Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Courts can see House reports&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 May, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4684577,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports,Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine,Cervical Cancer,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Courts can see House reports&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 May, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4684577,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 36462
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports,Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine,Cervical Cancer,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Courts can see House reports</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.<br /><br />The apex court, however, said &quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&quot; the Supreme Court said.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&quot; it added.<br /><br />The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.<br /><br />The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.<br /><br />The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.<br /><br />The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.<br /><br />The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Courts can see House reports&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 May, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4684577,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports,Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine,Cervical Cancer,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Courts can see House reports&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 May, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4684577,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 36462
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports,Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine,Cervical Cancer,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Courts can see House reports</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.<br /><br />The apex court, however, said &quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&quot; the Supreme Court said.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&quot; it added.<br /><br />The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.<br /><br />The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.<br /><br />The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.<br /><br />The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.<br /><br />The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fc2b7ba49f6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Courts can see House reports&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 May, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4684577,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports,Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine,Cervical Cancer,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 36462,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Courts can see House reports&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 May, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4684577,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 36462
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports,Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine,Cervical Cancer,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre&#039;s argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court, however, said &amp;quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&amp;quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&amp;quot; the Supreme Court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&amp;quot; it added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Courts can see House reports</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.<br /><br />The apex court, however, said &quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&quot; the Supreme Court said.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&quot; it added.<br /><br />The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.<br /><br />The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.<br /><br />The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.<br /><br />The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.<br /><br />The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 36462,
		'title' => 'Courts can see House reports',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.<br />
<br />
The apex court, however, said &quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.<br />
<br />
&quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&quot; the Supreme Court said.<br />
<br />
&quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&quot; it added.<br />
<br />
The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.<br />
<br />
The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.<br />
<br />
The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 10 May, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4684577,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 36462,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports,Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine,Cervical Cancer,Supreme Court',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.<br /><br />The apex court, however, said &quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&quot; the Supreme Court said.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&quot; it added.<br /><br />The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.<br /><br />The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.<br /><br />The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.<br /><br />The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.<br /><br />The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 36462,
	'title' => 'Courts can see House reports',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.<br />
<br />
The apex court, however, said &quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.<br />
<br />
&quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&quot; the Supreme Court said.<br />
<br />
&quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&quot; it added.<br />
<br />
The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.<br />
<br />
The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.<br />
<br />
The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.<br />
<br />
The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.<br />
<br />
The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 10 May, 2018, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'courts-can-see-house-reports-4684577',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4684577,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 36462
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Courts can see House reports'
$metaKeywords = 'Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports,Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR),Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine,Cervical Cancer,Supreme Court'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature.<br /><br />The apex court, however, said &quot;admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved&quot;, as it has to be corroborated by other evidence.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act,&quot; the Supreme Court said.<br /><br />&quot;There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous,&quot; it added.<br /><br />The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use.<br /><br />The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer.<br /><br />The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.<br /><br />The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain.<br /><br />The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/courts-can-see-house-reports-229414?ref=india-ft-stry">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Courts can see House reports

-The Telegraph New Delhi: A five-judge Supreme Court constitution bench on Wednesday ruled that parliamentary standing committee reports can be examined by courts for evidence evaluation, rejecting the Centre's argument that it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges and an encroachment into the domain of the legislature. The apex court, however, said "admissibility of a parliamentary committee report in evidence does not mean facts stated in the report stand proved", as it has to be corroborated by other evidence. "There can be no dispute that a parliamentary standing committee report being in the public domain is a public document. Therefore, it is admissible under Section 74 of the Evidence Act and judicial notice can be taken of such a document as envisaged under Section 57(4) of the Evidence Act," the Supreme Court said. "There can be no scintilla of doubt that the said document can be taken on record. As stated earlier, it can be taken aid of to understand and appreciate a statutory provision if it is unclear, ambiguous or incongruous," it added. The bench, which had Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, passed the 338-page judgment while dealing with a PIL filed by social activist Kalpana Mehta and others challenging the justifiability of the action taken by the Drugs Controller General of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in approving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer patients despite a parliamentary standing committee report opposing its use. The vaccine is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Asia and MSD Pharmaceuticals ostensibly for preventing cervical cancer. The petitioners had moved the court seeking a ban on the use of the vaccine as, according to them, several women had died during a pilot immunisation camp in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh. The Centre, defended by attorney-general K.K. Venugopal, and senior advocates Harish Salve and others appearing for the pharma companies opposed any move by the top court to rely on parliamentary standing committee reports, which they claimed amounted to breach of parliamentary privileges. They also said that the courts should not enter into legislative domain. The constitution bench ruled that there was no violation as parliamentary standing committee reports are available in the public domain. Please click here to read more.