Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7063, 'title' => 'Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<em><br /> </em> <div align="justify"> <em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /> </em><br /> The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /> <br /> A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /> <br /> In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Probe transfer<br /> </em><br /> The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /> <br /> The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /> <br /> The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /> <br /> On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /> <br /> &quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 13 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/13/stories/2011041363180700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7160, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7063, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,Lokayukta', 'metaDesc' => ' &ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo; The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to...', 'disp' => '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />&quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7063, 'title' => 'Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<em><br /> </em> <div align="justify"> <em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /> </em><br /> The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /> <br /> A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /> <br /> In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Probe transfer<br /> </em><br /> The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /> <br /> The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /> <br /> The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /> <br /> On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /> <br /> &quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 13 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/13/stories/2011041363180700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7160, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7063 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,Lokayukta' $metaDesc = ' &ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo; The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to...' $disp = '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />&quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" “How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?” The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>“How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?”<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said “No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.”<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: “Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />"The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.”<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. “We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.”<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: “We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7063, 'title' => 'Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<em><br /> </em> <div align="justify"> <em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /> </em><br /> The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /> <br /> A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /> <br /> In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Probe transfer<br /> </em><br /> The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /> <br /> The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /> <br /> The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /> <br /> On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /> <br /> &quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 13 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/13/stories/2011041363180700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7160, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7063, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,Lokayukta', 'metaDesc' => ' &ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo; The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to...', 'disp' => '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />&quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7063, 'title' => 'Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<em><br /> </em> <div align="justify"> <em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /> </em><br /> The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /> <br /> A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /> <br /> In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Probe transfer<br /> </em><br /> The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /> <br /> The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /> <br /> The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /> <br /> On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /> <br /> &quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 13 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/13/stories/2011041363180700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7160, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7063 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,Lokayukta' $metaDesc = ' &ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo; The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to...' $disp = '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />&quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" “How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?” The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>“How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?”<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said “No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.”<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: “Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />"The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.”<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. “We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.”<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: “We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de86cee01c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de86cee01c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7063, 'title' => 'Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<em><br /> </em> <div align="justify"> <em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /> </em><br /> The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /> <br /> A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /> <br /> In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Probe transfer<br /> </em><br /> The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /> <br /> The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /> <br /> The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /> <br /> On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /> <br /> &quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 13 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/13/stories/2011041363180700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7160, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7063, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,Lokayukta', 'metaDesc' => ' &ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo; The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to...', 'disp' => '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />&quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7063, 'title' => 'Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<em><br /> </em> <div align="justify"> <em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /> </em><br /> The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /> <br /> A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /> <br /> In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Probe transfer<br /> </em><br /> The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /> <br /> The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /> <br /> The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /> <br /> On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /> <br /> &quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 13 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/13/stories/2011041363180700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7160, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7063 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,Lokayukta' $metaDesc = ' &ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo; The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to...' $disp = '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said &ldquo;No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: &ldquo;Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />&quot;The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.&rdquo;<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. &ldquo;We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.&rdquo;<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: &ldquo;We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" “How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?” The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>“How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?”<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said “No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.”<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: “Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />"The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.”<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. “We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.”<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: “We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7063, 'title' => 'Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<em><br /> </em> <div align="justify"> <em>“How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?”<br /> </em><br /> The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /> <br /> A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /> <br /> In its order, the Bench said “No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.”<br /> <br /> <em>Probe transfer<br /> </em><br /> The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /> <br /> The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /> <br /> The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /> <br /> On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: “Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /> <br /> "The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.”<br /> <br /> State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. “We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.”<br /> <br /> Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: “We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.” </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 13 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/13/stories/2011041363180700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7160, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7063, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,Lokayukta', 'metaDesc' => ' “How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?” The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to...', 'disp' => '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>“How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?”<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said “No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.”<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: “Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />"The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.”<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. “We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.”<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: “We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.”</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7063, 'title' => 'Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<em><br /> </em> <div align="justify"> <em>“How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?”<br /> </em><br /> The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /> <br /> A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /> <br /> In its order, the Bench said “No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.”<br /> <br /> <em>Probe transfer<br /> </em><br /> The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /> <br /> The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /> <br /> The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /> <br /> On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: “Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /> <br /> "The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.”<br /> <br /> State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. “We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.”<br /> <br /> Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: “We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.” </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 13 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/13/stories/2011041363180700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'dont-undercut-lokayukta-rajasthan-told-by-j-venkatesan-7160', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7160, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7063 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,Lokayukta' $metaDesc = ' “How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?” The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to...' $disp = '<em><br /></em><div align="justify"><em>“How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?”<br /></em><br />The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry.<br /><br />In its order, the Bench said “No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.”<br /><br /><em>Probe transfer<br /></em><br />The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants.<br /><br />The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission.<br /><br />The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said.<br /><br />On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: “Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record?<br /><br />"The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.”<br /><br />State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. “We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.”<br /><br />Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: “We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.”</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Don't undercut Lokayukta, Rajasthan told by J Venkatesan |
“How is government aggrieved if illegal commission has been closed?”
The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Rajasthan High Court judgment transferring cases of alleged corruption during the Vasundhara Raje government, being probed by a State government-appointed Commission, to the Lokayukta. A Bench of Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu dismissed a special leave petition filed by the State government challenging the High Court's order, which set aside the constitution of the Justice N. N. Mathur Commission of Inquiry. In its order, the Bench said “No ground is made out for our interference with the impugned judgment under Article 136 of the Constitution.” Probe transfer The High Court had directed the transfer of investigation to the Lokayukta to draw its findings and recommendations in respect of charges against the former Chief Minister, Vasundhara Raje; former Ministers and some retired government servants. The SLP said the High Court was not justified in referring all works of the Commission to the Lokayukta as it was the prerogative and within the power of the government to appoint the Commission. The government felt that the setting up of the Commission was necessary in keeping with the people's demand for maintaining high standards of public administration to restore the confidence of the people in the governance, the SLP said. On Monday, the Bench took serious note of the State government filing an appeal against the High Court order. Justice Jain observed: “Why have you filed this appeal? How is the State government aggrieved if an illegal commission has been closed and a statutory authority like the Lokayukta asked to investigate any charge of corruption if there exists any material on record? "The State government has got no cause of action to challenge such a fair order. You must not undermine institutions like the Lokayukta in a State by framing illegal commissions or fact finding inquiry committees when the Lokayukta is there to take care of it.” State counsel said it was a policy decision of the government to have the corruption charges against the previous government inquired into. “We want to establish the evidence first before proceeding further.” Disagreeing with this stand, Justice Dattu said: “We fail to understand what prevented the State government from having recourse to the legal provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act as also the Rajasthan Lokayukta. We can't appreciate that a commission has been constituted by a State government with funds from the public exchequer bypassing the law.” |