Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of ₹5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of ₹45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released ₹4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against ₹17,000 crore that are needed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 25 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress/article6725308.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674891,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Loan Waiver,Debt Burden,Debt Relief,Farmers,farming,Agriculture,Food Security,Livelihood&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of ₹5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of ₹45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released ₹4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against ₹17,000 crore that are needed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 25 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress/article6725308.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674891,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26848
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Loan Waiver,Debt Burden,Debt Relief,Farmers,farming,Agriculture,Food Security,Livelihood&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify"><em>Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.</em></p><p align="justify">When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.</p><p align="justify">The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.</p><p align="justify">But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.</p><p align="justify">When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.</p><p align="justify">One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can't meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.</p><p align="justify">The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments' wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.</p><p align="justify">In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &lsquo;ineligible' farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.</p><p align="justify">Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &lsquo;inventive' methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.</p><p align="justify"><em>No benefit to farmers</em></p><p align="justify">All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.</p><p align="justify">There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.</p><p align="justify">Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.</p><p align="justify">Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.</p><p align="justify">The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.</p><p align="justify">Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.</p><p align="justify"><em>If there's a will</em></p><p align="justify">In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &lsquo;non-recourse' loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.</p><p align="justify">Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer's capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.</p><p align="justify">The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is an independent researcher</em></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of ₹5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of ₹45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released ₹4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against ₹17,000 crore that are needed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 25 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress/article6725308.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674891,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Loan Waiver,Debt Burden,Debt Relief,Farmers,farming,Agriculture,Food Security,Livelihood&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of ₹5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of ₹45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released ₹4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against ₹17,000 crore that are needed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 25 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress/article6725308.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674891,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26848
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Loan Waiver,Debt Burden,Debt Relief,Farmers,farming,Agriculture,Food Security,Livelihood&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify"><em>Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.</em></p><p align="justify">When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.</p><p align="justify">The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.</p><p align="justify">But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.</p><p align="justify">When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.</p><p align="justify">One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can't meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.</p><p align="justify">The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments' wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.</p><p align="justify">In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &lsquo;ineligible' farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.</p><p align="justify">Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &lsquo;inventive' methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.</p><p align="justify"><em>No benefit to farmers</em></p><p align="justify">All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.</p><p align="justify">There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.</p><p align="justify">Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.</p><p align="justify">Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.</p><p align="justify">The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.</p><p align="justify">Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.</p><p align="justify"><em>If there's a will</em></p><p align="justify">In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &lsquo;non-recourse' loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.</p><p align="justify">Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer's capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.</p><p align="justify">The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is an independent researcher</em></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f77fa1b5042-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of ₹5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of ₹45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released ₹4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against ₹17,000 crore that are needed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 25 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress/article6725308.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674891,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Loan Waiver,Debt Burden,Debt Relief,Farmers,farming,Agriculture,Food Security,Livelihood&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26848,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of ₹5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of ₹45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released ₹4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against ₹17,000 crore that are needed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 25 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress/article6725308.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674891,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26848
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Loan Waiver,Debt Burden,Debt Relief,Farmers,farming,Agriculture,Food Security,Livelihood&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can&#039;t meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments&#039; wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &amp;lsquo;ineligible&#039; farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &amp;lsquo;inventive&#039; methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;No benefit to farmers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;If there&#039;s a will&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &amp;lsquo;non-recourse&#039; loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer&#039;s capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The writer is an independent researcher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify"><em>Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.</em></p><p align="justify">When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.</p><p align="justify">The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.</p><p align="justify">But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.</p><p align="justify">When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.</p><p align="justify">One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can't meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.</p><p align="justify">The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments' wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.</p><p align="justify">In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &lsquo;ineligible' farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.</p><p align="justify">Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &lsquo;inventive' methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.</p><p align="justify"><em>No benefit to farmers</em></p><p align="justify">All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.</p><p align="justify">There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.</p><p align="justify">Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.</p><p align="justify">Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.</p><p align="justify">The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.</p><p align="justify">Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.</p><p align="justify"><em>If there's a will</em></p><p align="justify">In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &lsquo;non-recourse' loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.</p><p align="justify">Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer's capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.</p><p align="justify">The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is an independent researcher</em></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 26848,
		'title' => 'Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu Business Line
</div>
<p align="justify">
<em>Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of ₹5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of ₹45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released ₹4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against ₹17,000 crore that are needed.
</p>
<p align="justify">
When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.
</p>
<p align="justify">
One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can't meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments' wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &lsquo;ineligible' farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &lsquo;inventive' methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>No benefit to farmers</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.
</p>
<p align="justify">
There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>If there's a will</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &lsquo;non-recourse' loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer's capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>The writer is an independent researcher</em>
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu Business Line, 25 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress/article6725308.ece',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4674891,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 26848,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Loan Waiver,Debt Burden,Debt Relief,Farmers,farming,Agriculture,Food Security,Livelihood',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify"><em>Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.</em></p><p align="justify">When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.</p><p align="justify">The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.</p><p align="justify">But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.</p><p align="justify">When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.</p><p align="justify">One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can't meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.</p><p align="justify">The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments' wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.</p><p align="justify">In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &lsquo;ineligible' farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.</p><p align="justify">Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &lsquo;inventive' methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.</p><p align="justify"><em>No benefit to farmers</em></p><p align="justify">All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.</p><p align="justify">There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.</p><p align="justify">Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.</p><p align="justify">Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.</p><p align="justify">The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.</p><p align="justify">Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.</p><p align="justify"><em>If there's a will</em></p><p align="justify">In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &lsquo;non-recourse' loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.</p><p align="justify">Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer's capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.</p><p align="justify">The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is an independent researcher</em></p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 26848,
	'title' => 'Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu Business Line
</div>
<p align="justify">
<em>Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of ₹5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of ₹45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released ₹4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against ₹17,000 crore that are needed.
</p>
<p align="justify">
When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.
</p>
<p align="justify">
One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can't meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments' wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &lsquo;ineligible' farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &lsquo;inventive' methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>No benefit to farmers</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.
</p>
<p align="justify">
There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>If there's a will</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &lsquo;non-recourse' loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer's capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>The writer is an independent researcher</em>
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu Business Line, 25 December, 2014, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress/article6725308.ece',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'empty-promises-to-farmers-in-distress-psm-rao-4674891',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4674891,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 26848
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao'
$metaKeywords = 'Loan Waiver,Debt Burden,Debt Relief,Farmers,farming,Agriculture,Food Security,Livelihood'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu Business Line


Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.


When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line</div><p align="justify"><em>Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises.</em></p><p align="justify">When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them.</p><p align="justify">The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments.</p><p align="justify">But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed.</p><p align="justify">When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise.</p><p align="justify">One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can't meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default.</p><p align="justify">The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments' wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal.</p><p align="justify">In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the &lsquo;ineligible' farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules.</p><p align="justify">Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several &lsquo;inventive' methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help.</p><p align="justify"><em>No benefit to farmers</em></p><p align="justify">All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community.</p><p align="justify">There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future.</p><p align="justify">Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme.</p><p align="justify">Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans.</p><p align="justify">The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season.</p><p align="justify">Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner.</p><p align="justify"><em>If there's a will</em></p><p align="justify">In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of &lsquo;non-recourse' loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone.</p><p align="justify">Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer's capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent.</p><p align="justify">The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy.</p><p align="justify"><em>The writer is an independent researcher</em></p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Empty promises to farmers in distress -PSM Rao

-The Hindu Business Line Both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reneged on loan waiver promises. When Messrs Chandrababu Naidu and K Chandrasekhar Rao, chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana respectively, promised to waive farm loans, there was no reason to distrust them. The Election Commission clearly directed the politicians not to make any promises that could not be implemented. They thought all the farm loans would be written off once they formed their respective governments. But that was not to be. After a lot of dithering, the Andhra Pradesh government has made a paltry allocation of 5,000 crore against its conservatively estimated requirement of 45,000 crore, while its Telangana counterpart released 4,250 crore - the first of four annual tranches - against 17,000 crore that are needed. When the governments could not hide the fact that the loan waiver was beyond their means, they tried three things to wriggle out of their promise. One, they found excuses for non-implementation, such as unfairly blaming the banks and the Reserve Bank of India for their non-cooperation. After all, banks are the institutions that accept deposits from the public to lend to the needy. They can't meet their obligations to depositors when borrowers default. The RBI cannot ask the banks to reschedule the loans according to the State governments' wishes. The regulator has to follow its own norms. It can advise rescheduling only when the crop yield in a given area is less than 50 per cent of the normal. In fact, it did approve rescheduling wherever these norms were fulfilled; in 100 out of 475 mandals of Telangana and 120 of 653 of Andhra Pradesh. Two, the governments have made or are making all-out efforts to reduce the burden by eliminating the ‘ineligible' farmers to the extent possible, using all sorts of loopholes in the rules. Three, the burden is being sought to be postponed through several ‘inventive' methods such as issuing bonds to the borrowers. The queerest proposal is asking the farmers themselves to first repay the loans with the assurance to reimburse them later. If the farmers could have paid, they would have paid, without waiting for government help. No benefit to farmers All this is not to say that the farm loans should never be waived nor that it is beyond the capacity of the governments to do so. It is only to assert that the schemes are not well thought out and bring little benefit to the farming community. There is no effective plan, together with the present waiver, for the development of agriculture in these States, bringing down the need for such waivers in future. Also, the benefit is limited only to institutional borrowers. The Rangarajan Committee on financial inclusion has pointed out that only 27 per cent of farm households are able to avail of institutional credit; therefore, 73 per cent of the farmers who do not get bank loans will be outside the scheme. Similarly, the majority of small and marginal farmers who account for 84.93 per cent of all farm holdings (2010-11 official data) do not get bank credit, and therefore are outside the scheme. A World Bank report said that 87 per cent of marginal and 70 per cent of small farmers do not get bank loans. The waiver promise has done more harm than good to the farmers as they could not avail fresh loans this kharif season. Having learnt these lessons, the Centre should now have a fresh perspective on the rural credit scenario in India and should work out a comprehensive plan to give relief to farmers in distress in an effective manner. If there's a will In a recent study by this writer for the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, the American model of ‘non-recourse' loans, suitably modified, was found suitable for India. Under this model, the farmers need not pay back the government in case of crop failure, because security for loan is limited to the crop alone. Also, the farmer is not forced to repay the full amount when yield was low or market prices were not optimal. In a sense the loan is settled either through waiver or payment depending on the farmer's capability. The US government bears the insurance premium burden to a substantial extent. The Indian government cannot afford to ignore agriculture. There is no way of getting food for 1.27 billion people other than producing it locally; and 48.9 per cent of employment accrues from agriculture. In other words, the government should be responsible to the farmer in the interest of protecting overall food and employment security. Piecemeal measures and populist gimmickry cannot work as substitutes for long-term policy. The writer is an independent researcher