Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2973, 'title' => 'Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/27/stories/2010082753231000.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3060, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2973, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'metaKeywords' => 'education', 'metaDesc' => ' The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2973, 'title' => 'Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/27/stories/2010082753231000.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3060, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2973 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas' $metaKeywords = 'education' $metaDesc = ' The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V — whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2973, 'title' => 'Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/27/stories/2010082753231000.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3060, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2973, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'metaKeywords' => 'education', 'metaDesc' => ' The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2973, 'title' => 'Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/27/stories/2010082753231000.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3060, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2973 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas' $metaKeywords = 'education' $metaDesc = ' The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V — whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ec1777178c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ec1777178c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2973, 'title' => 'Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/27/stories/2010082753231000.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3060, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2973, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'metaKeywords' => 'education', 'metaDesc' => ' The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2973, 'title' => 'Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/27/stories/2010082753231000.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3060, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2973 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas' $metaKeywords = 'education' $metaDesc = ' The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V &mdash; whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V — whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2973, 'title' => 'Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V — whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/27/stories/2010082753231000.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3060, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2973, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'metaKeywords' => 'education', 'metaDesc' => ' The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V — whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2973, 'title' => 'Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V — whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/27/stories/2010082753231000.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'court-to-decide-on-100-p-c-quota-for-sts-in-tribal-areas-3060', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3060, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2973 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas' $metaKeywords = 'education' $metaDesc = ' The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a Constitution Bench for hearing an important question of law as to whether 100 per cent reservation in posts for teachers could be made in favour of Scheduled Tribes in schools in scheduled areas.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V — whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Court to decide on 100 p.c. quota for STs in tribal areas |
A Bench, comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, referred the appeal to Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia for posting it before a Constitution Bench. The special leave petition (SLP) was directed against a Full Court judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court that upheld a Government Order (G.O.), which provided for 100 per cent reservation for tribals. The Constitution Bench will also decide whether such reservation was ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution or not. It will also consider the scope of paragraph 5 (1), Schedule V — whether the exercise of power conferred therein could override fundamental rights; does the power extend to subordinate legislation; and does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law. Andhra Pradesh created about 1,500 posts of primary school teachers under the control of the zilla parishad or mandal parishad in villages where there were no schools. It issued a G.O. that provided for 100 per cent reservation of such posts for Scheduled Tribes. The notification issued by the Governor said the object of providing such reservation was to increase the literacy in scheduled areas, which could be achieved by ensuring the presence of a teacher in every school there. Though the State Administrative Tribunal quashed the G.O., the High Court upheld it. The SLP is directed against this judgment. It was submitted in the SLP that the High Court judgment was contrary to the basic structure of the Constitution. It was also contended that the G.O. was discriminatory as it affected not only the open category candidates but also other reserved category candidates. It said reservation under Article 16 (4) should not exceed 50 per cent. Senior counsel L. Nageswara Rao, appearing for appellant Chebrolu Leela Prasad, on Thursday argued that there was no nexus between the classification evolved in the notification in favour of one local Scheduled Tribe and the object purportedly sought to be achieved. He said the provision of reservation for only one local Scheduled Tribe was violative of the concept of reservation and sought the quashing of the impugned judgment. |