Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3390, 'title' => 'Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 September, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article741115.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3478, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3390, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3390, 'title' => 'Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 September, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article741115.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3478, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3390 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away… What are we up to?”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, “The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: “What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?” Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3390, 'title' => 'Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 September, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article741115.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3478, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3390, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3390, 'title' => 'Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 September, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article741115.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3478, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3390 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away… What are we up to?”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, “The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: “What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?” Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814216aefd96-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6814216aefd96-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3390, 'title' => 'Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 September, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article741115.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3478, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3390, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3390, 'title' => 'Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 September, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article741115.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3478, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3390 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to &ldquo;state-sponsored terrorism.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: &ldquo;Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away&hellip; What are we up to?&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, &ldquo;The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?&rdquo; Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away… What are we up to?”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, “The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: “What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?” Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3390, 'title' => 'Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away… What are we up to?”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, “The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: “What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?” Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 September, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article741115.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3478, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3390, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away… What are we up to?”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, “The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: “What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?” Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3390, 'title' => 'Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away… What are we up to?”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, “The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: “What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?” Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 September, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article741115.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-slams-u-p-s-land-acquisition-policy-by-j-venkatesan-3478', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3478, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3390 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Taking over farmers' lands without following due procedure akin to state-sponsored terrorism: judge</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away… What are we up to?”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, “The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: “What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?” Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Court slams U.P.'s land acquisition policy by J Venkatesan |
The Supreme Court on Monday slammed the land acquisition policy of the Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh and said any acquisition that deprived farmers of their land without following the due procedure was akin to “state-sponsored terrorism.” A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly was hearing appeals filed by farmers challenging the Allahabad High Court order upholding the land acquisition notification invoking the urgency provision and dispensing with the mandatory procedure of receiving objections. The Bench issued notice to the State on the appeal by Radhay Shyam and other farmers from Noida, on the outskirts of Delhi, against the December 15, 2008 court decision. Expressing anguish, Justice Singhvi told Additional Advocate-General Shail Dwivedi, appearing for the State: “Throwing out villagers from their land and taking away their livelihood and way of life is state-sponsored terrorism. Land cultivated by them for generations is taken away. Half of the compensation awarded to them is also taken away… What are we up to?” Finding fault with the High Court order, the judge said, “The High Court should have at least heard the farmers instead of throwing out their case summarily. The High Court doesn't even think it proper to hear them out, that approach is perverse and absolutely unjust.” When Mr. Dwivedi said the landowners were willing to settle, Justice Singhvi said: “What is the choice in the face of the might of the state? What else can they do or say? Is this the way to exercise powers [under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act]?” Mr. Dwivedi agreed that the land could not be taken away without giving the landowners a hearing. The petitioners contended that the State government had no material to show that the acquisition was urgent. They claimed that it was the lands on which they had built houses 40 years ago in Gautambudh Nagar and such homesteads were exempt from acquisition under the State's own policy. There was no material to invoke the urgency clause and to dispense with the procedure of raising objections. They sought quashing of the High Court judgment. |