Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de56628f02-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de56628f02-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de56628f02-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 29 May, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/regulation/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query/articleshow/20327230.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21317,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti,transparency&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 29 May, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/regulation/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query/articleshow/20327230.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21317,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21172
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti,transparency&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query! | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>MUMBAI: </em>A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.</p><p align="justify">The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.</p><p align="justify">Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.</p><p align="justify">Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.</p><p align="justify">In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi's Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.</p><p align="justify">Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi's response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.</p><p align="justify">Besides, there was no reason to &quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de56628f02-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de56628f02-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de56628f02-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 29 May, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/regulation/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query/articleshow/20327230.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21317,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti,transparency&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 29 May, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/regulation/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query/articleshow/20327230.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21317,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21172
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti,transparency&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query! | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>MUMBAI: </em>A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.</p><p align="justify">The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.</p><p align="justify">Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.</p><p align="justify">Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.</p><p align="justify">In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi's Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.</p><p align="justify">Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi's response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.</p><p align="justify">Besides, there was no reason to &quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de56628f02-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de56628f02-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de56628f02-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de56628f02-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 29 May, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/regulation/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query/articleshow/20327230.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21317,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti,transparency&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21172,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 29 May, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/regulation/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query/articleshow/20327230.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21317,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21172
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti,transparency&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;MUMBAI: &lt;/em&gt;A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through &#039;various illegalities&#039; seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &amp;quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &amp;quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi&#039;s Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &amp;quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi&#039;s response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Besides, there was no reason to &amp;quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&amp;quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&amp;quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query! | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>MUMBAI: </em>A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.</p><p align="justify">The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.</p><p align="justify">Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.</p><p align="justify">Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.</p><p align="justify">In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi's Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.</p><p align="justify">Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi's response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.</p><p align="justify">Besides, there was no reason to &quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 21172,
		'title' => 'Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-PTI
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>MUMBAI: </em>A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&quot;.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&quot;.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi's Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&quot;.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi's response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Besides, there was no reason to &quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. 
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 29 May, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/regulation/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query/articleshow/20327230.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 21317,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 21172,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti,transparency',
	'metaDesc' => '
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>MUMBAI: </em>A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.</p><p align="justify">The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.</p><p align="justify">Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.</p><p align="justify">Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.</p><p align="justify">In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi's Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.</p><p align="justify">Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi's response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.</p><p align="justify">Besides, there was no reason to &quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. </p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 21172,
	'title' => 'Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-PTI
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>MUMBAI: </em>A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&quot;.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&quot;.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi's Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&quot;.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi's response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Besides, there was no reason to &quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. 
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 29 May, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/regulation/does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query/articleshow/20327230.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'does-sahara-group-come-under-rti-act-sebi-gets-a-query-21317',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 21317,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 21172
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti,transparency'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI



MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-PTI</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>MUMBAI: </em>A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also.</p><p align="justify">The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures.</p><p align="justify">Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process.</p><p align="justify">Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi.</p><p align="justify">In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought &quot;information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that &quot;Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi's Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information.</p><p align="justify">Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that &quot;the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi's response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone.</p><p align="justify">Besides, there was no reason to &quot;disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)&quot; that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act.</p><p align="justify">&quot;In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi,&quot; the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Does Sahara group come under RTI Act? Sebi gets a query!

-PTI MUMBAI: A long-drawn case involving funds raised by two Sahara firms through 'various illegalities' seems to have made Sebi a preferred agency for all kinds of queries about the group, with the latest being whether the Lucknow-based conglomerate falls under the purview of RTI Act. After Sebi rejected the information sought from it through an RTI (Right To Information) application in this regard, the appellant approached the Appellate Authority but the appeal has been rejected there also. The market regulator is involved in a long-drawn battle with Sahara group over refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore raised by its two firms from the public investors without getting required approvals and following statutory procedures. Sebi is currently in the process of refunding the money to genuine investors after verifying their credentials. As per a Supreme Court order in this matter, the refunds are being made from an amount of Rs 5,120 crore deposited by Saharas with Sebi towards the repayment process. Sahara claims that it has already refunded more than Rs 20,000 crore directly to the bondholders of its two firms and the total outstanding liability towards refund is less than Rs 5,120 crore deposited with Sebi. In the meantime, Sebi received an RTI application from an individual on March 14 wherein he sought "information regarding whether or not Sahara India Pariwar fell within the purview of the RTI Act alongwith the reasons thereof". Through a letter dated April 5, the market regulator responded to the RTI query wherein it informed the appellant that "Sebi did not have any information in respect of the query raised vide his application". Consequently, the appellant filed an appeal earlier this month before Sebi's Appellate Authority and reiterated his request for the same information. Hearing the appeal, the Appellate Authority observed in an order passed yesterday that "the appellant, in this appeal, has neither brought up any specific deficiency in the response of the respondent nor has he raised any specific grounds of appeal for my consideration". Rejecting the appeal, the Appellate Authority said in its order that the appellant did not make any ground for interference in Sebi's response to the RTI query and the appeal was liable to be rejected for this reason alone. Besides, there was no reason to "disbelieve the response provided by the respondent (Sebi)" that the market regulator did not have any information on whether Sahara group fell within the purview of RTI Act. "In view of these observations, I find that the respondent cannot be obliged to provide the information sought by the appellant, in his application, as such information was not available with Sebi," the Appellate Authority said in its order and dismissed the appeal.