Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4055, 'title' => 'Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Tribune, 31 October, 2010, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101101/himachal.htm#2', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4145, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4055, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4055, 'title' => 'Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Tribune, 31 October, 2010, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101101/himachal.htm#2', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4145, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4055 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of ‘nautor’ lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, ‘nistar’ jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4055, 'title' => 'Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Tribune, 31 October, 2010, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101101/himachal.htm#2', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4145, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4055, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4055, 'title' => 'Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Tribune, 31 October, 2010, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101101/himachal.htm#2', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4145, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4055 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of ‘nautor’ lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, ‘nistar’ jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68279cb53c800-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68279cb53c800-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4055, 'title' => 'Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Tribune, 31 October, 2010, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101101/himachal.htm#2', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4145, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4055, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4055, 'title' => 'Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Tribune, 31 October, 2010, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101101/himachal.htm#2', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4145, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4055 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of &lsquo;nautor&rsquo; lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, &lsquo;nistar&rsquo; jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of ‘nautor’ lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, ‘nistar’ jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4055, 'title' => 'Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the issue of ‘nautor’ lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, ‘nistar’ jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Tribune, 31 October, 2010, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101101/himachal.htm#2', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4145, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4055, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of ‘nautor’ lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, ‘nistar’ jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4055, 'title' => 'Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the issue of ‘nautor’ lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, ‘nistar’ jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Tribune, 31 October, 2010, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101101/himachal.htm#2', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'forest-act-implementation-poor-in-state-report-by-rakesh-lohumi-4145', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4145, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4055 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas. It...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully.</font><br /><br /><font >Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report.</font><br /><br /><font >More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas.</font><br /><br /><font >On the issue of ‘nautor’ lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA.</font><br /><br /><font >Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act.</font><br /><br /><font >The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, ‘nistar’ jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA.</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Forest Act implementation poor in state: Report by Rakesh Lohumi |
The joint committee on the Forest Rights Act (FRA) has termed the implementation of the Act in the state as extremely poor and recommended that it should be enforced in the state and not confined only to the tribal areas.
It is of the firm view that there should be no diversion of forest land till the FRA is enforced fully. Disagreeing with the general perception on the part of the government that given the specific geographical condition it cannot be implemented in the whole of the state, it has asserted that 70 per cent population is eligible for benefits under the FRA by virtue of being dependent on forests for survival and livelihood needs. The government should issue the necessary orders for the implementation of the Act in the state with immediate effect to ensure that forest-dependent population is not denied its legitimate forest rights, the committee which visited the state recently for the purpose has stated in its report. More importantly, it has recommended that an effective mechanism should be put in place to ensure that there is no diversion of forest land until the FRA is fully implemented. Proceedings in the high court and other courts or any authority orders regarding eviction of that occupying forest land should be put on hold. These orders were issued under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Conservation Act which had been superseded by the FRA. The state government should promptly take a decision on the claims that have been received in the tribal areas and the criteria laid down regarding the eligibility of the beneficiaries should be withdrawn as it is a direct contravention of the provisions of the FRA and also delaying the process of recognition of forest rights in the tribal areas. On the issue of ‘nautor’ lands, the FRA could be considered in case of poor families settled in forest land up to 20 bighas. It should be ensured that each village filed community claims as per the revenue records and any new use of forest resources. In case of failure to do so, the government should recognise the rights enlisted in the revenue records as the community rights under the FRA. Special focus has to be laid on the filing of claims by groups of migratory graziers for which an inventory should be created, based on the data available with the forest department. The new timber distribution policy is against the spirit of the FRA and these rights should be now made a part of new Act. The Forest Act 1927 should not be confused with land reform as it was passed by the British to annex Indian forests. The rights of locals were restricted and reduced to privileges and later on completely extinguished. After Independence more and more acquisition of gram sabha land, village forest, ‘nistar’ jungles and common property resources were acquired under the IFA. |