Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11796, 'title' => 'Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /> <br /> These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /> <br /> All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /> <br /> At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /> <br /> At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /> <br /> It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /> <br /> The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /> <br /> The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /> <br /> The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /> <br /> As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Few-details--huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-Bill/886167/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11914, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11796, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security,food security bill,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />&ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11796, 'title' => 'Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /> <br /> These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /> <br /> All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /> <br /> At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /> <br /> At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /> <br /> It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /> <br /> The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /> <br /> The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /> <br /> The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /> <br /> As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Few-details--huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-Bill/886167/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11914, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11796 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security,food security bill,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />&ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is “at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions”. The Food Ministry’s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts — two by the Law Ministry and one by Food — does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has “yet not quantified” the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while “no other department has projected cost estimates”, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />“Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,” the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to “all tribals and forest dwellers” irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for “morning snack” as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that “will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage”.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11796, 'title' => 'Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /> <br /> These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /> <br /> All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /> <br /> At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /> <br /> At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /> <br /> It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /> <br /> The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /> <br /> The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /> <br /> The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /> <br /> As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Few-details--huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-Bill/886167/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11914, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11796, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security,food security bill,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />&ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11796, 'title' => 'Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /> <br /> These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /> <br /> All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /> <br /> At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /> <br /> At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /> <br /> It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /> <br /> The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /> <br /> The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /> <br /> The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /> <br /> As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Few-details--huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-Bill/886167/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11914, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11796 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security,food security bill,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />&ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is “at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions”. The Food Ministry’s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts — two by the Law Ministry and one by Food — does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has “yet not quantified” the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while “no other department has projected cost estimates”, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />“Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,” the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to “all tribals and forest dwellers” irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for “morning snack” as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that “will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage”.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6536a4e734-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11796, 'title' => 'Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /> <br /> These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /> <br /> All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /> <br /> At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /> <br /> At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /> <br /> It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /> <br /> The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /> <br /> The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /> <br /> The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /> <br /> As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Few-details--huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-Bill/886167/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11914, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11796, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security,food security bill,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />&ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11796, 'title' => 'Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /> <br /> These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /> <br /> All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /> <br /> At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /> <br /> At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /> <br /> It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /> <br /> The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /> <br /> The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /> <br /> The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /> <br /> As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Few-details--huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-Bill/886167/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11914, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11796 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security,food security bill,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government&rsquo;s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is &ldquo;at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions&rdquo;. The Food Ministry&rsquo;s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts &mdash; two by the Law Ministry and one by Food &mdash; does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has &ldquo;yet not quantified&rdquo; the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while &ldquo;no other department has projected cost estimates&rdquo;, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />&ldquo;Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,&rdquo; the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to &ldquo;all tribals and forest dwellers&rdquo; irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for &ldquo;morning snack&rdquo; as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that &ldquo;will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage&rdquo;.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is “at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions”. The Food Ministry’s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts — two by the Law Ministry and one by Food — does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has “yet not quantified” the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while “no other department has projected cost estimates”, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />“Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,” the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to “all tribals and forest dwellers” irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for “morning snack” as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that “will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage”.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11796, 'title' => 'Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /> <br /> These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is “at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions”. The Food Ministry’s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /> <br /> All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /> <br /> At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /> <br /> At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts — two by the Law Ministry and one by Food — does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /> <br /> It says it has “yet not quantified” the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /> <br /> The note apprises the Cabinet that while “no other department has projected cost estimates”, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /> <br /> “Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,” the Food Ministry note says.<br /> <br /> The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /> <br /> The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to “all tribals and forest dwellers” irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for “morning snack” as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /> <br /> As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that “will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage”. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Few-details--huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-Bill/886167/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11914, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11796, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security,food security bill,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is “at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions”. The Food Ministry’s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts — two by the Law Ministry and one by Food — does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has “yet not quantified” the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while “no other department has projected cost estimates”, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />“Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,” the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to “all tribals and forest dwellers” irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for “morning snack” as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that “will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage”.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11796, 'title' => 'Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /> <br /> These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is “at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions”. The Food Ministry’s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /> <br /> All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /> <br /> At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /> <br /> At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts — two by the Law Ministry and one by Food — does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /> <br /> It says it has “yet not quantified” the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /> <br /> The note apprises the Cabinet that while “no other department has projected cost estimates”, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /> <br /> “Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,” the Food Ministry note says.<br /> <br /> The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /> <br /> The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to “all tribals and forest dwellers” irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for “morning snack” as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /> <br /> As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that “will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage”. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Few-details--huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-Bill/886167/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'few-details-huge-subsidy-in-3-versions-of-food-bill-by-ravish-tiwari-11914', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11914, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11796 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security,food security bill,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.<br /><br />These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is “at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions”. The Food Ministry’s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials.<br /><br />All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels.<br /><br />At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario.<br /><br />At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts — two by the Law Ministry and one by Food — does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries.<br /><br />It says it has “yet not quantified” the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others.<br /><br />The note apprises the Cabinet that while “no other department has projected cost estimates”, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them.<br /><br />“Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,” the Food Ministry note says.<br /><br />The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others.<br /><br />The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to “all tribals and forest dwellers” irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for “morning snack” as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years.<br /><br />As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that “will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage”.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Few details, huge subsidy in 3 versions of food Bill by Ravish Tiwari |
Over two and a half years after President Pratibha Patil announced the government’s plan to enact a food security law, the Union Cabinet on Tuesday is slated to consider three separate versions of the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) for introduction in the current session of Parliament.
These three versions arise out of differences between the Food Ministry and the Law Ministry over the issue of grievance redressal mechanism. The Legislative Department has said that the mechanism provided in the NFSB is “at variance with the established legislative practice about separation of powers between executive/regulatory functions and adjucatory functions”. The Food Ministry’s Bill allows state food commissions and central panels to hear appeals pertaining to decisions of district grievance redressal officials. All three versions, however, are unified in seeking to legally bind the Centre to provisions that seek to hike up the food subsidy bill of the government by over 40 per cent from the current levels. At the first count, the Food Ministry has estimated that the provisions of the NFSB would entail about Rs 94,973 crore of annual food subsidy, up from over Rs 67,310 crore in the current scenario. At the same time, the Cabinet note containing the three drafts — two by the Law Ministry and one by Food — does not clarify a host of issues such as the resultant additional expenditure by different departments at the Centre, sharing of the expenditure with states, and the methodology for identification of beneficiaries. It says it has “yet not quantified” the additional investments required in increasing storage capacity or for PDS reforms including computerisation, for augmenting the transportation and distribution network, and for enhancing the capacity to run allied schemes sich as maternity benefits, meals to vulenrable sections among others. The note apprises the Cabinet that while “no other department has projected cost estimates”, the departments of Agriculture and Women and Child Development have indicated over Rs 1.45 lakh crore investment between them. “Such expenditures should be projected in the plan/budget estimates of concerned ministries and met therefrom,” the Food Ministry note says. The proposal reminds the Cabinet that there would about Rs 32,192 crore of annual recurring expenditure to run schemes such as meals to vulenrable sections, maternity benefits, a grievance redressal mechanism, and transportation among others. The proposal also seeks clearance of the Cabinet demand to provide highly subsidised foodgrains to “all tribals and forest dwellers” irrespective of the eligibility criteria, making provision for “morning snack” as legal entitlement to children in the age group three-six years. As for identification of the beneficiaries, all that the Food Ministry has submitted to the Cabinet is that a methodology will be worked out in such a manner that “will seek to ensure that no poor or deprived household will be excluded from coverage”. |