Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2756, 'title' => 'District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> &nbsp; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 August, 2010, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/district-admin-refutes-claimssaxena-panelposco-project/404154/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2842, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Mining,Displacement', 'metaDesc' => ' The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2756, 'title' => 'District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> &nbsp; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 August, 2010, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/district-admin-refutes-claimssaxena-panelposco-project/404154/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2842, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Mining,Displacement' $metaDesc = ' The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration’s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government’s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee’s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on “factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify"> </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2756, 'title' => 'District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> &nbsp; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 August, 2010, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/district-admin-refutes-claimssaxena-panelposco-project/404154/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2842, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Mining,Displacement', 'metaDesc' => ' The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2756, 'title' => 'District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> &nbsp; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 August, 2010, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/district-admin-refutes-claimssaxena-panelposco-project/404154/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2842, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Mining,Displacement' $metaDesc = ' The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration’s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government’s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee’s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on “factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify"> </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810348ea6e62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2756, 'title' => 'District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> &nbsp; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 August, 2010, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/district-admin-refutes-claimssaxena-panelposco-project/404154/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2842, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Mining,Displacement', 'metaDesc' => ' The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2756, 'title' => 'District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> &nbsp; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 August, 2010, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/district-admin-refutes-claimssaxena-panelposco-project/404154/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2842, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Mining,Displacement' $metaDesc = ' The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration&rsquo;s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government&rsquo;s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee&rsquo;s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on &ldquo;factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration’s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government’s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee’s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on “factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify"> </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2756, 'title' => 'District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The district administration’s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government’s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the committee’s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on “factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 August, 2010, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/district-admin-refutes-claimssaxena-panelposco-project/404154/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2842, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Mining,Displacement', 'metaDesc' => ' The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration’s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government’s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee’s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on “factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify"> </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2756, 'title' => 'District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /> </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The district administration’s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government’s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Following the committee’s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on “factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 August, 2010, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/district-admin-refutes-claimssaxena-panelposco-project/404154/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'district-admin-refutes-claims-of-saxena-panel-on-posco-project-2842', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2842, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Mining,Displacement' $metaDesc = ' The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land.<br /></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The district administration’s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government’s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Following the committee’s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on “factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.</font></p><p align="justify"> </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
District admin refutes claims of Saxena panel on Posco project |
The Jagatsinghpur district administration has refuted the claims of National Forest Rights Act (NFRA) committee on presence of Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) at the Posco project site and also on seeking the consent of gram sabha for diversion of forest land for the project. Contrary to the observations of the committee, the district collector said, there is no proof of any villager cultivating the forest land for the last three generations or for last 75 years making them eligible to be counted as OTFDs. Similarly, he said, the administration, as required under law, had conducted gram sabhas in which the villagers had given their consent for diversion of forest land. The collector said this in response to the letter from the state forest department asking him to file factual report about the violation of Forest Rights Act at the Posco site, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land to the company and other affairs related to forest land issue. He further pointed out that no villager has submitted application within last three decades to claim his right on the forest land in the area. The district administration’s response was an encore of its similar replies to the queries of Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) earlier this year. However, the National Forest Rights Act committee set up jointly by MoEF and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which visited the Posco site two weeks back as part of its mandate to look into allegations of FRA violation, had contested the views of the district administration. Referring to oral evidence and some documents collected from the villagers and elsewhere during their tour, the committee, in its report, concluded that OTFDs existed in the Posco site area and certain gram sabhas had not given their consent for diversion of forest land, thus making the state government’s attempt to acquire land for the project a fit case of FRA violation. Following the committee’s observation, MoEF had written to the state government to stop all work on the project, including land acquisition and reply it through return fax on “factual position on FRA violation, position of handing over of the forest and non-forest land and other affairs related to the forest land issue. The state government had forwarded MoEF's letter to the district administration for response. The government wanted to verify the allegations of irregularities in land acquisition and violation of FRA in detail, before starting negotiations with MoEF to clear the air and expedite land acquisition for the Posco project. In its report, the district administration maintained that the Dhinkia panchayat, which will be affected by Posco project, had not come under forest area for the past three decades. In 1955, all forests of the undivided Cuttack district were handed over to the Divisional Forest Officer, Athgarh but Dhinkia was not included under forest area and hence no family can be categorized as traditional forest dweller. When contacted, the Kujang tahsildar, Basudev Pradhan informed that before putting a halt to the land acquisition process, the administration had surveyed 161 betel vines in Gadkujang panchayat and demolished 96 betel vines after paying compensation of Rs 1.36 crore.
|