless, who made Rs.2,342 crore. “Actual investment of promoters in equity was Rs.138 crore, which was valued at Rs.2,480 crore, indicating a gain of Rs.2,342 crore to the promoters of M/s Unitech Wireless.” Likewise, the CAG pointed out that Reliance Communications not only made Swan act as its front company, thus getting benefits in the grant of spectrum, but also gained “undue benefits” while applying for access to dual technology (GSM and CDMA) and was favoured over companies like Tata Teleservices (TTSL). In its charge sheet, the CBI has said Mr. Raja, along with Shahid Usman Balwa, Vivek Goenka of Swan Telecom and Sanjay Chandra, conspired to deprive TTSL and Spice Communication of 2G spectrum, though they had priority over Swan Telecom. It has said Mr. Chandolia threatened senior DoT officials to ensure grant of spectrum to Swan Telecom, which was ineligible for the licence. |