Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 3 October, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/excji-law-panel-also-opposed-postretirement-jobs/1011022/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17365,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 3 October, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/excji-law-panel-also-opposed-postretirement-jobs/1011022/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17365,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17237
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.<br /><br />Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&rdquo; and favoured a two-year &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.<br /><br />In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.<br /><br />&ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.<br /><br />In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&rdquo;, observed, &ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&rdquo;<br /><br />The commission further said, &ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.<br /><br />As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 3 October, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/excji-law-panel-also-opposed-postretirement-jobs/1011022/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17365,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 3 October, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/excji-law-panel-also-opposed-postretirement-jobs/1011022/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17365,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17237
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.<br /><br />Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&rdquo; and favoured a two-year &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.<br /><br />In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.<br /><br />&ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.<br /><br />In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&rdquo;, observed, &ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&rdquo;<br /><br />The commission further said, &ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.<br /><br />As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr682591e3b2722-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr682591e3b2722-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 3 October, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/excji-law-panel-also-opposed-postretirement-jobs/1011022/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17365,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17237,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 3 October, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/excji-law-panel-also-opposed-postretirement-jobs/1011022/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17365,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17237
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &amp;ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&amp;rdquo; and favoured a two-year &amp;ldquo;cooling-off&amp;rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&amp;rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &amp;ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&amp;rdquo;, observed, &amp;ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission further said, &amp;ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&amp;rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.<br /><br />Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&rdquo; and favoured a two-year &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.<br /><br />In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.<br /><br />&ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.<br /><br />In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&rdquo;, observed, &ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&rdquo;<br /><br />The commission further said, &ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.<br /><br />As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 17237,
		'title' => 'Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express<br />
<br />
While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.<br />
<br />
Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&rdquo; and favoured a two-year &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.<br />
<br />
In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.<br />
<br />
In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&rdquo;, observed, &ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The commission further said, &ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.<br />
<br />
As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/excji-law-panel-also-opposed-postretirement-jobs/1011022/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 17365,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 17237,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.<br /><br />Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&rdquo; and favoured a two-year &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.<br /><br />In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.<br /><br />&ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.<br /><br />In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&rdquo;, observed, &ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&rdquo;<br /><br />The commission further said, &ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.<br /><br />As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 17237,
	'title' => 'Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express<br />
<br />
While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.<br />
<br />
Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&rdquo; and favoured a two-year &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.<br />
<br />
In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.<br />
<br />
In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&rdquo;, observed, &ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The commission further said, &ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.<br />
<br />
As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/excji-law-panel-also-opposed-postretirement-jobs/1011022/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'ex-cji-law-panel-also-opposed-post-retirement-jobs-maneesh-chhibber-17365',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 17365,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 17237
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber'
$metaKeywords = 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
-The Indian Express

While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past.<br /><br />Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the &ldquo;clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary&rdquo; and favoured a two-year &ldquo;cooling-off&rdquo; period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions.<br /><br />In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,&rdquo; Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010.<br /><br />&ldquo;Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,&rdquo; Justice Verma told The Indian Express.<br /><br />In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on &ldquo;Reforms of the Judicial Administration&rdquo;, observed, &ldquo;There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.&rdquo;<br /><br />The commission further said, &ldquo;We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.&rdquo; It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation.<br /><br />As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Ex-CJI, law panel also opposed post-retirement jobs -Maneesh Chhibber

-The Indian Express While Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley may have been the first frontline politician to raise the issue of a “cooling-off” period for retired judges, many who have been a part of the higher judiciary have voiced this concern in the past. Former union law minister Jaitley said on Sunday that the “clamour for post-retirement jobs among judges is affecting the impartiality of the judiciary” and favoured a two-year “cooling-off” period before retired judges are appointed to tribunals and commissions. In the past, former Chief Justice of India J S Verma was among those who red-flagged the threat to judicial independence due to judges falling to the lure of post-retirement jobs in the government. “One such method to penetrate the resolve of even a few of the best is the temptation of lucrative post-retirement benefits given by the executive to a favoured few. The obverse of the constitutional guarantee of security of tenure and conditions of service is the obligation of such constitutional functionaries to the observance of a code of post-retiral conduct eschewing any such temptation,” Justice Verma cautioned in his S Govind Swaminadhan Memorial Lecture at the Madras High Court in 2010. “Some recent instances where sitting judges have been recommended for appointment to government posts much before they actually retire is very disturbing. I find that unacceptable. I have always held that post-retirement conduct of judges should be regulated to ensure that they have not been influenced by any extraneous factor of post-retirement jobs during their tenure. Any chamber practice or arbitration of private disputes should not be allowed. To achieve this, Article 124(7) must be amended,” Justice Verma told The Indian Express. In fact, as early as in 1958, the first Law Commission of India headed by jurist M C Setalvad, in its 14th report on “Reforms of the Judicial Administration”, observed, “There can be no doubt that it is clearly undesirable that Supreme Court judges should look forward to other government employment after their retirement. The government is a party in a large number of cases in the highest court and the average citizen may well get the impression that a judge who might look forward to being employed by the government after his retirement does not bring to bear on his work that detachment of outlook which is expected of a judge in cases in which the government is a party.” The commission further said, “We are clearly of the view that the practice has a tendency to affect the independence of judges and should be discontinued.” It also recommended that a law be brought to bar retired judges from getting government jobs after their retirement. But successive governments chose not to implement the recommendation. As already reported, of the 23 judges who have retired from the Supreme Court since January 2008, 18 got jobs in different government commissions and tribunals, with many of them continuing in these positions.