Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26572, 'title' => 'Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Business Standard </div> <p align="justify"> <em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. </p> <p align="justify"> All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. </p> <p align="justify"> Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. </p> <p align="justify"> Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). </p> <p align="justify"> The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 20 November, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/despite-trade-union-s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-114111901238_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674610, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26572, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'metaKeywords' => 'Industrial Disputes Act,Contract Labour Act,Factories Act,labour laws,Labour Laws Flexibility,Labour Laws Reforms,Labour Reforms,Labour Rights,Trade Unions', 'metaDesc' => ' -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26572, 'title' => 'Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Business Standard </div> <p align="justify"> <em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. </p> <p align="justify"> All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. </p> <p align="justify"> Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. </p> <p align="justify"> Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). </p> <p align="justify"> The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 20 November, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/despite-trade-union-s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-114111901238_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674610, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26572 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments' $metaKeywords = 'Industrial Disputes Act,Contract Labour Act,Factories Act,labour laws,Labour Laws Flexibility,Labour Laws Reforms,Labour Reforms,Labour Rights,Trade Unions' $metaDesc = ' -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">"The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue," said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. "The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase," said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as "anti labour". They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: "We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions."</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation," said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26572, 'title' => 'Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Business Standard </div> <p align="justify"> <em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. </p> <p align="justify"> All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. </p> <p align="justify"> Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. </p> <p align="justify"> Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). </p> <p align="justify"> The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 20 November, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/despite-trade-union-s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-114111901238_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674610, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26572, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'metaKeywords' => 'Industrial Disputes Act,Contract Labour Act,Factories Act,labour laws,Labour Laws Flexibility,Labour Laws Reforms,Labour Reforms,Labour Rights,Trade Unions', 'metaDesc' => ' -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26572, 'title' => 'Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Business Standard </div> <p align="justify"> <em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. </p> <p align="justify"> All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. </p> <p align="justify"> Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. </p> <p align="justify"> Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). </p> <p align="justify"> The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 20 November, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/despite-trade-union-s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-114111901238_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674610, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26572 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments' $metaKeywords = 'Industrial Disputes Act,Contract Labour Act,Factories Act,labour laws,Labour Laws Flexibility,Labour Laws Reforms,Labour Reforms,Labour Rights,Trade Unions' $metaDesc = ' -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">"The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue," said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. "The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase," said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as "anti labour". They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: "We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions."</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation," said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67faece0eb2b6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26572, 'title' => 'Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Business Standard </div> <p align="justify"> <em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. </p> <p align="justify"> All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. </p> <p align="justify"> Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. </p> <p align="justify"> Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). </p> <p align="justify"> The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 20 November, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/despite-trade-union-s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-114111901238_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674610, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26572, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'metaKeywords' => 'Industrial Disputes Act,Contract Labour Act,Factories Act,labour laws,Labour Laws Flexibility,Labour Laws Reforms,Labour Reforms,Labour Rights,Trade Unions', 'metaDesc' => ' -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26572, 'title' => 'Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Business Standard </div> <p align="justify"> <em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. </p> <p align="justify"> All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. </p> <p align="justify"> Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. </p> <p align="justify"> Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). </p> <p align="justify"> The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 20 November, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/despite-trade-union-s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-114111901238_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674610, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26572 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union&#039;s opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments' $metaKeywords = 'Industrial Disputes Act,Contract Labour Act,Factories Act,labour laws,Labour Laws Flexibility,Labour Laws Reforms,Labour Reforms,Labour Rights,Trade Unions' $metaDesc = ' -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue,&quot; said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. &quot;The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase,&quot; said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as &quot;anti labour&quot;. They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: &quot;We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation,&quot; said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">"The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue," said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. "The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase," said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as "anti labour". They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: "We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions."</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation," said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26572, 'title' => 'Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Business Standard </div> <p align="justify"> <em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. </p> <p align="justify"> "The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue," said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. "The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase," said Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. </p> <p align="justify"> All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as "anti labour". They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. </p> <p align="justify"> Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: "We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions." </p> <p align="justify"> Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation," said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. </p> <p align="justify"> Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). </p> <p align="justify"> The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 20 November, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/despite-trade-union-s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-114111901238_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674610, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26572, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'metaKeywords' => 'Industrial Disputes Act,Contract Labour Act,Factories Act,labour laws,Labour Laws Flexibility,Labour Laws Reforms,Labour Reforms,Labour Rights,Trade Unions', 'metaDesc' => ' -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">"The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue," said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. "The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase," said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as "anti labour". They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: "We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions."</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation," said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26572, 'title' => 'Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Business Standard </div> <p align="justify"> <em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. </p> <p align="justify"> "The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue," said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. "The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase," said Dattatreya. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. </p> <p align="justify"> The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. </p> <p align="justify"> All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as "anti labour". They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. </p> <p align="justify"> Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: "We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions." </p> <p align="justify"> Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation," said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. </p> <p align="justify"> Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. </p> <p align="justify"> The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). </p> <p align="justify"> The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 20 November, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/despite-trade-union-s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-114111901238_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'despite-trade-union039s-opposition-centre-to-go-ahead-with-labour-law-amendments-4674610', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674610, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26572 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments' $metaKeywords = 'Industrial Disputes Act,Contract Labour Act,Factories Act,labour laws,Labour Laws Flexibility,Labour Laws Reforms,Labour Reforms,Labour Rights,Trade Unions' $metaDesc = ' -Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday)...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Business Standard</div><p align="justify"><em>Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session</em></p><p align="justify">The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions.</p><p align="justify">"The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue," said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. "The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase," said Dattatreya.</p><p align="justify">The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5.</p><p align="justify">The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed.</p><p align="justify">All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as "anti labour". They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage.</p><p align="justify">Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: "We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions."</p><p align="justify">Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation," said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions.</p><p align="justify">Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers.</p><p align="justify">The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre).</p><p align="justify">The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Despite trade union's opposition, Centre to go ahead with labour law amendments |
-Business Standard Minister meets union leaders who warn him of confrontation ahead; Dattatreya says amendments to be taken up in coming Parliament session The Union government is going ahead with the pending labour law amendments in the coming session (from next Tuesday) of Parliament, despite strong opposition from trade unions. "The amendments are long-pending issues which the previous government couldn't sort out.... We have already passed the Apprentices Act in the Lok Sabha.... The amendments that have been moved earlier will continue," said Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya. He'd also invited representatives of central trade unions to meet him on Wednesday, the first one since his recent assumption of the office. "The trade unions expressed some reservations about (the) labour law changes. I told them that the dialogue will continue and the gap between trade unions and our ministry will not increase," said Dattatreya. The TUs, including the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, which is aligned with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, gave him a joint memorandum. They said they'd proceed with their planned nationwide protest on December 5. The Union government had introduced amendments to the Factories Act, Apprentices Act and Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining registers by certain establishments) Act during the previous parliamentary session. The Apprentices Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and is yet to be cleared in the Rajya Sabha. The Factories Act was introduced in the Lok Sabha and the Labour Laws Act in the Rajya Sabha; these are yet to be passed. All the proposed amendments had been strongly criticised by the TUs as "anti labour". They noted they'd not been consulted at any stage. Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions, said: "We said there will be conflict in the manner in which you are going ahead with the labour law changes. If the government supports harmonious relations, it should reverse these decisions." Otherwise, there will be discontent and agitation," said Tapan Sen, general secretary of the pro-CPI(M) Centre of Indian Trade Unions. Sen said Dattatreya assured the unions of more frequent meetings with him and of protecting the interest of workers. The TUs had also opposed the labour law changes made by the Rajasthan government and the similar ones proposed by the Madhya Pradesh government (both these are run by the Bharatiya Janata Party, now also in charge at the Centre). The unions said in their memorandum that the previous Union minister, Narendra Singh Tomar, had given them a favourable assurance on the Rajasthan laws but this wasn't implemented. President Pranab Mukherjee had, on the central government's recommendation, recently given his assent to the Rajasthan government's amendments to the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. |