Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68057063302cf-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68057063302cf-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68057063302cf-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19943, 'title' => 'Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Financial Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. </p> <p align="justify"> A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement. </p> <p align="justify"> The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. </p> <p align="justify"> The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. </p> <p align="justify"> The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. </p> <p align="justify"> The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. </p> <p align="justify"> However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 22 March, 2013, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/farmers-bodies-flay-food-security-bill/1091537', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20084, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 19943, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Farmers,Agriculture,subsidies', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19943, 'title' => 'Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Financial Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. </p> <p align="justify"> A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement. </p> <p align="justify"> The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. </p> <p align="justify"> The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. </p> <p align="justify"> The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. </p> <p align="justify"> The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. </p> <p align="justify"> However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 22 March, 2013, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/farmers-bodies-flay-food-security-bill/1091537', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20084, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 19943 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Farmers,Agriculture,subsidies' $metaDesc = ' -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would "lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains".</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the "nationalisation of agriculture" would "greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers". In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call "the downslide of Indian agriculture".</p><p align="justify">"The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term," Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government "will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain". "This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity," Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68057063302cf-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68057063302cf-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68057063302cf-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19943, 'title' => 'Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Financial Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. </p> <p align="justify"> A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement. </p> <p align="justify"> The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. </p> <p align="justify"> The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. </p> <p align="justify"> The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. </p> <p align="justify"> The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. </p> <p align="justify"> However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 22 March, 2013, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/farmers-bodies-flay-food-security-bill/1091537', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20084, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 19943, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Farmers,Agriculture,subsidies', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19943, 'title' => 'Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Financial Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. </p> <p align="justify"> A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement. </p> <p align="justify"> The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. </p> <p align="justify"> The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. </p> <p align="justify"> The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. </p> <p align="justify"> The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. </p> <p align="justify"> However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 22 March, 2013, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/farmers-bodies-flay-food-security-bill/1091537', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20084, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 19943 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Farmers,Agriculture,subsidies' $metaDesc = ' -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would "lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains".</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the "nationalisation of agriculture" would "greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers". In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call "the downslide of Indian agriculture".</p><p align="justify">"The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term," Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government "will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain". "This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity," Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68057063302cf-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68057063302cf-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68057063302cf-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68057063302cf-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19943, 'title' => 'Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Financial Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. </p> <p align="justify"> A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement. </p> <p align="justify"> The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. </p> <p align="justify"> The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. </p> <p align="justify"> The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. </p> <p align="justify"> The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. </p> <p align="justify"> However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 22 March, 2013, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/farmers-bodies-flay-food-security-bill/1091537', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20084, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 19943, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Farmers,Agriculture,subsidies', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19943, 'title' => 'Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Financial Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. </p> <p align="justify"> A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement. </p> <p align="justify"> The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. </p> <p align="justify"> The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. </p> <p align="justify"> The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. </p> <p align="justify"> The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. </p> <p align="justify"> However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 22 March, 2013, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/farmers-bodies-flay-food-security-bill/1091537', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20084, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 19943 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers&#039; bodies flay food security Bill' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Farmers,Agriculture,subsidies' $metaDesc = ' -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would &quot;lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the &quot;nationalisation of agriculture&quot; would &quot;greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers&quot;. In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call &quot;the downslide of Indian agriculture&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term,&quot; Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government &quot;will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain&quot;. &quot;This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity,&quot; Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would "lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains".</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the "nationalisation of agriculture" would "greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers". In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call "the downslide of Indian agriculture".</p><p align="justify">"The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term," Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government "will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain". "This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity," Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19943, 'title' => 'Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Financial Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. </p> <p align="justify"> A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would "lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains". </p> <p align="justify"> Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the "nationalisation of agriculture" would "greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers". In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call "the downslide of Indian agriculture". </p> <p align="justify"> "The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term," Joshi said in a statement. </p> <p align="justify"> The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. </p> <p align="justify"> The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. </p> <p align="justify"> The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government "will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain". "This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity," Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. </p> <p align="justify"> The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. </p> <p align="justify"> However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 22 March, 2013, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/farmers-bodies-flay-food-security-bill/1091537', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20084, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 19943, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Farmers,Agriculture,subsidies', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would "lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains".</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the "nationalisation of agriculture" would "greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers". In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call "the downslide of Indian agriculture".</p><p align="justify">"The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term," Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government "will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain". "This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity," Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 19943, 'title' => 'Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Financial Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. </p> <p align="justify"> A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would "lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains". </p> <p align="justify"> Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the "nationalisation of agriculture" would "greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers". In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call "the downslide of Indian agriculture". </p> <p align="justify"> "The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term," Joshi said in a statement. </p> <p align="justify"> The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. </p> <p align="justify"> The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. </p> <p align="justify"> The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government "will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain". "This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity," Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. </p> <p align="justify"> The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. </p> <p align="justify"> However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 22 March, 2013, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/farmers-bodies-flay-food-security-bill/1091537', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'farmers039-bodies-flay-food-security-bill-20084', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20084, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 19943 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Farmers,Agriculture,subsidies' $metaDesc = ' -The Financial Express Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups. A couple of national-level farmers' organisations...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><br /> Leading economists who fear that the cost of the food security law on the exchequer would be much higher than estimated by the government have a seemingly unlikely ally - farmers' groups.</p><p align="justify">A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would "lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains".</p><p align="justify">Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the "nationalisation of agriculture" would "greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers". In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call "the downslide of Indian agriculture".</p><p align="justify">"The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term," Joshi said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal.</p><p align="justify">The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively.</p><p align="justify">The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government "will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain". "This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity," Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output.</p><p align="justify">Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg.</p><p align="justify">The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well.</p><p align="justify">However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Farmers' bodies flay food security Bill |
-The Financial Express
A couple of national-level farmers' organisations have opposed the National Food Security Bill, saying it would "lead to nationalisation of agriculture by making the government the biggest buyer, hoarder and seller of foodgrains". Farmers' representatives from a dozen states, led by Shetkari Sanghatana founder Sharad Joshi and Bharatiya Kisan Union's Bupinder Singh Mann, said the "nationalisation of agriculture" would "greatly distort the market mechanism and reduce the bargaining power of farmers". In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, they have urged the government to stop what they call "the downslide of Indian agriculture". "The food security Bill will significantly increase the fiscal deficit at a time when the Indian economy is not showing any sign of recovery. This will increase the pressure on the government to restrict the minimum support price, while keeping the selling price of subsidised foodgrains very low. The farmers will get squeezed both by the government procurement price and by the depressed market price in the short term," Joshi said in a statement. The government has budgeted R90,000 crore for food subsidy during 2013-14, but officials told FE that the actual subsidy might touch R1,24,747 crore (including R10,000 crore for a scheme for lactating mothers) if the Bill is made an Act and implemented, which would be R23,800 crore more than the subsidy the government may have to bear if the Act isn't implemented in the next fiscal. This is at a time when the government targets to trim the fiscal deficit to 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 from 5.2% in the current fiscal. The Cabinet cleared the revised draft food security Bill on Tuesday, which is expected to be introduced in the current session of Parliament. The Bill provides legal entitlement for 5 kg of heavily subsidised food grains to each beneficiary per month, which would cover around 70% of the country's population. The beneficiary would get rice, wheat and coarse grains at R3, 2 and 1 per kg, respectively. The farmers' groups said by offering the grains at heavily subsidised rates, the government "will take away the incentive for small and marginal farmers to grow foodgrain". "This will actually increase food insecurity, shortages and fuel food inflation, in a way similar to MGNREGS, which has added to labour cost without contributing meaningfully towards increasing agricultural productivity," Joshi said. The government needs around 61 million tonnes of grains a year to implement the Act, which is nearly one-fourth of the country's total foodgrain output. Although the Bill is touted to be the UPA's biggest populist measure, several analysts have also expressed concerns about its impact on government finances. A team of experts headed by Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices chairman Ashok Gulati says in a report that the government's stated expenditure of R1,20,000 crore annually in the the National Food Security Bill is merely the tip of the iceberg. The report says the government would have to shell out as much as Rs 6,82,163 crore over three years to implement the Bill and would hurt the farm sector in the long run as well. However, the costs projected by the experts include not just food subsidy burden, but the likely expenditure in the farm sector to ramp up production to cater for the need to procure more, and the cost of establishing a whole set-up as well as storage facilities, among others, to broaden the scope of procurement and distribution. |