Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 12 November, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/FM-s-reform-push-resisted-from-within/Article1-958200.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 18067,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Economic Reforms,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 12 November, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/FM-s-reform-push-resisted-from-within/Article1-958200.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 18067,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17938
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Economic Reforms,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &mdash; sought for more.<br /><br />The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.<br /><br />However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.<br /><br />If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.<br /><br />Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.<br /><br />The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.<br /><br />&quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 12 November, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/FM-s-reform-push-resisted-from-within/Article1-958200.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 18067,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Economic Reforms,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 12 November, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/FM-s-reform-push-resisted-from-within/Article1-958200.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 18067,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17938
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Economic Reforms,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &mdash; sought for more.<br /><br />The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.<br /><br />However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.<br /><br />If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.<br /><br />Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.<br /><br />The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.<br /><br />&quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810d96f28fe9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 12 November, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/FM-s-reform-push-resisted-from-within/Article1-958200.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 18067,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Economic Reforms,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17938,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 12 November, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/FM-s-reform-push-resisted-from-within/Article1-958200.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 18067,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17938
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&amp;#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Economic Reforms,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance minister P Chidambaram&amp;rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&amp;rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &amp;mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &amp;mdash; sought for more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&amp;rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&amp;quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &mdash; sought for more.<br /><br />The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.<br /><br />However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.<br /><br />If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.<br /><br />Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.<br /><br />The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.<br /><br />&quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 17938,
		'title' => 'FM's reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindustan Times<br />
<br />
Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &mdash; sought for more.<br />
<br />
The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.<br />
<br />
However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.<br />
<br />
If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.<br />
<br />
Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.<br />
<br />
The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.<br />
<br />
&quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 12 November, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/FM-s-reform-push-resisted-from-within/Article1-958200.aspx',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 18067,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 17938,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Economic Reforms,Governance',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &mdash; sought for more.<br /><br />The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.<br /><br />However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.<br /><br />If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.<br /><br />Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.<br /><br />The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.<br /><br />&quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 17938,
	'title' => 'FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindustan Times<br />
<br />
Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &mdash; sought for more.<br />
<br />
The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.<br />
<br />
However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.<br />
<br />
If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.<br />
<br />
Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.<br />
<br />
The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.<br />
<br />
&quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 12 November, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/FM-s-reform-push-resisted-from-within/Article1-958200.aspx',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'fm039s-reform-push-resisted-from-within-chetan-chauhan-18067',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 18067,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 17938
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | FM&#039;s reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan'
$metaKeywords = 'Economic Reforms,Governance'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindustan Times

Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />Finance minister P Chidambaram&rsquo;s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet&rsquo;s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram &mdash; in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh &mdash; sought for more.<br /><br />The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted.<br /><br />However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes.<br /><br />If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,&rdquo; the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet.<br /><br />Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds.<br /><br />The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements.<br /><br />&quot;Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall,&quot; a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

FM's reform push resisted from within -Chetan Chauhan

-The Hindustan Times Finance minister P Chidambaram’s grand plan to redefine how the Centre spends its funds through state governments is facing stiff opposition from within, pushing the Planning Commission to seek the cabinet’s views on the proposal. The Centre disburses billions of rupees to states for achieving national developmental goals, but its effective use remains an area of concern. Though the Planning Commission had suggested reforms, Chidambaram — in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh — sought for more. The finance minister wants the administration of over 100 central schemes with annual outlay of less than Rs. 300 crore to be transferred to the state governments, so the Centre can concentrate on 17 big-ticket flagship schemes. He also said that no new scheme in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) of less than Rs. 500 crore should be permitted. However, the plan panel estimates that his proposal would leave 17 central departments with no central scheme to administer, raising questions on the future of the bureaucracy linked with these schemes. If the schemes are transferred, many bureaucratic positions in these ministries would have to be dissolved as the central government would be implementing only 73 programmes. “The implementation of this recommendation will face operational difficulties,” the plan panel had said in a note circulated for the consideration of the Union cabinet. Chidambaram had also proposed a new norm of minimum 25% share in funding for general category states, and 10% for special category states, to utilise central funds. The proposal is contentious because the Centre, on an average, shared 80% of the funds for flagship schemes, worth Rs. 6,60,000 crore, in the 11th Plan (2007-12). In the case of Right To Education, the government had agreed to pay 90% of the funding requirements. "Any change will be resisted by the state governments and even the ministries, whose budgets would fall," a senior plan panel official said, adding that the cabinet has been asked for its view.