Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]latest-news-updates/cic-returns-12-of-pleas-rukmini-s-4677744.html"/> LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC returns 12% of pleas -Rukmini S | Im4change.org
Resource centre on India's rural distress
 
 

CIC returns 12% of pleas -Rukmini S

-The Hindu

An analysis by Right to Information activists confirms that the Central Information Commission is returning requests for information at a high rate to the applicants.

Twelve per cent of all second appeals and complaints received by the CIC this year were returned to the senders, with reasons for the return being made available in only a fraction of cases.

As reported earlier by The Hindu, the number of cases the CIC admits has crashed precipitously. Activists say it is likely that a larger number of applicants are having their requests turned down. It is difficult to track requests which have been turned down by the CIC in the absence of clear information about them, say the activists.

An analysis by Manisha Chachra, Venkatesh Nayak and Lakshya Thukral of the Access to Information Programme of CHRI has shown that the CIC received 71,166 second appeals and complaints between January and October, 2015, and returned 8,534 or almost 12 per cent to the sender. The rate of return spiked in August , when one out of every five requests was returned.

Simultaneously, Anjali Bhardwaj and Amrita Johri of the National Campaign for the People’s Right to Information analysed the “deficiency memos” that the CIC must create for every appeal or complaint returned to the sender.

In August 2015 alone, they found that the CIC received 6,389 pieces of mail. Of these, the status for 1,048 showed they were ‘returned to sender’; 183 were marked ‘registered,’ and the remaining 5,158 as ‘fresh dak,’ meaning that they were yet unopened.

A random sample of 5 per cent of those returned to the sender showed that the deficiency memos could only be located for 11 of the 54 cases which were returned.