Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 14 May, 2016, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn-t-respect-tribals-jairam-116051400242_1.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679345,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest Dwellers,Forests,forest rights act,fra,Tribal Rights,Tribal Welfare,Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 14 May, 2016, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn-t-respect-tribals-jairam-116051400242_1.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679345,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 31277
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Forest Dwellers,Forests,forest rights act,fra,Tribal Rights,Tribal Welfare,Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy<br /></em><br />On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.<br /><br />The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&rsquo; and forest dwellers&rsquo;&nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.<br /><br />On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government's inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&rdquo;<br /><br />He added, &ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected.&rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 14 May, 2016, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn-t-respect-tribals-jairam-116051400242_1.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679345,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest Dwellers,Forests,forest rights act,fra,Tribal Rights,Tribal Welfare,Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 14 May, 2016, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn-t-respect-tribals-jairam-116051400242_1.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679345,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 31277
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Forest Dwellers,Forests,forest rights act,fra,Tribal Rights,Tribal Welfare,Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy<br /></em><br />On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.<br /><br />The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&rsquo; and forest dwellers&rsquo;&nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.<br /><br />On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government's inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&rdquo;<br /><br />He added, &ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected.&rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f2b3a8bb10d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 14 May, 2016, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn-t-respect-tribals-jairam-116051400242_1.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679345,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest Dwellers,Forests,forest rights act,fra,Tribal Rights,Tribal Welfare,Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31277,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 14 May, 2016, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn-t-respect-tribals-jairam-116051400242_1.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679345,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 31277
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&amp;#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Forest Dwellers,Forests,forest rights act,fra,Tribal Rights,Tribal Welfare,Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&amp;rsquo; and forest dwellers&amp;rsquo;&amp;nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &amp;ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government&#039;s inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added, &amp;ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country&#039;s poorest people are protected.&amp;rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&amp;rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy<br /></em><br />On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.<br /><br />The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&rsquo; and forest dwellers&rsquo;&nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.<br /><br />On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government's inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&rdquo;<br /><br />He added, &ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected.&rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 31277,
		'title' => 'Forest fund Bill failed as it didn't respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Business Standard<br />
<br />
<em>Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy<br />
</em><br />
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.<br />
<br />
The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&rsquo; and forest dwellers&rsquo;&nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.<br />
<br />
On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government's inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
He added, &ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected.&rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 14 May, 2016, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn-t-respect-tribals-jairam-116051400242_1.html',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4679345,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 31277,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Forest Dwellers,Forests,forest rights act,fra,Tribal Rights,Tribal Welfare,Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill',
	'metaDesc' => '
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy<br /></em><br />On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.<br /><br />The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&rsquo; and forest dwellers&rsquo;&nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.<br /><br />On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government's inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&rdquo;<br /><br />He added, &ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected.&rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 31277,
	'title' => 'Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Business Standard<br />
<br />
<em>Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy<br />
</em><br />
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.<br />
<br />
The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&rsquo; and forest dwellers&rsquo;&nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.<br />
<br />
On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government's inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
He added, &ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected.&rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 14 May, 2016, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn-t-respect-tribals-jairam-116051400242_1.html',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'forest-fund-bill-failed-as-it-didn039t-respect-tribals-jairam-nitin-sethi-4679345',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4679345,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 31277
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Forest fund Bill failed as it didn&#039;t respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi'
$metaKeywords = 'Forest Dwellers,Forests,forest rights act,fra,Tribal Rights,Tribal Welfare,Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill'
$metaDesc = '
-Business Standard

Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy

On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy<br /></em><br />On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy.<br /><br />The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals&rsquo; and forest dwellers&rsquo;&nbsp; lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry.<br /><br />On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, &ldquo;The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government's inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.&rdquo;<br /><br />He added, &ldquo;This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected.&rdquo; On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA&rsquo;s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Forest fund Bill failed as it didn't respect tribals: Jairam -Nitin Sethi

-Business Standard Claims Bill did not respect rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi regretted that the Compensatory Afforestation (CA) Bill could not be passed in the budget session of Parliament. On Saturday, outgoing Rajya Sabha member from Congress Jairam Ramesh hit back at the NDA, saying the reason the bill could not be cleared was that it did not respect the rights of people under the Forest Rights Act and gave unbridled control over thousands of crores to forest bureaucracy. The CA bill intends to send a large part of the funds collected from industry back to the state governments. Such a fund was created out of Supreme Court orders and has so far accumulated nearly Rs 40,000 crore, but has been lying unutilised with the Centre. Each year, it generates more than a couple of thousand crore as industries get greater access to chop down forest land. But the bill was stuck in the Rajya Sabha this session when the Congress, CPM, JD(U) and the TMC came together giving notice for amendments. They sought that plantation work by forest departments on tribals’ and forest dwellers’  lands should be done only with their prior informed consent, as required under the Forest Rights Act. The NDA government has over the past two years tried repeatedly to dilute the consent powers of tribals under the FRA through executive orders but has failed in the face of unrelenting opposition from the tribal affairs ministry. On Saturday Ramesh shot off a note to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who had piloted the bill. He said, “The Prime Minister failed to mention that the reason this bill could not be passed was his own government's inexplicable decision to not include any provisions in the bill for respecting the rights of forest dwellers bestowed by the Forest Rights Act, 2006, when engaging in afforestation projects.” He added, “This shows clearly that the government does not intend to respect forest rights, as is apparent from its moves to lease forest lands to private companies and similar steps. It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused, and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected.” On Friday Prime Minister Modi had pitched it as a stymied attempt of the NDA government to provide thousands of crores back to states to use for their forestry efforts, a step that many states have long demanded. The NDA, unwilling to bring in the consent powers of tribals and other forest dwellers into the CA Bill and mindful of lacking numbers in the Rajya Sabha, decided to defer the bill to the monsoon session, hoping to pitch it in the interim as a bill that would only aid state governments, whether ruled by the NDA or other parties. But the Congress and the Left have assessed the bill to be in line with NDA’s already proclaimed policy of letting industry and private entities get into afforestation as a business, a move that all previous governments, regardless of political hue, have rejected. Such proposals were previously mooted in the UPA but held back with concerns raised over the impact on the millions of tribals and others who have direct rights in forests and indirect dependence on the green cover.