Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681668a345b30-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681668a345b30-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681668a345b30-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11130, 'title' => 'Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2631334.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11244, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11130, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11130, 'title' => 'Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2631334.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11244, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11130 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.” Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of ‘right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases “is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the ‘Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond “lingering” doubt in cases involving capital punishment. “This standard has not yet been evolved,” he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the “new human rights dynamic” and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. “Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty — its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681668a345b30-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681668a345b30-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681668a345b30-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11130, 'title' => 'Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2631334.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11244, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11130, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11130, 'title' => 'Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2631334.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11244, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11130 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.” Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of ‘right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases “is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the ‘Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond “lingering” doubt in cases involving capital punishment. “This standard has not yet been evolved,” he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the “new human rights dynamic” and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. “Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty — its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681668a345b30-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681668a345b30-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681668a345b30-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681668a345b30-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11130, 'title' => 'Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2631334.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11244, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11130, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11130, 'title' => 'Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2631334.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11244, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11130 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo; Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty &ldquo;barbaric,&rdquo; &ldquo;anti-life,&rdquo; &ldquo;undemocratic&rdquo; and &ldquo;irresponsible,&rdquo; but &ldquo;legal.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his &ldquo;personal views&rdquo; on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of &lsquo;right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The &lsquo;rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases &ldquo;is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the &lsquo;Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond &ldquo;lingering&rdquo; doubt in cases involving capital punishment. &ldquo;This standard has not yet been evolved,&rdquo; he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the &ldquo;new human rights dynamic&rdquo; and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. &ldquo;Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty &mdash; its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.” Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of ‘right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases “is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the ‘Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond “lingering” doubt in cases involving capital punishment. “This standard has not yet been evolved,” he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the “new human rights dynamic” and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. “Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty — its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11130, 'title' => 'Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of ‘right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases “is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He was addressing a two-day conference on the ‘Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond “lingering” doubt in cases involving capital punishment. “This standard has not yet been evolved,” he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the “new human rights dynamic” and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. “Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty — its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2631334.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11244, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11130, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.” Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of ‘right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases “is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the ‘Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond “lingering” doubt in cases involving capital punishment. “This standard has not yet been evolved,” he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the “new human rights dynamic” and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. “Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty — its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11130, 'title' => 'Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of ‘right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases “is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He was addressing a two-day conference on the ‘Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond “lingering” doubt in cases involving capital punishment. “This standard has not yet been evolved,” he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the “new human rights dynamic” and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. “Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty — its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2631334.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'death-penalty-is-barbaric-says-judge-by-j-venkatesan-11244', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11244, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11130 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.” Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of ‘right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases “is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He was addressing a two-day conference on the ‘Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond “lingering” doubt in cases involving capital punishment. “This standard has not yet been evolved,” he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the “new human rights dynamic” and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. “Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty — its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Death penalty is barbaric, says judge by J Venkatesan |
The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine is a grey area: Justice Ganguly Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly on Tuesday termed death penalty “barbaric,” “anti-life,” “undemocratic” and “irresponsible,” but “legal.” Expressing his “personal views” on the subject, Justice Ganguly said the constitutional guarantee of ‘right to life' could not be subjected to vague premises. The ‘rarest of rare' doctrine in death penalty cases “is a grey area as it depended on the interpretation of individual judges.” He was addressing a two-day conference on the ‘Abolition of Death Penalty in India,' organised by the Jindal Global Law School, near here. Justice Ganguly asserted that sentencing structures should be in consonance with constitutional goals. Referring to the establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, he observed that it should be proved beyond “lingering” doubt in cases involving capital punishment. “This standard has not yet been evolved,” he said. Before inflicting death penalty, a judge must be extremely careful, weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He also asserted that state must adduce evidence that the accused was not beyond reform. In the keynote address, Roger Hood, Professor Emeritus of Criminology and Fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, emphasised that India should move beyond the law established through a Supreme Court judgment 31 years ago in the Bachan Singh case. He stressed need to embrace the “new human rights dynamic” and finally abolish capital punishment completely, even for politically motivated crimes as the vast majority of abolitionist states had done so. “Experience tells us that deterrence is an irrelevant consideration in such cases and executions often perpetuate the anger and resentment that fuelled such crimes in the first instance.” Senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves from the Human Rights Law Network expressed concern over the arbitrary and suspicious nature of application of death penalty — its application in Parliament attack cases such as the Afzal Guru and other cases. In the presidential Address, Chairman of the Law Commission of Karnataka V.S. Malimath differed with Professor Hood and said death penalty was not simply for punishing the wrongdoer, but protecting life and liberty of common citizens. Referring to the growing number of murders, heinous crimes against women, children and terror crimes, he advocated retention of death penalty as a deterrent. He, however, added that a Bench of five judges should decide such cases in order to minimise error in judgment. Even if one judge among them did not agree to death penalty, there should be life imprisonment. Vice-Chancellor of OPJ Global University C. Raj Kumar felt that the abolition of death penalty was critical for India as research around the world had demonstrated that it not only violated human rights, but its penological objectives were not based on any empirical analysis. |