Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4666, 'title' => 'Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article940515.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4757, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4666, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'metaKeywords' => 'climate change', 'metaDesc' => 'EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue....', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4666, 'title' => 'Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article940515.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4757, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4666 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon' $metaKeywords = 'climate change' $metaDesc = 'EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue....' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue...."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with “an equally robust” outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,” she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.” The status quo will not do,” he said. “Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and “parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4666, 'title' => 'Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article940515.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4757, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4666, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'metaKeywords' => 'climate change', 'metaDesc' => 'EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue....', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4666, 'title' => 'Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article940515.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4757, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4666 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon' $metaKeywords = 'climate change' $metaDesc = 'EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue....' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue...."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with “an equally robust” outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,” she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.” The status quo will not do,” he said. “Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and “parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68101a9db9b28-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4666, 'title' => 'Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article940515.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4757, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4666, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'metaKeywords' => 'climate change', 'metaDesc' => 'EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue....', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4666, 'title' => 'Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article940515.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4757, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4666 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon' $metaKeywords = 'climate change' $metaDesc = 'EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue....' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with &ldquo;an equally robust&rdquo; outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,&rdquo; she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.&rdquo; The status quo will not do,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and &ldquo;parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue...."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with “an equally robust” outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,” she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.” The status quo will not do,” he said. “Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and “parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4666, 'title' => 'Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with “an equally robust” outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,” she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.” The status quo will not do,” he said. “Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and “parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article940515.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4757, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4666, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'metaKeywords' => 'climate change', 'metaDesc' => 'EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue....', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with “an equally robust” outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,” she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.” The status quo will not do,” he said. “Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and “parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4666, 'title' => 'Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with “an equally robust” outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,” she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.” The status quo will not do,” he said. “Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and “parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article940515.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'differences-over-second-phase-of-commitment-to-kyoto-protocol-by-meena-menon-4757', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4757, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4666 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon' $metaKeywords = 'climate change' $metaDesc = 'EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-buildingAs the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue....' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with “an equally robust” outcome under the Convention track.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Adaptation fund mooted</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,” she added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.” The status quo will not do,” he said. “Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and “parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Differences over second phase of commitment to Kyoto Protocol by Meena Menon |
EU wants balancing package with adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building As the high-level segment of the U.N. climate change conference began here on Tuesday, the second period of commitment to the Kyoto Protocol (KP) has become a contentious issue. After Japan's statement on the opening day of the conference last week that it was not in favour of committing itself to a second phase, things had taken a downturn. The first period of commitment to the KP expires in December 2012 and there is a feeling that deciding on the second phase of commitment can wait until then, according to some countries. Last year in Copenhagen, several countries already made commitments and these can be taken forward till 2012, some felt. The European Union (EU) said it was willing to consider a second commitment period under the KP as part of a wider outcome, including the perspective of a global and comprehensive framework engaging all major economies. It called for strengthening the Protocol and backing it up with “an equally robust” outcome under the Convention track. The EU and its 27 member States wanted a balancing package with essential elements such as adaptation, technology, finance, REDD plus and capacity-building, it added. However, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and some African countries are insisting on a binding agreement and the situation has become rather fluid at the conference. Tillman J. Thomas, Prime Minister of Granada and chairperson of AOSIS, a group of 43 members, was categorical about delaying a second commitment period. “A decision to have the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to begin on January 1, 2013, is one of the essential ingredients of any Cancun outcome that we are prepared to accept.” The United Nations Environment Programme GAP Report, which was released on Wednesday, clearly stated that the current emission pledges were far from adequate to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees as advocated by more than 106 countries, he said. The 14 Pacific Island Developing States threatened with extinction if sea levels rise, said there was little room for compromise and called for a fair solution. Cancun should take the world one step closer to a two-track legally-binding outcome in Durban next year, they said. The Group of 77 and China too felt the time had come to secure an outcome that fulfilled the mandate stipulated in Bali. It also called for establishing a second commitment period under the KP, ensuring emission reduction by developed countries and to avoid the gap between the first commitment period and the second commitment period. Adaptation fund mooted The 49-member group of the Least Developed Countries called for an adaptation fund, finances, but mainly stressed avoiding a gap between the first and second periods of commitment. Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) Christiana Figueres in her speech said the stakes were high because time was running out. Cancun must deliver, she stressed. “The deal here in Cancun will not guarantee all your short-term national interest, but reaching no outcome here in Cancun will endanger everyone's long-term well-being,” she added. U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki moon in his address said that business as usual would not be tolerated and Cancun must represent a breakthrough.” The status quo will not do,” he said. “Tangible progress is possible here in Cancun. We do not need an agreement on all issues but we do need progress on all fronts,” he said. He underscored the need to take decisions on forests, on adaptation, on technology and on the creation of a new fund for long-term climate financing. He called for increased clarity on the KP and “parties need to agree how and when to move forward after Cancun on issues still under discussion.” |