Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815a10983907-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815a10983907-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815a10983907-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14221, 'title' => 'Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -CNN-IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With additional information from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 12 April, 2012, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/sc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-rte-act/247972-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14345, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14221, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Education', 'metaDesc' => ' -CNN-IBN &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14221, 'title' => 'Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -CNN-IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With additional information from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 12 April, 2012, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/sc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-rte-act/247972-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14345, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14221 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Education' $metaDesc = ' -CNN-IBN &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -CNN-IBN The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, "I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for "moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is "unconstitutional" and "violative" of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815a10983907-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815a10983907-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815a10983907-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14221, 'title' => 'Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -CNN-IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With additional information from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 12 April, 2012, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/sc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-rte-act/247972-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14345, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14221, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Education', 'metaDesc' => ' -CNN-IBN &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14221, 'title' => 'Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -CNN-IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With additional information from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 12 April, 2012, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/sc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-rte-act/247972-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14345, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14221 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Education' $metaDesc = ' -CNN-IBN &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -CNN-IBN The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, "I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for "moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is "unconstitutional" and "violative" of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815a10983907-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815a10983907-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815a10983907-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815a10983907-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14221, 'title' => 'Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -CNN-IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With additional information from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 12 April, 2012, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/sc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-rte-act/247972-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14345, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14221, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Education', 'metaDesc' => ' -CNN-IBN &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14221, 'title' => 'Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -CNN-IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With additional information from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 12 April, 2012, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/sc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-rte-act/247972-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14345, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14221 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Education' $metaDesc = ' -CNN-IBN &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, &quot;I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for &quot;moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and &quot;violative&quot; of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -CNN-IBN The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, "I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for "moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is "unconstitutional" and "violative" of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14221, 'title' => 'Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -CNN-IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, "I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for "moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is "unconstitutional" and "violative" of fundamental rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With additional information from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 12 April, 2012, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/sc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-rte-act/247972-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14345, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14221, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Education', 'metaDesc' => ' -CNN-IBN The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, "I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for "moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is "unconstitutional" and "violative" of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14221, 'title' => 'Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -CNN-IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, "I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for "moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is "unconstitutional" and "violative" of fundamental rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With additional information from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 12 April, 2012, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/sc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-rte-act/247972-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'economically-weaker-sections-will-have-25-per-cent-quota-in-schools-sc-on-right-to-education-act-14345', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14345, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14221 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Education' $metaDesc = ' -CNN-IBN The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-CNN-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, "I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for "moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is "unconstitutional" and "violative" of fundamental rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With additional information from PTI)</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Economically weaker sections will have 25 per cent quota in schools: SC on Right to Education Act |
-CNN-IBN The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the Constitutional validity of the Right to Education Act, saying that there will be 25 per cent reservation in government, local authority schools and private schools for children from the economically weaker sections of the society. A bench comprising Chief Justice SH Kapadia and justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, which had reserved its verdict on August 3, 2011, upheld the validity of provisions of the law that made the Right to Education a fundamental right of children in the age group of 6 to 14 years. The RTE Act will be applicable only for day schools and not for boarding schools. The RTE Act will also not be applicable in private minority schools. The RTE judgement will come into effect from Thursday and the court said prior admissions would not be affected. Reacting to the judgement, RTE Campaigner and lawyer Ashok Aggarwal said, "I am happy with the judgement. I am hoping that overall it will be a boost to the child centric policy of the government." The apex court order came in response to a host of petitions filed by private institutions challenging the Act for violating their autonomy. During the marathon arguments in the case which went for many months, the Centre had defended the law saying it was aimed at uplifting the socially and economically weaker section of society. The Centre had emphasised the need to de-link merit and talent from social and economic differences among different sections of society and said that the act calls for "moving towards composite classrooms with children from diverse backgrounds, rather than homogeneous and exclusivist schools". The main petitioner Society for Un-aided Private Schools, Rajasthan, and a host of associations representing various private schools questioned the validity of the Act on the ground that it impinged on their rights to run the educational institutions. The law was brought by introducing Article 21(A) in the Constitution which says the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children between six and 14 years in such a manner as the state may, by law, determine. The petitions had contended that the RTE Act, 2009, is "unconstitutional" and "violative" of fundamental rights. The petitioners had cited the Supreme Court's 11-judge Constitution bench ruling in TMA Pai case wherein it was ruled that maximum autonomy should be provided to private educational institutions. According to the petitioners, Section 3 of the Act imposed an absolute mandate on all schools, including private unaided and minority institutions, to admit without any choice each and every child whosoever comes to take admission in the schools in the neighbourhood. The provision prohibits any type of screening which is necessary for admission, the petitioners said. (With additional information from PTI)
|