Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 2 August, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture,chemical fortification,dietary diversity,Folic Acid,Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,Fortification,fortification of edible oil,fortification of edible oil and milk,fortification of food and edible oils,fortification of milk,FSSAI,Iron,Kisan Swaraj,Protein intake,Rice fortification,Toxicity,Vitamin A,Vitamin B12,Vitamin D&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot; title=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 2 August, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 8 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 9 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 10 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 11 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 12 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 13 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 14 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 15 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 16 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 17 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 18 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 60325
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture,chemical fortification,dietary diversity,Folic Acid,Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,Fortification,fortification of edible oil,fortification of edible oil and milk,fortification of food and edible oils,fortification of milk,FSSAI,Iron,Kisan Swaraj,Protein intake,Rice fortification,Toxicity,Vitamin A,Vitamin B12,Vitamin D&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot; title=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Individuals and organisations <a href="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf" title="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf">sent a letter to FSSAI</a> saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &ldquo;easy intervention&rdquo; and a &ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories underline that FSSAI&rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &ldquo;Reference 6&rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts" title="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 2 August, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture,chemical fortification,dietary diversity,Folic Acid,Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,Fortification,fortification of edible oil,fortification of edible oil and milk,fortification of food and edible oils,fortification of milk,FSSAI,Iron,Kisan Swaraj,Protein intake,Rice fortification,Toxicity,Vitamin A,Vitamin B12,Vitamin D&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot; title=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 2 August, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 8 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 9 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 10 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 11 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 12 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 13 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 14 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 15 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 16 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 17 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 18 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 60325
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture,chemical fortification,dietary diversity,Folic Acid,Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,Fortification,fortification of edible oil,fortification of edible oil and milk,fortification of food and edible oils,fortification of milk,FSSAI,Iron,Kisan Swaraj,Protein intake,Rice fortification,Toxicity,Vitamin A,Vitamin B12,Vitamin D&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot; title=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Individuals and organisations <a href="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf" title="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf">sent a letter to FSSAI</a> saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &ldquo;easy intervention&rdquo; and a &ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories underline that FSSAI&rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &ldquo;Reference 6&rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts" title="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ee7b184e13f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 2 August, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture,chemical fortification,dietary diversity,Folic Acid,Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,Fortification,fortification of edible oil,fortification of edible oil and milk,fortification of food and edible oils,fortification of milk,FSSAI,Iron,Kisan Swaraj,Protein intake,Rice fortification,Toxicity,Vitamin A,Vitamin B12,Vitamin D&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot; title=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 60325,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 2 August, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 8 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 9 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 10 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 11 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 12 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 13 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 14 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 15 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 16 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 17 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 18 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 60325
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture,chemical fortification,dietary diversity,Folic Acid,Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,Fortification,fortification of edible oil,fortification of edible oil and milk,fortification of food and edible oils,fortification of milk,FSSAI,Iron,Kisan Swaraj,Protein intake,Rice fortification,Toxicity,Vitamin A,Vitamin B12,Vitamin D&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Individuals and organisations &lt;a href=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot; title=&quot;/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf&quot;&gt;sent a letter to FSSAI&lt;/a&gt; saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government&amp;rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&amp;rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &amp;ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&amp;rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&amp;rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &amp;ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&amp;rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &amp;nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &amp;ldquo;easy intervention&amp;rdquo; and a &amp;ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &amp;ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The signatories underline that FSSAI&amp;rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &amp;ldquo;Reference 6&amp;rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Individuals and organisations <a href="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf" title="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf">sent a letter to FSSAI</a> saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &ldquo;easy intervention&rdquo; and a &ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories underline that FSSAI&rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &ldquo;Reference 6&rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts" title="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 60325,
		'title' => 'Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts',
		'subheading' => null,
		'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Individuals and organisations <a href="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf">sent a letter to FSSAI</a> saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.</em></p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &ldquo;easy intervention&rdquo; and a &ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The signatories underline that FSSAI&rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &ldquo;Reference 6&rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
		'credit_writer' => 'Newsclick.in, 2 August, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts',
		'meta_title' => '',
		'meta_keywords' => '',
		'meta_description' => '',
		'noindex' => (int) 1,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => null,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 60325,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture,chemical fortification,dietary diversity,Folic Acid,Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,Fortification,fortification of edible oil,fortification of edible oil and milk,fortification of food and edible oils,fortification of milk,FSSAI,Iron,Kisan Swaraj,Protein intake,Rice fortification,Toxicity,Vitamin A,Vitamin B12,Vitamin D',
	'metaDesc' => '-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the...',
	'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Individuals and organisations <a href="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf" title="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf">sent a letter to FSSAI</a> saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &ldquo;easy intervention&rdquo; and a &ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories underline that FSSAI&rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &ldquo;Reference 6&rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts" title="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 60325,
	'title' => 'Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts',
	'subheading' => null,
	'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Individuals and organisations <a href="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf">sent a letter to FSSAI</a> saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.</em></p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &ldquo;easy intervention&rdquo; and a &ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The signatories underline that FSSAI&rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &ldquo;Reference 6&rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
	'credit_writer' => 'Newsclick.in, 2 August, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'concerned-citizens-ask-fssai-to-not-make-food-fortification-mandatory-warn-of-health-and-economic-impacts',
	'meta_title' => '',
	'meta_keywords' => '',
	'meta_description' => '',
	'noindex' => (int) 1,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => null,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 9 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 10 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 11 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 12 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 13 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 14 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 15 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 16 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 17 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 18 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 60325
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts'
$metaKeywords = 'Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture,chemical fortification,dietary diversity,Folic Acid,Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,Fortification,fortification of edible oil,fortification of edible oil and milk,fortification of food and edible oils,fortification of milk,FSSAI,Iron,Kisan Swaraj,Protein intake,Rice fortification,Toxicity,Vitamin A,Vitamin B12,Vitamin D'
$metaDesc = '-Newsclick.in

Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.

The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the...'
$disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Individuals and organisations <a href="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf" title="/upload/files/ASHAs%20letter%20to%20FFRC%20on%20mandatory%20fortification%20Aug%202021.pdf">sent a letter to FSSAI</a> saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The Indian government&rsquo;s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers&rsquo; organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing &ldquo;anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country&rdquo;. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India&rsquo;s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. &ldquo;Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,&rdquo; said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets. &nbsp;The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an &ldquo;easy intervention&rdquo; and a &ldquo;cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: &ldquo;If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?&rdquo;&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The signatories underline that FSSAI&rsquo;s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as &ldquo;Reference 6&rdquo; which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts" title="https://www.newsclick.in/concerned-citizens-FSSAI-food-nortification-mandatory-warn-health-economic-impacts">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Concerned Citizens Ask FSSAI to Not Make Food Fortification Mandatory, Warn of Health and Economic Impacts

-Newsclick.in Individuals and organisations sent a letter to FSSAI saying that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. The Indian government’s plans to make mandatory the artificial fortification of certain food items has raised concerns as 170 individuals and organisations on Saturday wrote to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) urging it to scrap such plans. The signatories, including the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, said that the synthetic or chemical fortification of foods could have a range of negative on health and the economy. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favour of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, lack of independent and conclusive evidence for fortification, among other concerns. Among the signatories were medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers’ organisations, academics, civil society organisations and concerned citizens. In January this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on the mandatory fortification of edible oil and packaged milk with Vitamin A and D. Meanwhile, the government is also considering making rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024. The government has also started a three-year pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in one district in 15 states each citing “anaemia and micro-nutrient deficiency in the country”. Since April, the government has also been distributing fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program for the same reasons.  The signatories of the letter see this push for fortified food as problematic. The letter sent to FSSAI says that the chemical fortification of food is not a solution as nutrients do not work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. It points out that India’s undernourished population faced the problem of calorie intake and protein inadequacy due to monotonous cereal-based diets that are low on vegetables and animal protein. The letter argues that adding one or two synthetic vitamins and minerals will not solve the bigger issue, and even lead to toxicity in an undernourished population.  Experts point out that the efficacy of fortification has been inconclusive so far. “Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,” said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition, in a press release regarding the letter sent to the FSSAI.  To an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to the FSSAI in November last year, the regulator had responded saying that it saw fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets.  The Food Fortification Resource Centre, under FSSAI, said in the response that fortification was an “easy intervention” and a “cost-effective way of providing nutrition to the masses.”  Thus, the latest letter by the citizens and organisations raised the question against the move to make fortification mandatory: “If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?”  The signatories underline that FSSAI’s intentions are questionable since, to defend fortification, the regulator has cited studies that are funded by industry bodies who could profit from such a move. For instance, in its response to the letter sent back in 2020, FSSAI had cited a study cited as “Reference 6” which was funded by the Nestle Nutrition Institute, an arm of a corporation that sells fortified foods and will directly benefit by such studies, the latest letter points out. Please click here to read more.