Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1252, 'title' => 'Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 February, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-Experts/articleshow/5601003.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1328, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1252, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1252, 'title' => 'Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 February, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-Experts/articleshow/5601003.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1328, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1252 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1252, 'title' => 'Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 February, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-Experts/articleshow/5601003.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1328, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1252, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1252, 'title' => 'Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 February, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-Experts/articleshow/5601003.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1328, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1252 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f20d0defc08-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1252, 'title' => 'Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 February, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-Experts/articleshow/5601003.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1328, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1252, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1252, 'title' => 'Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 February, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-Experts/articleshow/5601003.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1328, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1252 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1252, 'title' => 'Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 February, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-Experts/articleshow/5601003.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1328, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1252, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1252, 'title' => 'Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 February, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-Experts/articleshow/5601003.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fertilizer-plan-wont-help-soil-experts-by-amit-bhattacharya-1328', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1328, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1252 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Fertilizer plan won’t help soil: Experts by Amit Bhattacharya |
The new nutrient based subsidy (NBS) regime cleared by the Union Cabinet on Thursday is likely to slash the governments subsidy bill and boost fertilizer production. But one of the major stated aims of the policy that of promoting a more balanced use of fertilizers by farmers may not be actualized unless other measures are implemented in tandem. That seems to be the view of many agriculture experts and economists, who reacted to the governments announcement of decontrolling the prices of all fertilizers, except nitrogen-based urea, from April 1 this year. The policy, in part, seeks to address the problem with the existing subsidy regime, which is skewed in favour of urea, leading to its overuse by farmers to the detriment of other essential nutrients. By decontrolling the prices of potassic (K) and phosphatic (P) fertilizers, but still having a lever of control through a system of fixed subsidy, the government hopes to keep the relative prices of these nutrients low as compared to urea. This will lead to farmers using more P, K and micro-nutrient based fertilizers, policy makers feel. It is true that our farmlands need a more balanced and discerning use of fertilizers, but I am not sure whether this policy would be able to achieve that, said Devinder Sharma, a food policy analyst. For one, farmers do not know how much P and K need to be used. Secondly, the infrastructure for soil testing, which is essential if the right amounts of fertilizers are to be used, is abysmal. The government needs to invest in these areas as well. D K Joshi, principal economist with Crisil, agrees. The impact of the new policy would be more immediate in reining in the governments subsidy bill. Redressing the nutrient imbalance in soil will require time and more policy measures. Rakesh Tikait, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, fears that fertilizer decontrol will lead to a hike in prices. While the government has said it would intervene if prices of fertilizers rise, in effect the market will rule prices. When the government has failed in checking price-rise of every other item, how can it control fertilizer prices? Tikait said a much better method of farm subsidy would be to give money directly to farmers. At the moment, the government subsidy for every acre of farmland is to the tune of Rs 3,800. Why cant this money be directly given to farmers? Let them then buy fertilizers at market rates. The current subsidy regime promotes black-marketing, he added. Other experts felt the governments decision to raise urea price by 10% and give fixed subsidy for other fertilizers would boost the industry and help raise fertilizer production. Said Ramesh Chand, national professor at National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, said: Urea prices were frozen for seven years. The hike was overdue given the healthy rise in the minimum support price during this period. If you account for inflation, the real price of urea would still be lower than last year. Fixed subsidy regime would help fertilizer industry raise production and innovate. While agreeing that the policy will encourage the fertilizer industry to introduce innovative products, Sudip Sural, head of corporate ratings at Crisil who looks after the fertilizer sector, had a word of caution. We also believe that the decontrol policy will also result in higher volatility in the profitability of players in the industry. Operating efficiencies, therefore, will assume critical importance for complex fertilizer players, he said. |