Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680e78629326c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680e78629326c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680e78629326c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 28 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Despite-court-order-Noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages/articleshow/8610306.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7983,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 28 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Despite-court-order-Noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages/articleshow/8610306.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7983,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7884
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. <br /><br />And this fight hasn't been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. <br /><br />But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. <br /><br />Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &quot;contempt of court&quot;. <br /><br />District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&quot; <br /><br />The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. <br /><br />The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. <br /><br />&quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. <br /><br />The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&quot; said Ombir of Harola village. <br /><br />Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680e78629326c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680e78629326c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680e78629326c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 28 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Despite-court-order-Noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages/articleshow/8610306.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7983,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 28 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Despite-court-order-Noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages/articleshow/8610306.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7983,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7884
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. <br /><br />And this fight hasn't been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. <br /><br />But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. <br /><br />Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &quot;contempt of court&quot;. <br /><br />District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&quot; <br /><br />The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. <br /><br />The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. <br /><br />&quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. <br /><br />The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&quot; said Ombir of Harola village. <br /><br />Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680e78629326c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e78629326c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680e78629326c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680e78629326c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 28 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Despite-court-order-Noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages/articleshow/8610306.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7983,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7884,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 28 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Despite-court-order-Noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages/articleshow/8610306.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7983,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7884
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It&#039;s been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And this fight hasn&#039;t been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &amp;quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&amp;quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &amp;quot;contempt of court&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &amp;quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &amp;quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&amp;quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&amp;quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &amp;quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&amp;quot; said Ombir of Harola village. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. <br /><br />And this fight hasn't been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. <br /><br />But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. <br /><br />Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &quot;contempt of court&quot;. <br /><br />District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&quot; <br /><br />The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. <br /><br />The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. <br /><br />&quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. <br /><br />The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&quot; said Ombir of Harola village. <br /><br />Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 7884,
		'title' => 'Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. <br />
<br />
And this fight hasn't been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. <br />
<br />
But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. <br />
<br />
Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &quot;contempt of court&quot;. <br />
<br />
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&quot; <br />
<br />
The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. <br />
<br />
The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. <br />
<br />
&quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. <br />
<br />
The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&quot; said Ombir of Harola village. <br />
<br />
Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Despite-court-order-Noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages/articleshow/8610306.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 7983,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 7884,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice',
	'metaDesc' => '
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. <br /><br />And this fight hasn't been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. <br /><br />But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. <br /><br />Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &quot;contempt of court&quot;. <br /><br />District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&quot; <br /><br />The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. <br /><br />The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. <br /><br />&quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. <br /><br />The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&quot; said Ombir of Harola village. <br /><br />Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 7884,
	'title' => 'Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. <br />
<br />
And this fight hasn't been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. <br />
<br />
But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. <br />
<br />
Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &quot;contempt of court&quot;. <br />
<br />
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&quot; <br />
<br />
The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. <br />
<br />
The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. <br />
<br />
&quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. <br />
<br />
The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&quot; said Ombir of Harola village. <br />
<br />
Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 28 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/Despite-court-order-Noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages/articleshow/8610306.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'despite-court-order-noida-farmers-yet-to-get-reviewed-damages-by-purusharth-aradhak-7983',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 7983,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 7884
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. <br /><br />And this fight hasn't been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. <br /><br />But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. <br /><br />Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. &quot;We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so.&quot; Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to &quot;contempt of court&quot;. <br /><br />District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, &quot;The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible.&quot; <br /><br />The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. <br /><br />The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. &quot;The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap,&quot; fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. <br /><br />&quot;Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action,&quot; said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. <br /><br />The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. &quot;My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house,&quot; said Ombir of Harola village. <br /><br />Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Despite court order, Noida farmers yet to get reviewed damages by Purusharth Aradhak

They may not be in news like their counterparts in Bhatta-Parsaul, but the fight of farmers in Noida against the satellite city Authorityand the UP government is nothing new. It's been on since 1976 when land was acquired for the first time to lay the foundation stone of Noida. And this fight hasn't been completely futile. On July 30, 2010, Allahabad high court directed the Noida Authority to pay reviewed land compensation at the rate of Rs 28.12 per square yard. But the order has not been implemented so far. OnSeptember 28, 2010,Noida Authority secretary Shrish Chand Verma wrote to the additional district magistrate (land acquisition), asking him to submit the calculation sheet of those farmers whose cases have been pending since 1976. A similar letter was sent again on April 21, 2011. TOI has a copy of the second letter. Verma said no compensation could be released without the calculation sheet which has to be filled up by the ADM. "We have written twice to the ADM (LA) to submit the calculation sheet. I have also personally told him to do so." Verma, however, claimed the delay did not amount to "contempt of court". District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal said, "The ADM (LA) works under the jurisdiction of the Noida Authority. I am, on my part, will order the ADM to settle the case as soon as possible." The high court verdict followed a ruling of a district court in Ghaziabad on February 26, 1986, which asked the Authority to pay the Noida farmers at Rs 9.92 per square yard. The affected farmers alleged that the authorities wrapped up the work of private builders within a week while it had been only empty assurances for them for the last 36 years. "The Authority seems less bothered about the farmers who have been cheated since the foundation of Noida. Only empty assurances have been given. We have met almost all senior officials of the Noida Authority. Unfortunately, the Authority does not listen to the farmers without any agitation or mishap," fumed Virender of Raghunath Pura, whose land was acquired in 1976 and it became part of the Noida stadium. "Most villagers are still living on their landand the Authority has registered encroachment cases against them. Few years ago, slums developed in sectors 6, 8, 9 and other areas. The Authority has planned to launch a scheme to offer them flats and the farmers who are still living on their land are facing legal action," said Kiranpal Sharma, another farmer. The Authority has not even fulfilled its own commitments to the Noida villagers. "My land was acquired in 1976. At that time, the Authority promised to offer a plot under the rehabilitation scheme. I am still fighting for it. In 2006, the Noida Authority launched a scheme and I applied. A draw was conducted and in 2009 I paid Rs 7 lakh for a plot of 162 square metres. But the Authority cancelled the allotment in 2011 saying I have encroached upon its land as I am still living in my old house," said Ombir of Harola village. Bhim Chand of Atta village has a similar tale to tell. His land was acquired and he had deposited Rs 10.68 lakh after a plot of 250 square metres was allotted to him, but it was cancelled on the similar ground. In both cases, the Authority did not bother to carry out any check before allotting the plots.