Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22081, 'title' => 'Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. </p> <p align="justify"> Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. </p> <p align="justify"> The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. </p> <p align="justify"> The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. </p> <p align="justify"> It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. </p> <p align="justify"> It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. </p> <p align="justify"> Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 6 August, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff/1151616/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22230, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22081, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security Ordinance,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Political Parties', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22081, 'title' => 'Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. </p> <p align="justify"> Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. </p> <p align="justify"> The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. </p> <p align="justify"> The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. </p> <p align="justify"> It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. </p> <p align="justify"> It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. </p> <p align="justify"> Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 6 August, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff/1151616/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22230, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22081 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security Ordinance,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Political Parties' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22081, 'title' => 'Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. </p> <p align="justify"> Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. </p> <p align="justify"> The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. </p> <p align="justify"> The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. </p> <p align="justify"> It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. </p> <p align="justify"> It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. </p> <p align="justify"> Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 6 August, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff/1151616/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22230, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22081, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security Ordinance,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Political Parties', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22081, 'title' => 'Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. </p> <p align="justify"> Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. </p> <p align="justify"> The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. </p> <p align="justify"> The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. </p> <p align="justify"> It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. </p> <p align="justify"> It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. </p> <p align="justify"> Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 6 August, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff/1151616/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22230, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22081 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security Ordinance,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Political Parties' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6814b8311edb3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22081, 'title' => 'Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. </p> <p align="justify"> Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. </p> <p align="justify"> The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. </p> <p align="justify"> The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. </p> <p align="justify"> It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. </p> <p align="justify"> It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. </p> <p align="justify"> Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 6 August, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff/1151616/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22230, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22081, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security Ordinance,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Political Parties', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22081, 'title' => 'Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. </p> <p align="justify"> Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. </p> <p align="justify"> The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. </p> <p align="justify"> The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. </p> <p align="justify"> It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. </p> <p align="justify"> It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. </p> <p align="justify"> Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 6 August, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff/1151616/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22230, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22081 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security Ordinance,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Political Parties' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22081, 'title' => 'Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. </p> <p align="justify"> Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. </p> <p align="justify"> The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. </p> <p align="justify"> The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. </p> <p align="justify"> It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. </p> <p align="justify"> It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. </p> <p align="justify"> Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 6 August, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff/1151616/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22230, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22081, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security Ordinance,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Political Parties', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22081, 'title' => 'Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. </p> <p align="justify"> Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. </p> <p align="justify"> The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. </p> <p align="justify"> The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. </p> <p align="justify"> It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. </p> <p align="justify"> It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. </p> <p align="justify"> Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. </p> <p align="justify"> Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 6 August, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff/1151616/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-bill-separating-wheat-from-chaff-ravish-tiwari-22230', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22230, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22081 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security Ordinance,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Political Parties' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them. Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />As the Parliament session begins, it would be interesting to see how the food Bill debate pans out and what the stands parties take say about them.</p><p align="justify">Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else.</p><p align="justify">The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees.</p><p align="justify">The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so.</p><p align="justify">The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents.</p><p align="justify">It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing.</p><p align="justify">It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers.</p><p align="justify">Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost.</p><p align="justify">Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi </em></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Food security Bill: Separating wheat from chaff -Ravish Tiwari |
-The Indian Express
Both the main ideological opponents of the ruling Congress - the BJP and Left - have sounded a discordant note. However, their objections are more perfunctory in nature than anything else. The Left, which had so vehemently pushed the job scheme MNREGS as part of the first UPA government, realises the populism potential of the Bill being pushed by the Congress and so its demand is more generous food guarantees. The BJP's objections are even more flimsy. It has demanded replication of the party's Chhattisgarh food security legislation at the national level without explaining why its other state governments have not done so. The objections of both the fronts are not on the ground that the food Bill is bad in law. Their objection is that there could be a better and more generous provision, which is no argument at all. It smacks either of a lack of conviction or lack of a rival intellectual argument on part of the Congress's opponents. It also allows these parties to perch themselves conveniently at the fence, an eye out to see which way the wind is blowing. It's the Samajwadi Party that is alone in sticking its neck out and calling the food Bill a bad move. The party contends that the benefits of cheap distribution of grains to two-thirds of the population would not be able to compensate for the adverse impact on local grain markets, hitting farmers. Coming from a food-surplus state and deriving his core political support from the grain-producing farming community, Mulayam Singh Yadav has so far decided to put them foremost. Knowing Mulayam's flip-flops in Parliament in recent years, it is anybody's guess how long his party will persist with its opposition, but the SP's stance should be enough to spur leaders or parties with stakes in food-surplus states, such as Punjab, Haryana, Bihar and West Bengal, to put the spotlight away from grain distribution - as promised by the Congress -to the agrarian economy that is so crucial if this virtually universal food guarantee is to work. And it's time this debate took this into view. Ravish is a senior assistant editor based in Delhi |