Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10154, 'title' => 'Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Times of India </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /> <br /> The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /> <br /> Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /> <br /> He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br /> National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /> <br /> Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br /> &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /> <br /> A POOR IDEA<br /> <br /> &bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /> <br /> &bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /> <br /> &bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 September, 2011, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=ETNEW&amp;BaseHref=ETD/2011/09/22&amp;PageLabel=2&amp;Enti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10264, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10154, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />&ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />&bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />&bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />&bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10154, 'title' => 'Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Times of India </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /> <br /> The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /> <br /> Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /> <br /> He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br /> National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /> <br /> Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br /> &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /> <br /> A POOR IDEA<br /> <br /> &bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /> <br /> &bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /> <br /> &bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 September, 2011, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=ETNEW&amp;BaseHref=ETD/2011/09/22&amp;PageLabel=2&amp;Enti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10264, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10154 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a...' $disp = '<p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />&ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />&bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />&bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />&bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Times of India</p><p> </p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. “The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,” the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. “Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,” BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />“This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition… This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,” Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. “By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,” he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />“I don’t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,” said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />• According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />• BJP renewed attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />• NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10154, 'title' => 'Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Times of India </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /> <br /> The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /> <br /> Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /> <br /> He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br /> National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /> <br /> Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br /> &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /> <br /> A POOR IDEA<br /> <br /> &bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /> <br /> &bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /> <br /> &bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 September, 2011, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=ETNEW&amp;BaseHref=ETD/2011/09/22&amp;PageLabel=2&amp;Enti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10264, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10154, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />&ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />&bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />&bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />&bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10154, 'title' => 'Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Times of India </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /> <br /> The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /> <br /> Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /> <br /> He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br /> National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /> <br /> Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br /> &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /> <br /> A POOR IDEA<br /> <br /> &bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /> <br /> &bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /> <br /> &bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 September, 2011, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=ETNEW&amp;BaseHref=ETD/2011/09/22&amp;PageLabel=2&amp;Enti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10264, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10154 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a...' $disp = '<p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />&ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />&bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />&bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />&bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Times of India</p><p> </p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. “The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,” the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. “Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,” BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />“This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition… This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,” Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. “By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,” he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />“I don’t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,” said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />• According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />• BJP renewed attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />• NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813da1b56c55-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10154, 'title' => 'Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Times of India </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /> <br /> The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /> <br /> Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /> <br /> He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br /> National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /> <br /> Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br /> &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /> <br /> A POOR IDEA<br /> <br /> &bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /> <br /> &bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /> <br /> &bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 September, 2011, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=ETNEW&amp;BaseHref=ETD/2011/09/22&amp;PageLabel=2&amp;Enti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10264, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10154, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />&ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />&bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />&bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />&bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10154, 'title' => 'Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Times of India </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /> <br /> The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /> <br /> Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /> <br /> He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br /> National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /> <br /> Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br /> &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /> <br /> A POOR IDEA<br /> <br /> &bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /> <br /> &bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /> <br /> &bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 September, 2011, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=ETNEW&amp;BaseHref=ETD/2011/09/22&amp;PageLabel=2&amp;Enti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10264, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10154 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India &nbsp; Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a...' $disp = '<p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. &ldquo;The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,&rdquo; the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. &ldquo;Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,&rdquo; BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />&ldquo;This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition&hellip; This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,&rdquo; Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. &ldquo;By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,&rdquo; he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,&rdquo; said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />&bull; According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />&bull; BJP renewed attack on the &ldquo;economist Prime Minister&rdquo; alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />&bull; NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it &ldquo;reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.&rdquo; <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Times of India</p><p> </p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. “The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,” the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. “Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,” BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />“This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition… This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,” Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. “By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,” he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />“I don’t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,” said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />• According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />• BJP renewed attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />• NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10154, 'title' => 'Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Times of India </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /> <br /> The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. “The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,” the affidavit said.<br /> <br /> Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. “Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,” BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /> <br /> “This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition… This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,” Javadekar said.<br /> <br /> He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. “By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,” he said.<br /> National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /> <br /> Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br /> “I don’t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,” said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /> <br /> A POOR IDEA<br /> <br /> • According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /> <br /> • BJP renewed attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /> <br /> • NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 September, 2011, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=ETNEW&BaseHref=ETD/2011/09/22&PageLabel=2&Enti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10264, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10154, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Times of India</p><p> </p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. “The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,” the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. “Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,” BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />“This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition… This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,” Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. “By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,” he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />“I don’t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,” said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />• According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />• BJP renewed attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />• NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10154, 'title' => 'Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Times of India </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /> <br /> The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /> <br /> According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. “The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,” the affidavit said.<br /> <br /> Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. “Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,” BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /> <br /> “This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition… This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,” Javadekar said.<br /> <br /> He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. “By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,” he said.<br /> National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /> <br /> Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br /> “I don’t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,” said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /> <br /> A POOR IDEA<br /> <br /> • According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /> <br /> • BJP renewed attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /> <br /> • NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 September, 2011, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=ETNEW&BaseHref=ETD/2011/09/22&PageLabel=2&Enti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'facing-anti-poor-label-govt-asks-plan-panel-to-revise-joke-of-an-affidavit-10264', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10264, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10154 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit. The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a...' $disp = '<p>-The Times of India</p><p> </p><div align="justify">Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.<br /><br />The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court.<br /><br />According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. “The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,” the affidavit said.<br /><br />Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. “Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,” BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation.<br /><br />“This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition… This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,” Javadekar said.<br /><br />He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. “By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,” he said.<br />National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey.<br /><br />Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data.<br />“I don’t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,” said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.<br /><br />A POOR IDEA<br /><br />• According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line<br /><br />• BJP renewed attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters<br /><br />• NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Facing Anti-Poor Label, Govt Asks Plan Panel to Revise Joke of an Affidavit |
-The Times of India
Faced with fierce criticism over the Planning Commission’s new criteria for poverty line, the Government has asked the Plan panel to revise its affidavit.
The Planning Commission had said that that those spending more than Rs. 32 a day in urban areas, or Rs. 26 a day in villages, would no longer be eligible to draw benefits meant for those living below the poverty line. The new tentative criteria was worked out by the plan panel and approved by the Prime Minister's Office before the affidavit was submitted before the Supreme Court. According to the Planning Commission yardstick, Rs. 32 was sufficient for cereals, pulses, milk, edible oil, spices, vegetables, fruits, cooking fuel, conveyance, education, footwear, clothes in urban areas and Rs. 26 in villages. “The poverty line at June 2011 price level can be placed provisionally at Rs. 965 per capita per month in urban areas and Rs. 781 per capita per month in rural areas. At June 2011 price level, for a family of five this provisional poverty line would amount to Rs. 4,824 per month in urban areas and Rs. 3,905 per month in rural areas,” the affidavit said. Cornering the government on this, the Opposition dubbed the new criteria as a cruel joke. “Its like rubbing salt in the wounds of the poor by coming up with the new definition of Rs. 32 a day in urban areas and Rs. 25 a day in rural areas for those below poverty line,” BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said at a press conference here. The BJP also renewed its attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters like checking inflation. “This Rs. 32, which is less than a dollar, included medicines, transportation and food. It does not factor in housing. So where do people live? It does not address the problem of malnutrition… This is not removal of poverty but derecognizing the poor itself,” Javadekar said. He said the poor were already suffering because of price rise and corruption and announced that BJP will take to the streets to protest against the government on the issue. BJP, which has made corruption and price rise its twin political weapons to take on the Congress-led UPA, has dared the government for a discussion on the BPL criterion. “By defining . 965 pm in urban areas and Rs 781 pm for rural India as a benchmark of the poverty, the government has backstabbed the Aam Aadmi,” he said. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy had also castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” She said it was aimed at reducing the number of BPL persons to reduce government expenditure on the poor. The Planning Commission has said that the final poverty lines would be available only after the completion of the 2011-12 National Sample Survey (NSS) Survey. Congress tried to underplay the controversy, saying these were matters decided on the basis of empirical statistical data and must be left to the judgment of experts who spend considerable time analyzing such data. “I don’t think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand as a frivolous exercise but let me equally make it clear this is certainly not the last word. All inputs of the constructive nature in this regard are welcome and if there are any conceptual reasons, then certain changes can be looked at and all this should be provided in a constructive manner to the Planning Commission,” said party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi. A POOR IDEA • According to Planning Commission, those spending more than . 32 a day in urban areasand . 26 a day in villages will be above the poverty line • BJP renewed attack on the “economist Prime Minister” alleging he had failed in management of economic parameters • NAC member Aruna Roy had castigated the Planning Commission's criteria saying it “reflected government's deep lack of empathy for the poor and a perspective completely divorced from reality.” |