Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Economic Times 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis/articleshow/9009439.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8667,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Economic Times 


&amp;nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Economic Times &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Economic Times 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis/articleshow/9009439.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8667,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8566
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Economic Times 


&amp;nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Economic Times &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Economic Times 


&nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Economic Times </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.<br /><br />The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries' executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.<br /><br />Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission's order and providing information on the issue.<br /><br />Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers' names were excluded.<br /><br />Giving the order, Gandhi said, &quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission's order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&quot;<br /><br />CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&quot;<br /><br />While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&quot;<br /><br />The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Economic Times 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis/articleshow/9009439.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8667,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Economic Times 


&amp;nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Economic Times &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Economic Times 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis/articleshow/9009439.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8667,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8566
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Economic Times 


&amp;nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Economic Times &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Economic Times 


&nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Economic Times </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.<br /><br />The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries' executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.<br /><br />Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission's order and providing information on the issue.<br /><br />Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers' names were excluded.<br /><br />Giving the order, Gandhi said, &quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission's order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&quot;<br /><br />CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&quot;<br /><br />While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&quot;<br /><br />The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de89f08fcc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Economic Times 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis/articleshow/9009439.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8667,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Economic Times 


&amp;nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Economic Times &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8566,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Economic Times 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis/articleshow/9009439.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8667,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8566
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Economic Times 


&amp;nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Economic Times &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries&#039; executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission&#039;s order and providing information on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers&#039; names were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Giving the order, Gandhi said, &amp;quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission&#039;s order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &amp;quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &amp;quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Economic Times 


&nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Economic Times </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.<br /><br />The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries' executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.<br /><br />Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission's order and providing information on the issue.<br /><br />Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers' names were excluded.<br /><br />Giving the order, Gandhi said, &quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission's order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&quot;<br /><br />CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&quot;<br /><br />While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&quot;<br /><br />The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 8566,
		'title' => 'CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p>
-The Economic Times 
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.<br />
<br />
The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries' executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.<br />
<br />
Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission's order and providing information on the issue.<br />
<br />
Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers' names were excluded.<br />
<br />
Giving the order, Gandhi said, &quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission's order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&quot;<br />
<br />
CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&quot;<br />
<br />
While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&quot;<br />
<br />
The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 27 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis/articleshow/9009439.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 8667,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 8566,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Economic Times 


&nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance...',
	'disp' => '<p>-The Economic Times </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.<br /><br />The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries' executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.<br /><br />Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission's order and providing information on the issue.<br /><br />Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers' names were excluded.<br /><br />Giving the order, Gandhi said, &quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission's order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&quot;<br /><br />CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&quot;<br /><br />While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&quot;<br /><br />The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 8566,
	'title' => 'CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p>
-The Economic Times 
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.<br />
<br />
The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries' executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.<br />
<br />
Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission's order and providing information on the issue.<br />
<br />
Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers' names were excluded.<br />
<br />
Giving the order, Gandhi said, &quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission's order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&quot;<br />
<br />
CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&quot;<br />
<br />
While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&quot;<br />
<br />
The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 27 June, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis/articleshow/9009439.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'cic-raps-cbi-for-not-giving-info-on-ambanis-8667',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 8667,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 8566
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information'
$metaDesc = '
-The Economic Times 


&nbsp;


The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.

The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance...'
$disp = '<p>-The Economic Times </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case.<br /><br />The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries' executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government.<br /><br />Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission's order and providing information on the issue.<br /><br />Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers' names were excluded.<br /><br />Giving the order, Gandhi said, &quot;From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission's order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide.&quot;<br /><br />CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, &quot;CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged.&quot;<br /><br />While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, &quot;Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders.&quot;<br /><br />The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

CIC raps CBI for not giving info on Ambanis

-The Economic Times   The Central Information Commission (CIC) has summoned CBI officials for failure to give reasons on why the Ambani brothers were not chargesheeted in the call re-routing case. The CBI had last year filed a chargesheet against five Reliance Industries' executives in a case related to passing off of international calls as local calls and causing revenue loss to the government. Information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has asked the CBI public information officer to explain why penalty should not be imposed for failing to comply with the commission's order and providing information on the issue. Delhi resident P C Srivastava had asked CBI for details related to the call re-routing case including the timeline of the investigation, why the names of Mukesh and Anil Ambani were not included in the chargesheet and legal opinion on the basis of which the brothers' names were excluded. Giving the order, Gandhi said, "From the facts before the commission, it appears that you have failed to comply with the order of the commission and not provided the requisite information within the time limit specified. The denial on your part in providing information amounts to willful disobedience of the commission's order and also raises a reasonable doubt that the denial may be mala fide." CBI had earlier rejected the RTI application saying the information sought was confidential and disclosure would impede investigation. CBI public information officer argued before the commission, "CBI had decided to prosecute certain directors and the reasons for not prosecuting Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani were on record. However, disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the case by which they would be able to argue why they should not be charged." While ordering for disclosure, Gandhi said the PIO had failed to produce any cogent evidence before the commission on the basis of which the PIO had established that disclosure of information will impede the prosecution of offenders. He added, "Moreover, this commission is unable to understand how lack of evidence against a person can be used by another person against whom evidence has in fact been found leading to filing of chargesheet against the latter. On this basis, the commission rejects the contention of the PIO that the information sought was exempted under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The PIO has not been able to justify how disclosing the information would impede the process of prosecution of offenders." The agency had chargesheeted Manoj Modi, Akhil Gupta, Shankar Adawal, Pankaj Panwar, K R Raju and Bhagwan Das Khurana of Reliance Infocomm Ltd in the case. Reliance Infocomm also paid Rs 150 crore towards penalty imposed by telecom tribunal TDSAT.