Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 6 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150707/jsp/nation/story_30133.jsp#.VZt32fk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676617,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Ordinance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 6 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150707/jsp/nation/story_30133.jsp#.VZt32fk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676617,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28564
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Ordinance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which...&#039;
$disp = &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                -The Telegraph<br /><div align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.<br /><br />The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.<br /><br />These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.<br /><br />By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.<br /><br />A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.<br /><br />Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.<br /><br />Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &quot;in due course&quot;.<br /><br />R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &quot;at the appropriate time&quot;.<br /><br />Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party's views on the bill.<br /><br />Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.<br /><br />The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.<br /><br />It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.<br /><br />Most of the Opposition has hung an &quot;anti-farmer&quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.<br /><br />Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.<br /><br />The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.<br /><br />Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.<br /><br />Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.<br /><br />Some of the Sangh's frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.<br /><br />The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.<br /><br />Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.<br /><br />&quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&quot; Boianapalli said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 6 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150707/jsp/nation/story_30133.jsp#.VZt32fk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676617,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Ordinance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 6 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150707/jsp/nation/story_30133.jsp#.VZt32fk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676617,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28564
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Ordinance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which...&#039;
$disp = &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                -The Telegraph<br /><div align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.<br /><br />The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.<br /><br />These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.<br /><br />By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.<br /><br />A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.<br /><br />Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.<br /><br />Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &quot;in due course&quot;.<br /><br />R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &quot;at the appropriate time&quot;.<br /><br />Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party's views on the bill.<br /><br />Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.<br /><br />The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.<br /><br />It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.<br /><br />Most of the Opposition has hung an &quot;anti-farmer&quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.<br /><br />Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.<br /><br />The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.<br /><br />Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.<br /><br />Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.<br /><br />Some of the Sangh's frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.<br /><br />The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.<br /><br />Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.<br /><br />&quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&quot; Boianapalli said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f269ee77bf1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 6 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150707/jsp/nation/story_30133.jsp#.VZt32fk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676617,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Ordinance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28564,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 6 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150707/jsp/nation/story_30133.jsp#.VZt32fk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676617,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28564
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Ordinance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which...&#039;
$disp = &#039;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &amp;quot;in due course&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &amp;quot;at the appropriate time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party&#039;s views on the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of the Opposition has hung an &amp;quot;anti-farmer&amp;quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some of the Sangh&#039;s frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&amp;quot; Boianapalli said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                -The Telegraph<br /><div align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.<br /><br />The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.<br /><br />These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.<br /><br />By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.<br /><br />A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.<br /><br />Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.<br /><br />Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &quot;in due course&quot;.<br /><br />R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &quot;at the appropriate time&quot;.<br /><br />Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party's views on the bill.<br /><br />Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.<br /><br />The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.<br /><br />It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.<br /><br />Most of the Opposition has hung an &quot;anti-farmer&quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.<br /><br />Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.<br /><br />The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.<br /><br />Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.<br /><br />Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.<br /><br />Some of the Sangh's frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.<br /><br />The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.<br /><br />Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.<br /><br />&quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&quot; Boianapalli said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 28564,
		'title' => 'Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '-The Telegraph<br />
<div align="justify">
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.<br />
<br />
The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.<br />
<br />
These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.<br />
<br />
By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.<br />
<br />
A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.<br />
<br />
Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.<br />
<br />
Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &quot;in due course&quot;.<br />
<br />
R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &quot;at the appropriate time&quot;.<br />
<br />
Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party's views on the bill.<br />
<br />
Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.<br />
<br />
The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.<br />
<br />
It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.<br />
<br />
Most of the Opposition has hung an &quot;anti-farmer&quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.<br />
<br />
Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.<br />
<br />
The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.<br />
<br />
Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.<br />
<br />
Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.<br />
<br />
Some of the Sangh's frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.<br />
<br />
The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.<br />
<br />
Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.<br />
<br />
&quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&quot; Boianapalli said.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 6 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150707/jsp/nation/story_30133.jsp#.VZt32fk1t_k',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4676617,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 28564,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Ordinance',
	'metaDesc' => '-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which...',
	'disp' => '-The Telegraph<br /><div align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.<br /><br />The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.<br /><br />These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.<br /><br />By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.<br /><br />A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.<br /><br />Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.<br /><br />Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &quot;in due course&quot;.<br /><br />R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &quot;at the appropriate time&quot;.<br /><br />Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party's views on the bill.<br /><br />Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.<br /><br />The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.<br /><br />It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.<br /><br />Most of the Opposition has hung an &quot;anti-farmer&quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.<br /><br />Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.<br /><br />The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.<br /><br />Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.<br /><br />Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.<br /><br />Some of the Sangh's frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.<br /><br />The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.<br /><br />Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.<br /><br />&quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&quot; Boianapalli said.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 28564,
	'title' => 'Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '-The Telegraph<br />
<div align="justify">
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.<br />
<br />
The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.<br />
<br />
These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.<br />
<br />
By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.<br />
<br />
A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.<br />
<br />
Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.<br />
<br />
Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &quot;in due course&quot;.<br />
<br />
R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &quot;at the appropriate time&quot;.<br />
<br />
Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party's views on the bill.<br />
<br />
Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.<br />
<br />
The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.<br />
<br />
It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.<br />
<br />
Most of the Opposition has hung an &quot;anti-farmer&quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.<br />
<br />
Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.<br />
<br />
The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.<br />
<br />
Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.<br />
<br />
Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.<br />
<br />
Some of the Sangh's frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.<br />
<br />
The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.<br />
<br />
Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.<br />
<br />
&quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&quot; Boianapalli said.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 6 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150707/jsp/nation/story_30133.jsp#.VZt32fk1t_k',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'fence-sitter-six-in-land-bill-spotlight-basant-kumar-mohanty-4676617',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4676617,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 28564
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty'
$metaKeywords = 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Ordinance'
$metaDesc = '-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.

The score is now tied 12-12, which...'
$disp = '-The Telegraph<br /><div align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel.<br /><br />The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest.<br /><br />These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena.<br /><br />By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections.<br /><br />A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks.<br /><br />Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded.<br /><br />Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide &quot;in due course&quot;.<br /><br />R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide &quot;at the appropriate time&quot;.<br /><br />Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party's views on the bill.<br /><br />Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached.<br /><br />The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development.<br /><br />It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned.<br /><br />Most of the Opposition has hung an &quot;anti-farmer&quot; label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice.<br /><br />Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party.<br /><br />The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member.<br /><br />Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline.<br /><br />Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill.<br /><br />Some of the Sangh's frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries.<br /><br />The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors.<br /><br />Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16.<br /><br />&quot;After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand,&quot; Boianapalli said.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Fence-sitter Six in land bill spotlight -Basant Kumar Mohanty

-The Telegraph New Delhi: Six of the 30 MPs on the joint parliamentary committee examining the land acquisition bill appear undecided, with the BJP hoping to woo them and gain a majority on the panel. The score is now tied 12-12, which means the government needs the support of at least four of the six remaining members, who have so far kept their cards close to their chest. These half-dozen are from the AIADMK, Biju Janata Dal, Telangana Rashtra Samiti, Telugu Desam Party, YSR Congress and the Shiv Sena. By July 28, seven days after the monsoon session begins, the joint committee must hand its report to Parliament, which will reconsider the bill which had passed in the Lok Sabha last session but stalled in the Opposition-dominated Rajya Sabha. Such panel reports usually reflect the majority opinion on the panel while the dissenters, if any, are allowed to register their objections. A favourable report, however, can only give the government a psychological boost and perhaps a moral victory of sorts - it will still need to do the hard work of breaching the Opposition ranks. Contacted by The Telegraph, the six MPs under the spotlight remained guarded. Telangana Rashtra Samiti member Vinod Kumar Boianapalli said he had discussed the matter with party chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao two days ago, and that the party would decide "in due course". R.K. Bharathi Mohan of the AIADMK too said his party would decide "at the appropriate time". Shiv Sena member Anandrao Adsul disconnected the call when asked about his party's views on the bill. Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab and Desam MP Murali Mohan Maganti did not respond to calls to their cellphones while YSR Congress member Vara Prasadarao Valegapalli could not be reached. The bill looks to tweak the UPA-steered 2013 land law, waiving the requirements for landowner consent and a social impact study in the case of certain kinds of projects on the ground of facilitating development. It also dilutes the five-year deadline after which the existing law requires any acquired but unused land to be returned. Most of the Opposition has hung an "anti-farmer" label on the bill, which is meant to replace an ordinance that has been renewed twice. Sources said the 12 panel members hostile to the bill include five from the Congress, two from the Trinamul Congress and one each from the CPM, Janata Dal United, Nationalist Congress party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party. The BJP has 11 members on the panel and expects support also from the lone Lok Janshakti Party member. Sources have said that most of the organisations and individuals that deposed before the panel or wrote to it have opposed the bill, mainly because of the dilution of the provisions on consent, social impact assessment and the land return deadline. Even many Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh affiliates like the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch have opposed some of the proposed amendments. Sangh farmer arm Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, though, recently signalled a possible softening of its stance against the bill. Some of the Sangh's frontal organisations have stressed that acquisition of farmland and forestland should be avoided and that the government should not acquire land for private industries. The bill allows the acquisition of farmland for public-private partnership (PPP) projects and industrial corridors. Source said the panel met today but did not have much discussion. It will hear officials of the department of land resources on July 16. "After hearing the government officials, I will again discuss the matter with our party and take a stand," Boianapalli said.