Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21870,
'title' => 'Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 20 July, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states/1144205/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 22018,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 21870,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'metaKeywords' => 'Disaster Management,disaster,floods,uttarakhand',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21870,
'title' => 'Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 20 July, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states/1144205/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 22018,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 21870
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states'
$metaKeywords = 'Disaster Management,disaster,floods,uttarakhand'
$metaDesc = '
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">"Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit," the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21870,
'title' => 'Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 20 July, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states/1144205/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 22018,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 21870,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'metaKeywords' => 'Disaster Management,disaster,floods,uttarakhand',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21870,
'title' => 'Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 20 July, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states/1144205/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 22018,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 21870
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states'
$metaKeywords = 'Disaster Management,disaster,floods,uttarakhand'
$metaDesc = '
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">"Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit," the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68055abbc4a0a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21870,
'title' => 'Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 20 July, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states/1144205/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 22018,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 21870,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'metaKeywords' => 'Disaster Management,disaster,floods,uttarakhand',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21870,
'title' => 'Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 20 July, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states/1144205/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 22018,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 21870
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states'
$metaKeywords = 'Disaster Management,disaster,floods,uttarakhand'
$metaDesc = '
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit,&quot; the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">"Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit," the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21870,
'title' => 'Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
"Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit," the petition stated.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 20 July, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states/1144205/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 22018,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 21870,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'metaKeywords' => 'Disaster Management,disaster,floods,uttarakhand',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">"Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit," the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21870,
'title' => 'Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
"Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit," the petition stated.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 20 July, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states/1144205/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 22018,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 21870
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states'
$metaKeywords = 'Disaster Management,disaster,floods,uttarakhand'
$metaDesc = '
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.</p><p align="justify">A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.</p><p align="justify">The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.</p><p align="justify">"Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit," the petition stated.</p><p align="justify">It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/disaster-law-supreme-court-seeks-reply-from-7-states-22018.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states | Im4change.org
Disaster law: Supreme Court seeks reply from 7 states
-The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Friday sought reply from Uttarakhand and six other states for their alleged failure to implement the Disaster Management Act.
A Bench led by Justice A K Patnaik sought responses from the Centre and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands on a PIL alleging the governments had failed to implement the 2005 disaster law in true spirit.
The six other states asked to respond are Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Gujarat. Referring to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand, the petitioner, advocate Gaurav Bansal, alleged the casualties would have been less had the state government implemented the provisions of the Act.
"Nation witnessed the catastrophe that struck Uttarakhand and which resulted in numerous deaths and tragedies. It is respectfully submitted that in order to fight such catastrophe, Parliament, in year 2005, enacted the Disaster Management Act. However, it sounds pathetic that even after eight years of the Act, the Centre and the various state governments have failed to implement its provisions in true letter and spirit," the petition stated.
It said not only Uttarakhand, but Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also failed to implement the provisions of the Act. The PIL also said there is no uniform policy in the country in case of granting ex-gratia compensation to the victims of disaster.
