Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6805075e93935-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6805075e93935-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6805075e93935-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12784, 'title' => 'Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/frontpage/story_15077647.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12784, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12784, 'title' => 'Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/frontpage/story_15077647.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12784 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens’ right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline — a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted — already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court’s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare — ‘uneasy lies the head that wears a crown’,” Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. “In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court…”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that “by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision….”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. “We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: “The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6805075e93935-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6805075e93935-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6805075e93935-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12784, 'title' => 'Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/frontpage/story_15077647.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12784, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12784, 'title' => 'Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/frontpage/story_15077647.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12784 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens’ right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline — a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted — already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court’s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare — ‘uneasy lies the head that wears a crown’,” Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. “In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court…”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that “by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision….”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. “We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: “The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6805075e93935-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805075e93935-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6805075e93935-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6805075e93935-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12784, 'title' => 'Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/frontpage/story_15077647.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12784, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12784, 'title' => 'Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/frontpage/story_15077647.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12784 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister&rsquo;s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into &ldquo;minute details&rdquo; of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens&rsquo; right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline &mdash; a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted &mdash; already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court&rsquo;s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare &mdash; &lsquo;uneasy lies the head that wears a crown&rsquo;,&rdquo; Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. &ldquo;In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court&hellip;&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that &ldquo;by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision&hellip;.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. &ldquo;We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,&rdquo; the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: &ldquo;The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens’ right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline — a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted — already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court’s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare — ‘uneasy lies the head that wears a crown’,” Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. “In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court…”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that “by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision….”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. “We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: “The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12784, 'title' => 'Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court upheld citizens’ right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Such a guideline — a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted — already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court’s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare — ‘uneasy lies the head that wears a crown’,” Justice Ganguly said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges focused on the officials. “In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court…” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges said that “by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision….” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. “We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” the PMO said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: “The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/frontpage/story_15077647.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12784, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens’ right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline — a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted — already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court’s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare — ‘uneasy lies the head that wears a crown’,” Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. “In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court…”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that “by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision….”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. “We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: “The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12784, 'title' => 'Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court upheld citizens’ right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Such a guideline — a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted — already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court’s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare — ‘uneasy lies the head that wears a crown’,” Justice Ganguly said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges focused on the officials. “In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court…” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judges said that “by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision….” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. “We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” the PMO said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: “The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/frontpage/story_15077647.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'clean-chit-to-pm-not-pmo-by-samanwaya-rautray-12904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12784 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court upheld citizens’ right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Such a guideline — a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted — already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court’s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare — ‘uneasy lies the head that wears a crown’,” Justice Ganguly said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges focused on the officials. “In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court…”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judges said that “by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision….”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. “We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” the PMO said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: “The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Clean chit to PM, not PMO by Samanwaya Rautray |
The uneasy head that wears the Prime Minister’s crown has been given a clean chit but not the bureaucrats. The Supreme Court today acknowledged that a Prime Minister could not be expected to look into “minute details” of every case placed before him but launched a blistering attack on officials of the PMO and the law ministry for failing to apprise Manmohan Singh of the gravity of the charges against A. Raja when he was telecom minister. The court upheld citizens’ right to seek the prosecution of public servants and suggested Parliament enact a law that requires a decision within four months. If no decision is conveyed within the stipulated time, sanction should be deemed as granted. Such a guideline — a decision within three months and an extra month if the attorney-general needs to be consulted — already exists in the shape of a Supreme Court judgment but it is rarely adhered to when citizens seek permission to prosecute public servants such as ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. The court’s observations came on a petition by Subramanian Swamy who alleged the government sat on his plea to prosecute Raja when he was telecom minister for allotting 2G spectrum. The bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly did not make any adverse comment on the Prime Minister, restricting itself to saying that had he been properly advised, he may not have allowed the matter to linger for over a year. “The position of the Prime Minister in our democratic polity seems to have been summed up in the words of Shakespeare — ‘uneasy lies the head that wears a crown’,” Justice Ganguly said. The judges focused on the officials. “In our view, officers in the PMO and the ministry of law and justice were duty-bound to apprise (the Prime Minister) about the seriousness of allegations made by (Swamy) and judgments of this court…” The judges said that “by the very nature of the office held by him, (the Prime Minister) is not expected to personally look into minute details of each and every case placed before him and has to depend on his advisers and other officers. Unfortunately, those expected to give him proper advice and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so. “We have no doubt that if (the Prime Minister) had been apprised of the true factual and legal position regarding the representation made by Dr Swamy, he would have surely taken an appropriate decision….” The PMO seized upon the positive aspect of the observations. “We welcome the fact that both the learned judges have completely vindicated the Prime Minister whilst appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” the PMO said. On the less flattering remarks on officials, the PMO statement deadpanned: “The government is examining their directions regarding the manner in which applications are to be dealt with.” |