Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 4 February, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2859269.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12989,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 4 February, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2859269.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12989,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 12869
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify"><em>It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.<br /><br />The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.<br /><br />The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre's claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.<br /><br />Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.<br /><br />He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &ldquo;fake encounter&rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre's view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.<br /><br />However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government's sanction.<br /><br />Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&rdquo;<br /><br />He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 4 February, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2859269.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12989,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 4 February, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2859269.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12989,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 12869
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify"><em>It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.<br /><br />The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.<br /><br />The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre's claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.<br /><br />Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.<br /><br />He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &ldquo;fake encounter&rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre's view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.<br /><br />However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government's sanction.<br /><br />Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&rdquo;<br /><br />He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f13174b3ae6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 4 February, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2859269.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12989,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 12869,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 4 February, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2859269.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12989,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 12869
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre&#039;s claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &amp;ldquo;fake encounter&amp;rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &amp;ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre&#039;s view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government&#039;s sanction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &amp;ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify"><em>It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.<br /><br />The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.<br /><br />The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre's claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.<br /><br />Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.<br /><br />He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &ldquo;fake encounter&rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre's view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.<br /><br />However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government's sanction.<br /><br />Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&rdquo;<br /><br />He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 12869,
		'title' => 'Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
<em>It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief<br />
</em><br />
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.<br />
<br />
The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.<br />
<br />
The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre's claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.<br />
<br />
He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &ldquo;fake encounter&rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre's view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.<br />
<br />
However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government's sanction.<br />
<br />
Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 4 February, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2859269.ece',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 12989,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 12869,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA,Law and Justice',
	'metaDesc' => '

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify"><em>It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.<br /><br />The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.<br /><br />The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre's claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.<br /><br />Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.<br /><br />He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &ldquo;fake encounter&rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre's view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.<br /><br />However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government's sanction.<br /><br />Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&rdquo;<br /><br />He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 12869,
	'title' => 'Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
<em>It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief<br />
</em><br />
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.<br />
<br />
The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.<br />
<br />
The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre's claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.<br />
<br />
He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &ldquo;fake encounter&rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre's view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.<br />
<br />
However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government's sanction.<br />
<br />
Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 4 February, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2859269.ece',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'court-grills-cbi-over-its-pathribal-probe-by-j-venkatesan-12989',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 12989,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 12869
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.

The CBI has initiated a...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify"><em>It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it.<br /><br />The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&amp;K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too.<br /><br />The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre's claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&amp;K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned.<br /><br />Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet.<br /><br />He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of &ldquo;fake encounter&rdquo; were actually planted by Army personnel. &ldquo;Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre's view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army.<br /><br />However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government's sanction.<br /><br />Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. &ldquo;And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.&rdquo;<br /><br />He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Court grills CBI over its Pathribal probe by J Venkatesan

It seeks statement fromthe Special Task Force chief The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to answer certain questions relating to the 2000 Pathribal encounter case in Jammu and Kashmir initiated by it. The CBI has initiated a case against five Army officers involved in an alleged fake encounter since the Army did not take any action under the Army Act and also did not allow the criminal courts from proceeding with the prosecution. A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar asked the CBI to answer the following questions on the next date of hearing on February 24. Where did the weapons found on the deceased come from? How did the agency establish they were planted? Had it verified the communications between the Army and the Special Task Force while planning the operation? Did the J&K Police register an FIR that there had been five deaths? The Bench sought the statement of the STF chief too. The Bench is hearing petitions relating to the Centre's claim of immunity and applicability of the controversial Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in the North East and J&K. The CBI, on the other hand, had registered cases against Army men treating some of the killings as encounter deaths and filed charge sheets in the courts concerned. Senior counsel Ashok Bhan, appearing for the CBI, made it clear to the Bench that no sanction was required either under the AFSPA or the Cr.PC for prosecution of Army officers allegedly involved in the Pathribal fake encounter. Mr. Bhan said the question of sanction would arise only after cognisance had been taken by a magistrate but in the present decade-old case the Army chose to challenge the prosecution at the time of the charge sheet. He said the so-called weapons recovered from the scene of “fake encounter” were actually planted by Army personnel. “Therefore, it is a case of fake encounter murders, which cannot be immune under Section 6 and 7 of the AFSPA. So it will come under the ordinary penal law of the country; the CBI does not need prior sanction,” he said. Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the Defence Ministry, sought time for placing on record the Centre's view on the controversy between the CBI and the Army. However, Additional Solicitor-General P.P. Malhotra said Section 6 and 7 contemplates that the institution of any proceedings must necessarily have the Central government's sanction. Mr. Malhotra said the Army had to work under hostile conditions to counter terrorist activities. “And the Army is not voluntarily there. It is there at the request of the State government in the disturbed areas of Kashmir, which have been declared as disturbed under The Disturbed Areas Act.” He said the Army did not act independently but in aid of the local police and the civil authorities for maintenance of public order and counter-terrorist activities.