Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6824543402883-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6824543402883-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6824543402883-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 9 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/City-s-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts/814932/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8895,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 9 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/City-s-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts/814932/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8895,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8793
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.<br /><br />The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.<br /><br />But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.<br /><br />The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.<br /><br />Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&rdquo; the survey noted.<br /><br />Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.<br /><br />While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6824543402883-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6824543402883-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6824543402883-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 9 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/City-s-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts/814932/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8895,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 9 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/City-s-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts/814932/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8895,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8793
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.<br /><br />The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.<br /><br />But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.<br /><br />The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.<br /><br />Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&rdquo; the survey noted.<br /><br />Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.<br /><br />While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6824543402883-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6824543402883-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6824543402883-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6824543402883-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 9 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/City-s-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts/814932/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8895,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8793,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 9 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/City-s-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts/814932/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8895,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8793
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&amp;rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&amp;rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &amp;ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&amp;rdquo; the survey noted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.<br /><br />The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.<br /><br />But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.<br /><br />The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.<br /><br />Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&rdquo; the survey noted.<br /><br />Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.<br /><br />While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 8793,
		'title' => 'City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.<br />
<br />
The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.<br />
<br />
But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.<br />
<br />
The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.<br />
<br />
Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&rdquo; the survey noted.<br />
<br />
Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.<br />
<br />
While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/City-s-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts/814932/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 8895,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 8793,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty',
	'metaDesc' => '

There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.<br /><br />The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.<br /><br />But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.<br /><br />The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.<br /><br />Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&rdquo; the survey noted.<br /><br />Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.<br /><br />While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 8793,
	'title' => 'City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.<br />
<br />
The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.<br />
<br />
But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.<br />
<br />
The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.<br />
<br />
Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&rdquo; the survey noted.<br />
<br />
Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.<br />
<br />
While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 9 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/City-s-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts/814932/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'citys-poor-dwellers-are-no-richer-than-village-counterparts-ens-economic-bureau-8895',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 8895,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 8793
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau'
$metaKeywords = 'Poverty'
$metaDesc = '

There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">There&rsquo;s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation&rsquo;s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure.<br /><br />The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India&rsquo;s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average.<br /><br />But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month.<br /><br />The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India.<br /><br />Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. &ldquo;The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,&rdquo; the survey noted.<br /><br />Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians.<br /><br />While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

City’s poor dwellers are no richer than village counterparts -ENS Economic Bureau

There’s not much difference between the spending patterns of the urban and rural poor but the city-village divide becomes much wider amongst the rich in each class. These are some of the key findings of the National Sample Survey Organisation’s (NSSO) 66th round of survey on household consumption expenditure. The survey, which was carried out between July, 2009 and June, 2010 has revealed that the poorest 10 per cent of India’s rural population had an average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) of Rs 453. The poorest 10 per cent of the urban population spent an almost similar Rs 599 per month on an average. But the top 10 per cent of the urban population spent on an average 2.5 time more than their rural counterparts at Rs 5,863 per month against Rs 2,517 per month. The expenditure pattern becomes even starker between the rich and poor. In rural areas, the top 10 per cent of the population spent 5.6 times more than the poorest 10 per cent, while in urban areas, the divide was even wider. The top 10 per cent spent on an average 9.8 times more than the poorest 10 per cent every month. The MPCE in 2009-10 was estimated at Rs 1,053.64 in rural India and Rs 1,984.46 in urban India. Food continued to be the major item of expenditure in rural areas for both the rich and poor, but in urban areas, the rich spend just a third of their total monthly expenditure on food. “The share of food in total household expenditure was 57 per cent and 44 per cent in rural and urban India respectively,” the survey noted. Significantly, the expenditure on food declined in both rural and urban households in 2009-10, as compared to 2004-05. However, spending on non food articles such as durable goods, services, clothing and footwear marked a rise, indicating better living standards amongst rural and urban Indians. While in rural India, this share in respect of bottom 10 per cent population was 65 per cent, it was 46 per cent for the top 10 per cent population. Meanwhile, in urban India, the share of food was 62 per cent for its bottom 10 per cent of population and 31 per cent for top 10 per cent population.