Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25308, 'title' => 'Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. </p> <p align="justify"> Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 4 July, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140705/jsp/nation/story_18583751.jsp#.U7hbaGNbXyc', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673342, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25308, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGS,NREGA,food inflation,Inflation,food prices,price rise', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot;</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot;</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25308, 'title' => 'Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. </p> <p align="justify"> Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 4 July, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140705/jsp/nation/story_18583751.jsp#.U7hbaGNbXyc', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673342, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25308 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGS,NREGA,food inflation,Inflation,food prices,price rise' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot;</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot;</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Cong price pot versus Modi kettle</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of "insulting" the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">"Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">"Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors," it said. "On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern."</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. "Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">"Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?"</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: "We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards."</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the "economist PM" for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made "this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?"</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a "crude joke" he said: "All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime."</p><p align="justify">He cited the "copied" decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">"Where are the new ideas?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: "Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain)."</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25308, 'title' => 'Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. </p> <p align="justify"> Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 4 July, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140705/jsp/nation/story_18583751.jsp#.U7hbaGNbXyc', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673342, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25308, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGS,NREGA,food inflation,Inflation,food prices,price rise', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot;</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot;</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25308, 'title' => 'Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. </p> <p align="justify"> Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 4 July, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140705/jsp/nation/story_18583751.jsp#.U7hbaGNbXyc', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673342, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25308 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGS,NREGA,food inflation,Inflation,food prices,price rise' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot;</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot;</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Cong price pot versus Modi kettle</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of "insulting" the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">"Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">"Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors," it said. "On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern."</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. "Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">"Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?"</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: "We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards."</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the "economist PM" for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made "this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?"</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a "crude joke" he said: "All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime."</p><p align="justify">He cited the "copied" decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">"Where are the new ideas?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: "Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain)."</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ecc3fbce8a8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25308, 'title' => 'Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. </p> <p align="justify"> Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 4 July, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140705/jsp/nation/story_18583751.jsp#.U7hbaGNbXyc', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673342, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25308, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGS,NREGA,food inflation,Inflation,food prices,price rise', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot;</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot;</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25308, 'title' => 'Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. </p> <p align="justify"> Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 4 July, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140705/jsp/nation/story_18583751.jsp#.U7hbaGNbXyc', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673342, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25308 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGS,NREGA,food inflation,Inflation,food prices,price rise' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of &quot;insulting&quot; the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors,&quot; it said. &quot;On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. &quot;Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?&quot;</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: &quot;We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the &quot;economist PM&quot; for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made &quot;this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?&quot;</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a &quot;crude joke&quot; he said: &quot;All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He cited the &quot;copied&quot; decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Where are the new ideas?&quot; he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: &quot;Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain).&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Cong price pot versus Modi kettle</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of "insulting" the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">"Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">"Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors," it said. "On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern."</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. "Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">"Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?"</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: "We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards."</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the "economist PM" for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made "this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?"</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a "crude joke" he said: "All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime."</p><p align="justify">He cited the "copied" decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">"Where are the new ideas?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: "Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain)."</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25308, 'title' => 'Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. </p> <p align="justify"> Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of "insulting" the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. </p> <p align="justify"> "Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?" he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. </p> <p align="justify"> "Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors," it said. "On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern." </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala targeted this paragraph. "Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?" he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> "Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?" </p> <p align="justify"> When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala spewed rhetoric: "We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards." </p> <p align="justify"> Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the "economist PM" for offering this argument. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made "this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?" </p> <p align="justify"> Describing the argument as a "crude joke" he said: "All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime." </p> <p align="justify"> He cited the "copied" decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. </p> <p align="justify"> "Where are the new ideas?" he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: "Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain)." </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 4 July, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140705/jsp/nation/story_18583751.jsp#.U7hbaGNbXyc', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673342, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25308, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGS,NREGA,food inflation,Inflation,food prices,price rise', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of "insulting" the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">"Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">"Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors," it said. "On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern."</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. "Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">"Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?"</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: "We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards."</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the "economist PM" for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made "this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?"</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a "crude joke" he said: "All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime."</p><p align="justify">He cited the "copied" decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">"Where are the new ideas?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: "Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain)."</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25308, 'title' => 'Cong price pot versus Modi kettle', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. </p> <p align="justify"> Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of "insulting" the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. </p> <p align="justify"> "Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?" he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. </p> <p align="justify"> "Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors," it said. "On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern." </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala targeted this paragraph. "Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?" he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> "Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?" </p> <p align="justify"> When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala spewed rhetoric: "We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards." </p> <p align="justify"> Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. </p> <p align="justify"> Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the "economist PM" for offering this argument. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made "this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?" </p> <p align="justify"> Describing the argument as a "crude joke" he said: "All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime." </p> <p align="justify"> He cited the "copied" decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. </p> <p align="justify"> "Where are the new ideas?" he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. </p> <p align="justify"> Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: "Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain)." </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 4 July, 2014, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140705/jsp/nation/story_18583751.jsp#.U7hbaGNbXyc', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cong-price-pot-versus-modi-kettle-4673342', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673342, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25308 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cong price pot versus Modi kettle' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGS,NREGA,food inflation,Inflation,food prices,price rise' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power. Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Congress today slammed the Centre for linking food inflation to increased incomes and changing diets and asked if it intended to scrap its predecessor's welfare schemes that had raised poor families' purchasing power.</p><p align="justify">Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of "insulting" the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising.</p><p align="justify">"Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution.</p><p align="justify">"Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors," it said. "On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern."</p><p align="justify">Surjewala targeted this paragraph. "Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">"Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?"</p><p align="justify">When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala spewed rhetoric: "We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards."</p><p align="justify">Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices.</p><p align="justify">Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the "economist PM" for offering this argument.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made "this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?"</p><p align="justify">Describing the argument as a "crude joke" he said: "All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime."</p><p align="justify">He cited the "copied" decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders.</p><p align="justify">"Where are the new ideas?" he asked.</p><p align="justify">The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares.</p><p align="justify">Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: "Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain)."</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Cong price pot versus Modi kettle |
-The Telegraph
Ironically, Congress ministers used to cite similar reasons for the rising prices. But spokesperson Randeep Surjewala accused the government of "insulting" the people and said it was a matter of satisfaction and pride that incomes were rising. "Is the Modi government opposed to the rising incomes and better dietary habits of our people?" he asked. The issue stemmed from the agenda paper prepared by the Union consumer affairs ministry for today's conference of state ministers and secretaries of consumer affairs, food and public distribution. "Food inflation is caused by both demand and supply factors," it said. "On demand side, the important factors that have contributed to inflation are government's increased public expenditure like MNREGA, rising per capita income, population growth and changing dietary pattern." Surjewala targeted this paragraph. "Has the Modi government come to power only to help business in the garb of strengthening the economy and (does it) plan to discard all the welfare schemes?" he asked. "Is it against a qualitative improvement in the food habits of our population? Is the Modi government ready to accept the demand by Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje for scrapping the MNREGA?" When he was Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh too had told Parliament that the rise in rural populations' purchasing potential - which he attributed to his government's welfare schemes - had raised demand and pushed up prices. Surjewala spewed rhetoric: "We are proud that the 10-year rule by the UPA led to all-round prosperity, higher rural wages and better dietary standards." Now that the Modi government too appears to have accepted that development, at least by implication, the Congress had the option of focusing on claiming credit for its good work. Instead, it chose to attack the government's economic logic that rising incomes were raising prices. Opposition politics has its own dynamics, though, and the BJP too had never accepted that economic logic in the past. Its spokespersons and Modi himself had taunted the "economist PM" for offering this argument. Surjewala today cited information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar's remark that inflation control was not a switch-on-switch-off job to ask the BJP when it had made "this earthshaking discovery - after May 26?" Describing the argument as a "crude joke" he said: "All the initiatives taken by the Modi government (have been) copied from the previous regime." He cited the "copied" decisions: raising the onion export price, deregistering fruits and vegetables from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, restricting the stock limit and directing the states to act against hoarders. "Where are the new ideas?" he asked. The Congress also argued that the government's vaunted efforts to control inflation had been negated by the decision to increase the prices of petrol, diesel, LPG and sugar and hike railway fares. Surjewala mocked the BJP's poll slogan, saying: "Modi sarkar, layi mehngai aur hahakar (the Modi government has brought inflation and cries of pain)." |