Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17787, 'title' => 'Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 2 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/don-t-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties/1025429/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17916, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17787, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17787, 'title' => 'Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 2 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/don-t-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties/1025429/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17916, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17787 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People’s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not “public authorities”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,” argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,” countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP’s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as “public authorities” as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes “owned, controlled or substantially financed” bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17787, 'title' => 'Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 2 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/don-t-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties/1025429/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17916, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17787, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17787, 'title' => 'Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 2 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/don-t-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties/1025429/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17916, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17787 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People’s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not “public authorities”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,” argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,” countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP’s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as “public authorities” as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes “owned, controlled or substantially financed” bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509ad129fb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680509ad129fb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17787, 'title' => 'Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 2 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/don-t-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties/1025429/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17916, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17787, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17787, 'title' => 'Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 2 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/don-t-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties/1025429/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17916, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17787 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People&rsquo;s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,&rdquo; argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,&rdquo; countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP&rsquo;s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as &ldquo;public authorities&rdquo; as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes &ldquo;owned, controlled or substantially financed&rdquo; bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People’s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not “public authorities”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,” argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,” countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP’s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as “public authorities” as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes “owned, controlled or substantially financed” bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17787, 'title' => 'Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People’s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not “public authorities”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,” argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,” countered Sharma. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> BJP’s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as “public authorities” as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes “owned, controlled or substantially financed” bodies. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 2 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/don-t-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties/1025429/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17916, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17787, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People’s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not “public authorities”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,” argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,” countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP’s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as “public authorities” as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes “owned, controlled or substantially financed” bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17787, 'title' => 'Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People’s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not “public authorities”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,” argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,” countered Sharma. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> BJP’s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as “public authorities” as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes “owned, controlled or substantially financed” bodies. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 2 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/don-t-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties/1025429/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-include-us-under-rti-act-say-parties-shyamlal-yadav-17916', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17916, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17787 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Indian Express</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People’s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not “public authorities”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,” argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,” countered Sharma.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">BJP’s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as “public authorities” as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes “owned, controlled or substantially financed” bodies.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Don’t include us under RTI Act, say parties-Shyamlal Yadav |
-The Indian Express Cutting across party lines, the BJP, NCP, CPI(M), CPI and BSP have told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that they should not be covered under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Congress, however, has not made its views known as it skipped the hearing before the full bench on Thursday. The representatives of the political parties argued that since they already provide details to the Election Commission and the Income Tax department under the Representation of People’s Act, there is no need to include them under RTI. The full bench, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyanand Mishra and Commissioners M L Sharma and Annapurna Dikshit, reserved their order on Thursday. The appeals before the CIC were filed by RTI activist Subhash Aggarwal and Anil Bairwal of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), whose queries were reportedly returned by political parties which claimed that they did not come under the ambit of the RTI Act as they are not “public authorities”. “There are many things discussed at different levels of the party. Divulging certain details under the RTI Act may distort the entire process of internal democracy of the party,” argued Ramchandran Pillai, appearing for the CPI(M). He added that donors who contribute over Rs 20,000 are already disclosed to the EC and I-T department. Amit Anand Tewari, appearing for the NCP, argued that the parties would have to divert a lot of resources to create a system of public information officers and first appellate authorities if they are covered under the RTI Act. “This is not a valid point since it is true for every public authority,” countered Sharma. BJP’s Subhasish Shourya said since the Act does not deal with the matter of political parties, it is clear that the intention of the Act was not to include them. This issue before the commission is whether the political parties can be incuded as “public authorities” as defined under 2(h)(d)(I), which includes “owned, controlled or substantially financed” bodies. The appellants claimed that since the parties are allotted government land at subsidised rates and are allotted free time on All India Radio and Doordarshan among other things, they must be covered under the transparency law.
|