Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fixing-mgnrega-4674205/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fixing-mgnrega-4674205/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fixing-mgnrega-4674205/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fixing-mgnrega-4674205/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Financial Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Financial Express, 14 October, 2014, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/editorial-fixing-mgnrega/1298216&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fixing-mgnrega-4674205&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674205,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Productive Assets,Wages,mgnrega,NREGA,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Financial Express


What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Financial Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Financial Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Financial Express, 14 October, 2014, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/editorial-fixing-mgnrega/1298216&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fixing-mgnrega-4674205&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674205,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26167
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Productive Assets,Wages,mgnrega,NREGA,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Financial Express


What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Financial Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fixing-mgnrega-4674205.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Financial Express


What's clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Fixing MGNREGA</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><em>What's clear is it has helped few in its current form</em></p><p align="justify">Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.</p><p align="justify">At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn't really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don't even cover subsistence for a family of five.</p><p align="justify">Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn't working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn't make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Financial Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Financial Express, 14 October, 2014, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/editorial-fixing-mgnrega/1298216&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fixing-mgnrega-4674205&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674205,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Productive Assets,Wages,mgnrega,NREGA,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Financial Express


What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Financial Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Financial Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Financial Express, 14 October, 2014, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/editorial-fixing-mgnrega/1298216&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fixing-mgnrega-4674205&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674205,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26167
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Productive Assets,Wages,mgnrega,NREGA,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Financial Express


What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Financial Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fixing-mgnrega-4674205.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Financial Express


What's clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Fixing MGNREGA</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><em>What's clear is it has helped few in its current form</em></p><p align="justify">Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.</p><p align="justify">At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn't really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don't even cover subsistence for a family of five.</p><p align="justify">Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn't working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn't make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f362cdca71c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Financial Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Financial Express, 14 October, 2014, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/editorial-fixing-mgnrega/1298216&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fixing-mgnrega-4674205&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674205,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Productive Assets,Wages,mgnrega,NREGA,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Financial Express


What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Financial Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26167,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Fixing MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Financial Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Financial Express, 14 October, 2014, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/editorial-fixing-mgnrega/1298216&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fixing-mgnrega-4674205&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674205,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26167
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Productive Assets,Wages,mgnrega,NREGA,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Financial Express


What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Financial Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What&#039;s clear is it has helped few in its current form&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn&#039;t really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don&#039;t even cover subsistence for a family of five.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn&#039;t working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn&#039;t make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fixing-mgnrega-4674205.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Financial Express


What's clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Fixing MGNREGA</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><em>What's clear is it has helped few in its current form</em></p><p align="justify">Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.</p><p align="justify">At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn't really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don't even cover subsistence for a family of five.</p><p align="justify">Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn't working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn't make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 26167,
		'title' => 'Fixing MGNREGA',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Financial Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<em>What's clear is it has helped few in its current form</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.
</p>
<p align="justify">
At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn't really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don't even cover subsistence for a family of five.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn't working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn't make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. 
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 14 October, 2014, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/editorial-fixing-mgnrega/1298216',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'fixing-mgnrega-4674205',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4674205,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 26167,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Productive Assets,Wages,mgnrega,NREGA,Employment',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Financial Express


What's clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><em>What's clear is it has helped few in its current form</em></p><p align="justify">Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.</p><p align="justify">At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn't really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don't even cover subsistence for a family of five.</p><p align="justify">Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn't working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn't make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. </p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 26167,
	'title' => 'Fixing MGNREGA',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Financial Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
<em>What's clear is it has helped few in its current form</em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.
</p>
<p align="justify">
At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn't really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don't even cover subsistence for a family of five.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn't working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn't make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. 
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Financial Express, 14 October, 2014, http://www.financialexpress.com/news/editorial-fixing-mgnrega/1298216',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'fixing-mgnrega-4674205',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4674205,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 26167
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fixing MGNREGA'
$metaKeywords = 'Productive Assets,Wages,mgnrega,NREGA,Employment'
$metaDesc = '
-The Financial Express


What's clear is it has helped few in its current form


Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Financial Express</div><p align="justify"><em>What's clear is it has helped few in its current form</em></p><p align="justify">Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it.</p><p align="justify">At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn't really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don't even cover subsistence for a family of five.</p><p align="justify">Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn't working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn't make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Fixing MGNREGA

-The Financial Express What's clear is it has helped few in its current form Activists have come down heavily on rural development minister Nitin Gadkari for attempting to restructure the MGNREGA by, among others, changing the mandatory amount reserved for labour; the number of districts that the scheme is to be used for is also to be reduced to just the needy ones. This has been done, the activists argue, to help the contractor mafia and will reduce the amount of jobs available for the poor. Gadkari, in turn, has responded by arguing that the scheme has become a source of corruption and that no productive assets are being created through it. At the outset, it has to be recognised MGNREGA, in its current form, has hardly benefitted anyone. Just around 4% of all households registered under it have been provided the mandatory 100 days of work in a year. As a result, since it has created just around 1-2% of all jobs in the country, it doesn't really provide any meaningful help in alleviating poverty. Even for those who get what MGNREGA promises, at R140 a day, the wages don't even cover subsistence for a family of five. Gadkari is, no doubt, wrong when he talks of how no productive assets were created out of MGNREGA since providing this was never its main aim; the scheme was positioned as unemployment dole. Where Gadkari is right, though, is that the scheme simply isn't working. The minister is also right in wanting to stress on creating more irrigation facilities since it is these, along with rural roads, that really lead to the sharpest reduction in rural poverty. But what he also needs to keep in mind is that, over the past decades, India has had several wage-linked asset creation schemes, and few, if any, have worked. One solution is to simply merge MGNREGA with other government subsidies that are to be delivered to the poor through direct benefit transfers (DBT). The other, which Gadkari is attempting, is to create more rural infrastructure. This will certainly benefit more people than MGNREGA has, but it is a lot more difficult to deliver on. That doesn't make it any less worthwhile to try, but this needs to be kept in mind. Also, if rural infrastructure is to be created, the funds available under MGNREGA are hardly near enough. The scheme needs to be merged, either with DBT or some other rural infrastructure one.