Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8998, 'title' => 'Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /> <br /> Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /> <br /> The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /> <br /> As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /> <br /> Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /> <br /> The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Food-security--SC-punches-holes-in-Plan-panel-figures/821153/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9102, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8998, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />&ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />&ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8998, 'title' => 'Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /> <br /> Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /> <br /> The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /> <br /> As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /> <br /> Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /> <br /> The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Food-security--SC-punches-holes-in-Plan-panel-figures/821153/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9102, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8998 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />&ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />&ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government’s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission’s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is “totally inadequate”.<br /><br />“Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?” the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />“According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,” the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government’s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />“A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,” the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8998, 'title' => 'Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /> <br /> Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /> <br /> The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /> <br /> As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /> <br /> Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /> <br /> The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Food-security--SC-punches-holes-in-Plan-panel-figures/821153/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9102, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8998, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />&ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />&ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8998, 'title' => 'Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /> <br /> Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /> <br /> The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /> <br /> As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /> <br /> Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /> <br /> The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Food-security--SC-punches-holes-in-Plan-panel-figures/821153/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9102, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8998 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />&ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />&ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government’s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission’s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is “totally inadequate”.<br /><br />“Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?” the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />“According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,” the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government’s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />“A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,” the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e076c009fb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e076c009fb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8998, 'title' => 'Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /> <br /> Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /> <br /> The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /> <br /> As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /> <br /> Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /> <br /> The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Food-security--SC-punches-holes-in-Plan-panel-figures/821153/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9102, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8998, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />&ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />&ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8998, 'title' => 'Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /> <br /> Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /> <br /> The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /> <br /> As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /> <br /> Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /> <br /> The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Food-security--SC-punches-holes-in-Plan-panel-figures/821153/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9102, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8998 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government&rsquo;s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission&rsquo;s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is &ldquo;totally inadequate&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?&rdquo; the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />&ldquo;According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,&rdquo; the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government&rsquo;s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />&ldquo;A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,&rdquo; the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government’s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission’s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is “totally inadequate”.<br /><br />“Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?” the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />“According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,” the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government’s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />“A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,” the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8998, 'title' => 'Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> </div> <div align="justify"> Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government’s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /> <br /> Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission’s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is “totally inadequate”.<br /> <br /> “Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?” the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /> <br /> The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /> <br /> As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /> <br /> “According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,” the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /> <br /> Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government’s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /> <br /> “A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,” the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /> <br /> The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Food-security--SC-punches-holes-in-Plan-panel-figures/821153/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9102, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8998, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government’s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission’s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is “totally inadequate”.<br /><br />“Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?” the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />“According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,” the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government’s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />“A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,” the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8998, 'title' => 'Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> </div> <div align="justify"> Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government’s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /> <br /> Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission’s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is “totally inadequate”.<br /> <br /> “Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?” the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /> <br /> The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /> <br /> As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /> <br /> “According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,” the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /> <br /> Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government’s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /> <br /> “A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,” the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /> <br /> The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 July, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Food-security--SC-punches-holes-in-Plan-panel-figures/821153/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'food-security-sc-punches-holes-in-plan-panel-figures-9102', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9102, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8998 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify">Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government’s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.<br /><br />Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission’s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is “totally inadequate”.<br /><br />“Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?” the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel.<br /><br />The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates.<br /><br />As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas.<br /><br />“According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,” the court had told the Commission in the last hearing.<br /><br />Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government’s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line.<br /><br />“A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,” the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country.<br /><br />The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Food security: SC punches holes in Plan panel figures |
-The Indian Express Any common man with a little common sense can understand that a person cannot afford to consume 2,400 calories on an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 per day, the Supreme Court said on Friday, raising doubts about the government’s norms for providing food security to vulnerable sections like the Below Poverty Line (BPL) population.
Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma said the Planning Commission’s calculation that a person earning a per capita of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas of the country can afford 2,400 calories of food a day is “totally inadequate”. “Nobody can consume 2400 calories with an average income of Rs 20 or Rs 10 anywhere in the country. Why do you press on with this when the data is very simple and any common man with a little common sense can understand our point?” the bench asked the Planning Commission counsel. The court had in the previous hearing in May asked the Planning Commission to revise the per capita norms to determine BPL as per the price index of May 2011 or subsequent dates. As per the Commission, the yardstick for including a person in the BPL category is if she or he earns an income less than Rs 20 per day in urban areas and Rs 10 in rural areas. “According to the Tendulkar Committee, with the price level of 2011, it is impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories on Rs 20 and an individual in a rural area to consume 2,400 calories on Rs 10,” the court had told the Commission in the last hearing. Noting that food security is not black and white, the court had also wondered about the government’s plans to provide food security for a section of the population who are only marginally above the BPL line. “A large section of the population which has marginally higher income than Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 15 in rural areas also deserves food at subsidised rates,” the court had said, citing the reports of the court-appointed Justice DP Wadhwa Committee looking into the issue of streamlining public distribution system in the country. The judges wanted the Centre to distribute foodgrains on the basis of the number of individual members in a family. Meanwhile, the court directed the chief secretaries of all states to ensure that foodgrains were lifted in time. The court scheduled the case for August 18 for further hearing on the latest report filed by the Justice Wadhwa panel. |