Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28956, 'title' => 'Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /> <br /> There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /> <br /> Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /> <br /> &quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /> <br /> Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /> <br /> &quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /> <br /> Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /> <br /> DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /> <br /> Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /> <br /> The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 August, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in/articleshow/48549608.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4677010, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28956, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'metaKeywords' => 'Digital Divide,Digital Freedom,Digital Media,Access to ICTs,Access to Internet,Net Neutrality,Internet Freedom', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />&quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />&quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28956, 'title' => 'Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /> <br /> There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /> <br /> Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /> <br /> &quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /> <br /> Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /> <br /> &quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /> <br /> Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /> <br /> DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /> <br /> Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /> <br /> The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 August, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in/articleshow/48549608.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4677010, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28956 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in' $metaKeywords = 'Digital Divide,Digital Freedom,Digital Media,Access to ICTs,Access to Internet,Net Neutrality,Internet Freedom' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />&quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />&quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. "Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video," says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />"Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype."<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />"Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India," says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, "It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right." <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. "Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users."<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28956, 'title' => 'Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /> <br /> There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /> <br /> Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /> <br /> &quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /> <br /> Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /> <br /> &quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /> <br /> Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /> <br /> DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /> <br /> Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /> <br /> The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 August, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in/articleshow/48549608.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4677010, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28956, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'metaKeywords' => 'Digital Divide,Digital Freedom,Digital Media,Access to ICTs,Access to Internet,Net Neutrality,Internet Freedom', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />&quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />&quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28956, 'title' => 'Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /> <br /> There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /> <br /> Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /> <br /> &quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /> <br /> Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /> <br /> &quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /> <br /> Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /> <br /> DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /> <br /> Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /> <br /> The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 August, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in/articleshow/48549608.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4677010, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28956 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in' $metaKeywords = 'Digital Divide,Digital Freedom,Digital Media,Access to ICTs,Access to Internet,Net Neutrality,Internet Freedom' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />&quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />&quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. "Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video," says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />"Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype."<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />"Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India," says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, "It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right." <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. "Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users."<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f100cccd310-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f100cccd310-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28956, 'title' => 'Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /> <br /> There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /> <br /> Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /> <br /> &quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /> <br /> Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /> <br /> &quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /> <br /> Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /> <br /> DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /> <br /> Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /> <br /> The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 August, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in/articleshow/48549608.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4677010, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28956, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'metaKeywords' => 'Digital Divide,Digital Freedom,Digital Media,Access to ICTs,Access to Internet,Net Neutrality,Internet Freedom', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />&quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />&quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28956, 'title' => 'Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /> <br /> There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /> <br /> Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /> <br /> &quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /> <br /> Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /> <br /> &quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /> <br /> Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /> <br /> DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /> <br /> Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /> <br /> The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 August, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in/articleshow/48549608.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4677010, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28956 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in' $metaKeywords = 'Digital Divide,Digital Freedom,Digital Media,Access to ICTs,Access to Internet,Net Neutrality,Internet Freedom' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. &quot;Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video,&quot; says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />&quot;Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype.&quot;<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />&quot;Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India,&quot; says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, &quot;It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right.&quot; <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. &quot;Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users.&quot;<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. "Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video," says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />"Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype."<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />"Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India," says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, "It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right." <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. "Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users."<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28956, 'title' => 'Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /> <br /> There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. "Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video," says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /> <br /> Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /> <br /> "Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype."<br /> <br /> Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /> <br /> "Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India," says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /> <br /> Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, "It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right." <br /> <br /> DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /> <br /> Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. "Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users."<br /> <br /> The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 August, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in/articleshow/48549608.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4677010, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28956, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'metaKeywords' => 'Digital Divide,Digital Freedom,Digital Media,Access to ICTs,Access to Internet,Net Neutrality,Internet Freedom', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. "Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video," says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />"Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype."<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />"Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India," says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, "It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right." <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. "Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users."<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28956, 'title' => 'Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /> <br /> There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. "Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video," says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /> <br /> Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /> <br /> "Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype."<br /> <br /> Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /> <br /> "Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India," says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /> <br /> Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, "It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right." <br /> <br /> DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /> <br /> Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. "Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users."<br /> <br /> The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 August, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in/articleshow/48549608.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'citizens-fight-for-net-neutrality-on-mygov-in-4677010', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4677010, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28956 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in' $metaKeywords = 'Digital Divide,Digital Freedom,Digital Media,Access to ICTs,Access to Internet,Net Neutrality,Internet Freedom' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans.<br /><br />There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. "Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video," says Abhishek Ahuja.<br /><br />Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar.<br /><br />"Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype."<br /><br />Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT).<br /><br />"Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India," says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari.<br /><br />Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, "It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right." <br /><br />DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it.<br /><br />Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. "Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users."<br /><br />The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Citizens fight for net neutrality on mygov.in |
-The Times of India
NEW DELHI: There is widespread support for net neutrality on the government's citizen engagement platform mygov.in where a majority of people have voiced their concerns against zero-rated plans. There are nearly 70,000 comments on the website with just a day to go before the end of the participative process and most of these seek unfettered and non-discriminatory access to the internet. "Telecom should not define policy. Net neutrality is me being able to access anything on the internet without paying more or less for it. A byte of data should have the same price, regardless of whether it is a VoIP call, or a Youtube video," says Abhishek Ahuja. Similar sentiments were echoed by Gaurav Nagar. "Our government must implement TRUE net neutrality, not a PESUDO net neutrality as defined by telecom companies. All apps/websites should be treated equally and no preference should be given to any app/website. No privilege should be given to a website/app that pays Trai to have users browse its content for free. Citizens of India have already struggled a lot in the earlier Licence Raj. The government should not go back to the Licence Raj, by avoiding licensing for services like Whatsapp, Skype." Since the time the government has invited comments on the subject, there are demands at various forums to maintain equality and non-discrimination over the internet, so that the spirit of entrepreneurship and start-ups is maintained and citizens continue to get unhindered access without any prioritization accorded to any website. Many of the comments are against moves by telecom operators to introduce zero-rated platforms, while also speaking against zero-rated offerings such as internet.org that was offered by social media giant Facebook, which had faced flak from a committee of the department of telecom (DoT). "Net neutrality would be a true mirror of democracy. Let's not be forced by consumerism of corporate giants. It is our right as citizen of India," says Prashant Sunil Chaudhari. Another citizen, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, said, "It is right of citizens to access content provided on internet, without any restriction by telecom operators. It is citizens who have authority to choose which content they want to access. Net neutrality is must for bringing equality on digital platforms. I support net neutrality and it's our right." DoT has already submitted a report on the subject where it has come out against any kind of paid prioritisation in traffic management by the telcos. Regulator Trai is also preparing a report on the subject, while a Parliamentary Standing Committee is also looking into it. Amit Sharma, another user of mygov.in, made a case against zero-rated plans. "Zero rating allows large companies to act as gatekeepers of the internet and control which services Indians can access, (and so) must be prohibited. The DoT draft recommendations are too weak on this, and the government must take a strong stand to protect users." The government has said that it will take a final view after taking into consideration the findings of the various committees as well as going through the opinions voiced by citizens. |