Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Business Standard
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 5 February, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-114020401166_1.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24148,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer,cash transfers&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Business Standard&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Business Standard
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 5 February, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-114020401166_1.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24148,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 23976
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer,cash transfers&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Business Standard&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem</em></p><p align="justify"><em> </em>The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.</p><p align="justify">About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &quot;demographic&quot; data being collected by &quot;private&quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.</p><p align="justify">The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.</p><p align="justify">Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn't be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &quot;body corporate&quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?</p><p align="justify">Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.</p><p align="justify">The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry's National Population Register project, said if &quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.</p><p align="justify">During Tuesday's proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar's use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.</p><p align="justify">The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Business Standard
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 5 February, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-114020401166_1.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24148,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer,cash transfers&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Business Standard&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Business Standard
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 5 February, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-114020401166_1.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24148,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 23976
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer,cash transfers&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Business Standard&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem</em></p><p align="justify"><em> </em>The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.</p><p align="justify">About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &quot;demographic&quot; data being collected by &quot;private&quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.</p><p align="justify">The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.</p><p align="justify">Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn't be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &quot;body corporate&quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?</p><p align="justify">Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.</p><p align="justify">The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry's National Population Register project, said if &quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.</p><p align="justify">During Tuesday's proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar's use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.</p><p align="justify">The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f24f8ebbfae-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Business Standard
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 5 February, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-114020401166_1.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24148,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer,cash transfers&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Business Standard&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 23976,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Business Standard
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 5 February, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-114020401166_1.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 24148,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 23976
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer,cash transfers&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Business Standard&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn&#039;t be a problem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &amp;quot;demographic&amp;quot; data being collected by &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn&#039;t be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &amp;quot;body corporate&amp;quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry&#039;s National Population Register project, said if &amp;quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&amp;quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;During Tuesday&#039;s proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar&#039;s use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &amp;quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&amp;quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem</em></p><p align="justify"><em> </em>The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.</p><p align="justify">About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &quot;demographic&quot; data being collected by &quot;private&quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.</p><p align="justify">The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.</p><p align="justify">Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn't be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &quot;body corporate&quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?</p><p align="justify">Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.</p><p align="justify">The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry's National Population Register project, said if &quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.</p><p align="justify">During Tuesday's proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar's use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.</p><p align="justify">The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 23976,
		'title' => 'Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Business Standard
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em> </em>The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.
</p>
<p align="justify">
About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &quot;demographic&quot; data being collected by &quot;private&quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn't be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &quot;body corporate&quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?
</p>
<p align="justify">
Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry's National Population Register project, said if &quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During Tuesday's proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar's use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 February, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-114020401166_1.html',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 24148,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 23976,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC',
	'metaKeywords' => 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer,cash transfers',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem</em></p><p align="justify"><em> </em>The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.</p><p align="justify">About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &quot;demographic&quot; data being collected by &quot;private&quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.</p><p align="justify">The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.</p><p align="justify">Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn't be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &quot;body corporate&quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?</p><p align="justify">Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.</p><p align="justify">The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry's National Population Register project, said if &quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.</p><p align="justify">During Tuesday's proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar's use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.</p><p align="justify">The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 23976,
	'title' => 'Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Business Standard
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em> </em>The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.
</p>
<p align="justify">
About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &quot;demographic&quot; data being collected by &quot;private&quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn't be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &quot;body corporate&quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?
</p>
<p align="justify">
Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry's National Population Register project, said if &quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During Tuesday's proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar's use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 February, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-114020401166_1.html',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'clarify-stand-on-uidai-structure-sc-24148',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 24148,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 23976
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC'
$metaKeywords = 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer,cash transfers'
$metaDesc = '
-The Business Standard



Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem


 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem</em></p><p align="justify"><em> </em>The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them.</p><p align="justify">About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the &quot;demographic&quot; data being collected by &quot;private&quot; operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains.</p><p align="justify">The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar.</p><p align="justify">Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn't be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a &quot;body corporate&quot;. When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president?</p><p align="justify">Parasaran sought time to respond to the question.</p><p align="justify">The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry's National Population Register project, said if &quot;Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens&quot;, as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well.</p><p align="justify">The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond.</p><p align="justify">During Tuesday's proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar's use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that &quot;central government has a method of tagging an individual,&quot; through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project.</p><p align="justify">The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Clarify stand on UIDAI structure: SC

-The Business Standard Observes that giving Aadhaar to non-citizens shouldn't be a problem The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the government to clarify the structure of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to ascertain the legal validity of the agreements UIDAI had entered into with states. The court, while hearing a joint review petition by government agencies on its order on linking UID, or Aadhaar, numbers with government services, also said there was nothing wrong with giving legal migrants UID numbers, as this might help keep a check on them. About 10 state governments, the petroleum ministry, oil marketing companies and UIDAI are a party to the petition. Advocate Shyam Divan, who represented one of the petitioners, told a three-judge Bench UIDAI was collecting biometric and demographic data without any statutory backing. He argued while the biometrics of individuals were being encrypted by the authority, there was no protection of the "demographic" data being collected by "private" operators, adding these could be misused for commercial gains. The Bench is headed by B S Chauhan and comprises judges M Y Eqbal and J Chelameswar. Divan reiterated UIDAI had no statutory backing, adding the entity had entered into memoranda of understanding with state governments. He added as these had no legal basis, in case of any misuse or foul play, the enrolling agencies couldn't be legally held liable. To this, judge J Chelameswar asked Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran whether UIDAI was a government agency or a "body corporate". When Parasaran replied UIDAI was an attached office of the Planning Commission, Chelameswar asked if that was the case, why were the contracts not in the name of the president? Parasaran sought time to respond to the question. The court, which also sought the distinction between UIDAI and the home ministry's National Population Register project, said if "Aadhaar is permissible for citizens, it should also be for non-citizens", as this might help keep a check on them. This was in response to Divan pointing out UID numbers could be given to non-citizens as well. The next hearing is slated for February 11 and the matter is expected to continue for sometime as five more petitioners have to present their case, before the government lawyers can respond. During Tuesday's proceedings, Divan also elaborated on how Aadhaar's use for authenticating an individual at various points - such as ATMs, toll plaza, offices means that "central government has a method of tagging an individual," through the electronic trail possible through the linkage. He called the authority unconstitutional and evoked the privacy concerns involved with the project. The SC had passed an interim order on September 23 on the petition filed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court K S Puttaswamy stating that no one should suffer due to unavailability of Aadhaar. Later, some central ministries, three public sector undertakings requested a modification of the order, along with UID Authority of India (UIDAI). Several activists like Aruna Roy joined the petition against the Aadhaar over issues such as privacy.