Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 November, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article916408.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4516,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;SEZ,Land&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 November, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article916408.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4516,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4425
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;SEZ,Land&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.</font><br /><br /><font >A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.</font><br /><br /><font >Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.</font><br /><br /><font >These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.</font><br /><br /><font >Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &mdash; K. Raheja &amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government's decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.</font><br /><br /><font >If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.</font><br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 November, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article916408.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4516,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;SEZ,Land&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 November, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article916408.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4516,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4425
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;SEZ,Land&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.</font><br /><br /><font >A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.</font><br /><br /><font >Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.</font><br /><br /><font >These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.</font><br /><br /><font >Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &mdash; K. Raheja &amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government's decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.</font><br /><br /><font >If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.</font><br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68047ee80e2dc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 November, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article916408.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4516,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;SEZ,Land&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4425,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 November, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article916408.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4516,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4425
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;SEZ,Land&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government&#039;s power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &amp;mdash; K. Raheja &amp;amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp;amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government&#039;s decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.</font><br /><br /><font >A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.</font><br /><br /><font >Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.</font><br /><br /><font >These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.</font><br /><br /><font >Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &mdash; K. Raheja &amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government's decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.</font><br /><br /><font >If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.</font><br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 4425,
		'title' => 'Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br />
</font>
<div align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &mdash; K. Raheja &amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government's decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.</font><br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 November, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article916408.ece',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4516,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 4425,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC',
	'metaKeywords' => 'SEZ,Land',
	'metaDesc' => '


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy...',
	'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.</font><br /><br /><font >A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.</font><br /><br /><font >Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.</font><br /><br /><font >These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.</font><br /><br /><font >Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &mdash; K. Raheja &amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government's decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.</font><br /><br /><font >If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.</font><br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 4425,
	'title' => 'Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br />
</font>
<div align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &mdash; K. Raheja &amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government's decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.</font><br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 November, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article916408.ece',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'court-quashes-allotment-of-land-on-lease-by-gidc-4516',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4516,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 4425
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC'
$metaKeywords = 'SEZ,Land'
$metaDesc = '


The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy...'
$disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest.</font><br /><br /><font >A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners.</font><br /><br /><font >Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs.</font><br /><br /><font >These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008.</font><br /><br /><font >Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters &mdash; K. Raheja &amp; Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics &amp; Distribution Pvt. Ltd.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government's decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation.</font><br /><br /><font >If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said.</font><br /><br /><font >The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.</font><br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Court quashes allotment of land on lease by GIDC

The Bombay High Court at Goa on Friday quashed the allotment of land on lease by the State-owned industry promotion body to the promoters of seven Special Economic Zone(SEZ) projects upholding the State Government's power to scrap the SEZ policy and the projects in public interest. A Bench comprising Justice A. S. Oka and Justice F. M. Reis, inter alia ruled that that there was lack of fairness and transparency in allotment of land by the Goa Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Moreover, the action of allotment showed lack of application of mind. The action was thus illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. However, it ordered the status quo be maintained for four months from the day of judgment as regards the lands in question by the GIDC and the petitioners. Simultaneously, it observed that their applications can be considered afresh by the GIDC for allotment of the same lands for any lawful purpose except for setting up of SEZs. These SEZ projects include three which were notified by the Central SEZ authorities, and four others which were earlier recommended by the State government; but their recommendations were withdrawn after scrapping the SEZ policy in December 2008. Over 30 lakh square metres of land at different industrial estates was allotted to the seven promoters — K. Raheja & Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease Pvt. Ltd., Meditab Specialties Pvt. Ltd., Peninsula Pharma Research Centre, The Planetview Mercantile Co. Ltd., Inox Mercantile Company Pvt. Ltd., and Paradigm Logistics & Distribution Pvt. Ltd. The Court ruled that the contention of the parties that the State government's decision to scrap the SEZ policy and SEZ projects cannot be considered an arbitrary or illegal decision. The decision was guided by public interest and, therefore, the Court held that it would be inequitable to hold the State government or the GIDC bound by its alleged promise and representation. If fresh allotment cannot be made, the GIDC will have to refund the amounts received towards deposit, lease premium, interest and rent at the time of the companies handing over the possession of lands, the Court said. The Court has said that in those cases where approvals are not granted under the SEZ Act, it is obvious that the proposals cannot be processed further as the government of Goa has withdrawn the recommendation. Therefore, no fault can be found with the Central government holding that such proposals shall be treated as dropped in as much as the recommendation is necessary for grant of the approval. Clarifying its order for status quo for four months, the Court said petitioners shall not carry on any further constructions on the said lands and shall not hereafter create any third-party rights in respect of the lands for a period of four months. The GIDC should not dispossess the petitioners for four months and shall not make allotments of the said lands to any third parties during the said period. If within four months no fresh allotment is made by the GIDC, on expiry of said four months, it is open for the GIDC to take steps in accordance with law to take possession of the said lands.