Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 29 August, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details...-task-challenging/838573/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9803,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 29 August, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details...-task-challenging/838573/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9803,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9694
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.<br /><br />Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.<br /><br />The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&rdquo;<br /><br />Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&rdquo;. &ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &ldquo;in principle&rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.<br /><br />But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.<br /><br />Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 29 August, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details...-task-challenging/838573/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9803,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 29 August, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details...-task-challenging/838573/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9803,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9694
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.<br /><br />Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.<br /><br />The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&rdquo;<br /><br />Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&rdquo;. &ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &ldquo;in principle&rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.<br /><br />But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.<br /><br />Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9241b8ab40-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 29 August, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details...-task-challenging/838573/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9803,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9694,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 29 August, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details...-task-challenging/838573/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9803,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9694
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &amp;ldquo;challenging task&amp;rdquo; ahead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked what the Parliament&amp;rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp;amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &amp;ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&amp;rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &amp;ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &amp;ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&amp;rdquo;. &amp;ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &amp;ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &amp;ldquo;in principle&amp;rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&amp;rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &amp;ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&amp;rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&amp;rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &amp;ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &amp;ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.<br /><br />Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.<br /><br />The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&rdquo;<br /><br />Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&rdquo;. &ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &ldquo;in principle&rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.<br /><br />But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.<br /><br />Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 9694,
		'title' => 'Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.<br />
<br />
Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.<br />
<br />
The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&rdquo;. &ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &ldquo;in principle&rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.<br />
<br />
But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.<br />
<br />
Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 29 August, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details...-task-challenging/838573/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 9803,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 9694,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh',
	'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill',
	'metaDesc' => '

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.<br /><br />Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.<br /><br />The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&rdquo;<br /><br />Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&rdquo;. &ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &ldquo;in principle&rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.<br /><br />But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.<br /><br />Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 9694,
	'title' => 'Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.<br />
<br />
Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.<br />
<br />
The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&rdquo;. &ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &ldquo;in principle&rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.<br />
<br />
But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.<br />
<br />
Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 29 August, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details...-task-challenging/838573/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'day-after-singhvi-says-god-devil-lie-in-details-task-challenging-by-dk-singh-9803',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 9803,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 9694
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh'
$metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill'
$metaDesc = '

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.

Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo; on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a &ldquo;challenging task&rdquo; ahead.<br /><br />Asked what the Parliament&rsquo;s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law &amp; Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: &ldquo;The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government&rsquo;s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: &ldquo;Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish.<br /><br />The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.&rdquo;<br /><br />Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was &ldquo;a very satisfying outcome&rdquo;. &ldquo;The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: &ldquo;The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed &ldquo;in principle&rdquo; on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens&rsquo; charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism.<br /><br />But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. &ldquo;We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,&rdquo; said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have fought for state autonomy. We don&rsquo;t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, &ldquo;said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal.<br /><br />Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. &ldquo;Federal structure should not be disturbed,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Day after, Singhvi says: God, Devil lie in details... task challenging by DK Singh

A day after Parliament passed a resolution conveying the “sense of the House” on the Lokpal Bill, the Parliamentary Standing Committee which is examining the Bill said today that it has a “challenging task” ahead. Asked what the Parliament’s resolution meant for the Lokpal Bill, which is under consideration of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, and Law & Justice, its chairman, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, told The Indian Express: “The standing committee now has a treasure chest of inputs. Certainly, the most important among them, apart from the government’s Bill, diverse other draft Bills, innumerable representations and evidence of witnesses which will be taken is the sense of both Houses of Parliament conveyed through the resolution and proceedings. The standing committee has to look at its implementability, its constitutionality, and its feasibility.” Asked if the resolution bound the committee to incorporate the three contentious points in the Bill, as desired by Anna Hazare, Singhvi said: “Since both God and Devil lie in details, we have the challenging task of searching for the divine but excluding the devilish. The issues and principles are clear, but to what extent, in what manner and with what content they can be operationalised in a draft Bill is a task before the committee.” Meanwhile, Team Anna member Shanti Bhushan said the resolution was “a very satisfying outcome”. “The two Houses have given a direction to the Standing Committee about what they feel on this issue. Ultimately the matter would come back to the Houses and they have already made clear what they think on this,” he said. Saying that the resolution was binding, he said: “The Parliament is supreme. It has given an almost unanimous resolution. I have already said that this is the most beautiful outcome of the Anna agitation.” The resolution passed by Parliament yesterday stated that it agreed “in principle” on the three issues of setting up Lokayuktas in states, a citizens’ charter, and bringing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal through appropriate mechanism. But during the proceedings in the Lok Sabha, members showed no unanimity on these three points. “We are in favour of Lokayukta, but let (state) governments have their own discretion whether they should be (in the Lokpal Bill) or not,” said Sudip Bandopadhyay of the Trinamool Congress. “We have fought for state autonomy. We don’t want anything against it. This is for states to decide whether to have the Lokayukta or not, “said T K S Elangovan of the DMK, who also opposed placing lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal. Basudeb Acharia of the CPI(M) was in favour of a model Act, which could be adopted by all states. “Federal structure should not be disturbed,” he said. As for a citizens charter, the CPI(M) maintained that there should be a separate law to address public grievances.