Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 July, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Derecognize-parties-for-blockade-SC-asks-Centre/articleshow/15023650.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16303,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 July, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Derecognize-parties-for-blockade-SC-asks-Centre/articleshow/15023650.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16303,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16175
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.<br /><br />A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre's suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.<br /><br />Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.<br /><br />If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&quot; the Centre suggested.<br /><br />The court had sought the Centre's suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.<br /><br />If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&quot; Nariman said.<br /><br />But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court's 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.<br /><br />The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?<br /><br />Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.<br /><br />The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.<br /><br />The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 July, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Derecognize-parties-for-blockade-SC-asks-Centre/articleshow/15023650.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16303,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 July, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Derecognize-parties-for-blockade-SC-asks-Centre/articleshow/15023650.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16303,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16175
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.<br /><br />A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre's suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.<br /><br />Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.<br /><br />If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&quot; the Centre suggested.<br /><br />The court had sought the Centre's suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.<br /><br />If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&quot; Nariman said.<br /><br />But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court's 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.<br /><br />The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?<br /><br />Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.<br /><br />The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.<br /><br />The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804ebf6ed80b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 July, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Derecognize-parties-for-blockade-SC-asks-Centre/articleshow/15023650.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16303,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16175,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 July, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Derecognize-parties-for-blockade-SC-asks-Centre/articleshow/15023650.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16303,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16175
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre&#039;s suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &amp;quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&amp;quot; the Centre suggested.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had sought the Centre&#039;s suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &amp;quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&amp;quot; Nariman said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court&#039;s 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.<br /><br />A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre's suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.<br /><br />Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.<br /><br />If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&quot; the Centre suggested.<br /><br />The court had sought the Centre's suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.<br /><br />If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&quot; Nariman said.<br /><br />But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court's 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.<br /><br />The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?<br /><br />Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.<br /><br />The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.<br /><br />The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 16175,
		'title' => 'Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre's suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.<br />
<br />
Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.<br />
<br />
If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&quot; the Centre suggested.<br />
<br />
The court had sought the Centre's suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.<br />
<br />
If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&quot; Nariman said.<br />
<br />
But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court's 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.<br />
<br />
The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?<br />
<br />
Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.<br />
<br />
The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.<br />
<br />
The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.<br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 July, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Derecognize-parties-for-blockade-SC-asks-Centre/articleshow/15023650.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 16303,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 16175,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.<br /><br />A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre's suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.<br /><br />Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.<br /><br />If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&quot; the Centre suggested.<br /><br />The court had sought the Centre's suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.<br /><br />If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&quot; Nariman said.<br /><br />But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court's 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.<br /><br />The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?<br /><br />Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.<br /><br />The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.<br /><br />The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.<br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 16175,
	'title' => 'Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre's suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.<br />
<br />
Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.<br />
<br />
If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&quot; the Centre suggested.<br />
<br />
The court had sought the Centre's suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.<br />
<br />
If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&quot; Nariman said.<br />
<br />
But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court's 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.<br />
<br />
The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?<br />
<br />
Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.<br />
<br />
The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.<br />
<br />
The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.<br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 July, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Derecognize-parties-for-blockade-SC-asks-Centre/articleshow/15023650.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'derecognize-parties-for-blockade-sc-asks-centre-dhananjay-mahapatra-16303',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 16303,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 16175
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains.<br /><br />A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre's suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors.<br /><br />Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises.<br /><br />If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. &quot;The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate,&quot; the Centre suggested.<br /><br />The court had sought the Centre's suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade.<br /><br />If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre &quot;to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade,&quot; Nariman said.<br /><br />But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court's 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result.<br /><br />The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors?<br /><br />Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur.<br /><br />The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears.<br /><br />The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.<br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Derecognize parties for blockade? SC asks Centre-Dhananjay Mahapatra

-The Times of India The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre whether political parties should be de-recognized calling for blockade of rail and road as part of their agitation which severely disrupted lives of ordinary citizens and movement of essential items, including foodgrains. A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya posed this question to solicitor general R F Nariman as soon as he presented the Centre's suggestions to counter the prolonged blockade of rail and road by protestors. Among the radical suggestions to counter situations like blockade of highways linking Manipur to the rest of the country by Naga groups for nearly four months last year, the Centre agreed to entrust the judiciary the task of scrutinizing the administrative action to tackle such crises. If a blockade continued beyond a week, then the principal secretary home or the director general of police would send a report to the HC concerned. "The High Court will examine the efforts made at different levels, fix responsibility for failure and call upon the delinquent officers to explain their conduct and issue such orders as may be considered appropriate," the Centre suggested. The court had sought the Centre's suggestion in view of the long blockade of rail traffic by protestors in Rajasthan. The Centre said that based on intelligence input, the state police would endeavour and take steps to foil any such blockade. If the blockade continued beyond five days, the state must request the Centre "to direct the Director General of railway Protection Force or Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) or any other paramilitary force available at the command of the Centre to initiate the desired preventive steps to remove the blockade," Nariman said. But, the court was categorical on a more fundamental aspect to counter blockade and damage caused by protestors to public property. It said the apex court's 2009 judgement imposing cost on agitators to compensate damage to private and public property had not yielded the desired result. The bench asked two questions to Nariman. First, whether political parties calling for rail/road blockade should face de-recognition and second, whether the state failing to remove the blockade be asked to pay damages caused to public property by the protestors? Railways had estimated that it had suffered a loss of Rs 33 crore due to the 11-day long rail roko agitation by the Jat community, which was protesting arrest of their clan members for attack on dalits at Mirchipur. The Centre had suggested that the district magistrate would record quantum of damage to public and private property due to violent acts of agitators and initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover the quantified loss as revenue arrears. The DM should also initiate criminal proceedings against protestors indulging in violent acts and suggested that such cases should be decided by courts within six months.