Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 7828,
'title' => 'Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br />
<br />
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br />
<br />
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br />
<br />
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br />
<br />
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br />
<br />
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br />
<br />
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br />
<br />
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br />
<br />
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 24 May, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/24190339/Come-out-with-suitable-compens.html',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 7927,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 7828,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice',
'metaDesc' => '
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K....',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 7828,
'title' => 'Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br />
<br />
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br />
<br />
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br />
<br />
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br />
<br />
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br />
<br />
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br />
<br />
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br />
<br />
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br />
<br />
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 24 May, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/24190339/Come-out-with-suitable-compens.html',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 7927,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 7828
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K....'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K...."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />“We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don’t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners”? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />“What was the urgency involved?” the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 7828,
'title' => 'Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br />
<br />
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br />
<br />
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br />
<br />
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br />
<br />
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br />
<br />
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br />
<br />
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br />
<br />
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br />
<br />
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 24 May, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/24190339/Come-out-with-suitable-compens.html',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 7927,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 7828,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice',
'metaDesc' => '
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K....',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 7828,
'title' => 'Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br />
<br />
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br />
<br />
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br />
<br />
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br />
<br />
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br />
<br />
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br />
<br />
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br />
<br />
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br />
<br />
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 24 May, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/24190339/Come-out-with-suitable-compens.html',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 7927,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 7828
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K....'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K...."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />“We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don’t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners”? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />“What was the urgency involved?” the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047e016be6f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047e016be6f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 7828,
'title' => 'Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br />
<br />
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br />
<br />
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br />
<br />
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br />
<br />
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br />
<br />
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br />
<br />
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br />
<br />
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br />
<br />
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 24 May, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/24190339/Come-out-with-suitable-compens.html',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 7927,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 7828,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice',
'metaDesc' => '
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K....',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 7828,
'title' => 'Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br />
<br />
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br />
<br />
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br />
<br />
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br />
<br />
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br />
<br />
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br />
<br />
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br />
<br />
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br />
<br />
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 24 May, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/24190339/Come-out-with-suitable-compens.html',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 7927,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 7828
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K....'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a &ldquo;reasonable compensation policy&rdquo; to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />&ldquo;We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don&rsquo;t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners&rdquo;? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />&ldquo;What was the urgency involved?&rdquo; the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K...."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />“We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don’t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners”? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />“What was the urgency involved?” the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 7828,
'title' => 'Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br />
<br />
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br />
<br />
“We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don’t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners”? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br />
<br />
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br />
<br />
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br />
<br />
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br />
<br />
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br />
<br />
“What was the urgency involved?” the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br />
<br />
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br />
<br />
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br />
<br />
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 24 May, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/24190339/Come-out-with-suitable-compens.html',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 7927,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 7828,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice',
'metaDesc' => '
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K....',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />“We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don’t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners”? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />“What was the urgency involved?” the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 7828,
'title' => 'Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br />
<br />
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br />
<br />
“We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don’t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners”? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br />
<br />
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br />
<br />
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br />
<br />
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br />
<br />
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br />
<br />
“What was the urgency involved?” the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br />
<br />
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br />
<br />
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br />
<br />
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 24 May, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/24190339/Come-out-with-suitable-compens.html',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 7927,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 7828
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K....'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.<br /><br />A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.<br /><br />“We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don’t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners”? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.<br /><br />The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.<br /><br />Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.<br /><br />The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.<br /><br />Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.<br /><br />The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.<br /><br />“What was the urgency involved?” the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.<br /><br />Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.<br /><br />Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.<br /><br />However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/come-out-with-suitable-compensation-policy-for-land-owners-sc-7927.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC | Im4change.org
Come out with suitable compensation policy for land owners: SC
Amidst growing land acquisition rows across the country, the Supreme Court today suggested the government come out with a “reasonable compensation policy” to meet the genuine grievances of land owners.
A vacation bench of justices G. S. Singhvi and C. K. Prasad felt if a proper monetary compensation policy was evolved by the government the frequent disputes over acquisition of lands by government would not arise.
“We think if the state formulates a reasonable compensation policy, then these type of disputes would not arise. We are frequently witnessing these type of problems. Why don’t you come out with a proper compensation policy for the land owners”? the bench told Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra.
The counsel agreed with the suggestion that a proper compensation policy ought to be set up to avert such disputes. He said the government was already in the process of coming out with a suitable mechanism to deal with the issue.
Bhatta Parasul in Uttar Pradesh was in the news recently over alleged arbitrary land acquisition by Mayawati government even as the Singur and Nandigram land acquisition disputes were considered to be a prime factor for the recent rout of the CPM-led Left Front government in West Bengal.
The apex court made the remarks while granting time to Delhi government to explore a compromise with certain land owners at Harsh Vihar whose 80 acres were acquired for the ostensible purpose of setting up a power grid by Delhi Transco for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.
Darshan Lal Nagpal and other owners had moved the apex court after the Delhi high court upheld the acquisition of their land by the government.
The bench ticked off the government for invoking the urgency clause under Section 17 provided under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring the land without even extending a formal hearing to the aggrieved land owners.
“What was the urgency involved?” the bench said pointing out that while the actual proposal for acquiring the land was made as early as in 2005, the land was actually acquired in October 2009.
Under Section 5A of the Act the government has to give a mandatory hearing to the aggrieved land owners before acquiring the land. However, in emergency cases by resorting to Section 17, the government can acquire the land even without extending any hearing to the owners.
Hence, it asked the Additional Solicitor General to work out a compromise formula with the land owners for paying them suitable compensation and posted the matter for further hearing to next Monday.
However, the apex court permitted the government to lay the necessary road on the acquired land for transporting the material to the grid, subject to the condition that it would be dismantled if the final verdict goes against the administration.
