Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arguments will continue on February 24.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 18 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/18/stories/2011021864131100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6140,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arguments will continue on February 24.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arguments will continue on February 24.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 18 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/18/stories/2011021864131100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6140,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6046
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arguments will continue on February 24.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.<br /><br />A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.<br /><br />Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners' fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &mdash; right to profession.<br /><br />The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.<br /><br />When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&rdquo;<br /><br />When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&rdquo;<br /><br />The &lsquo;Right to life' had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&rdquo; the CJI said.<br /><br />Justice Kapadia further said: &ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Cannot interfere'<br /></em><br />Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.<br /><br /><em>Only a regulation<br /></em><br />Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Arguments will continue on February 24.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arguments will continue on February 24.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 18 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/18/stories/2011021864131100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6140,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arguments will continue on February 24.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arguments will continue on February 24.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 18 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/18/stories/2011021864131100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6140,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6046
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arguments will continue on February 24.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.<br /><br />A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.<br /><br />Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners' fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &mdash; right to profession.<br /><br />The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.<br /><br />When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&rdquo;<br /><br />When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&rdquo;<br /><br />The &lsquo;Right to life' had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&rdquo; the CJI said.<br /><br />Justice Kapadia further said: &ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Cannot interfere'<br /></em><br />Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.<br /><br /><em>Only a regulation<br /></em><br />Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Arguments will continue on February 24.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6816d27fcf97e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arguments will continue on February 24.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 18 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/18/stories/2011021864131100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6140,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arguments will continue on February 24.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6046,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arguments will continue on February 24.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 18 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/18/stories/2011021864131100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6140,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6046
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &amp;ldquo;right to life&#039; under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners&#039; fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &amp;mdash; right to profession.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &amp;ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &amp;ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &amp;lsquo;Right to life&#039; had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &amp;ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&amp;rdquo; the CJI said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Kapadia further said: &amp;ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Cannot interfere&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Only a regulation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &amp;ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arguments will continue on February 24.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.<br /><br />A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.<br /><br />Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners' fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &mdash; right to profession.<br /><br />The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.<br /><br />When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&rdquo;<br /><br />When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&rdquo;<br /><br />The &lsquo;Right to life' had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&rdquo; the CJI said.<br /><br />Justice Kapadia further said: &ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Cannot interfere'<br /></em><br />Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.<br /><br /><em>Only a regulation<br /></em><br />Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Arguments will continue on February 24.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6046,
		'title' => 'Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;<br />
</em><br />
Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.<br />
<br />
A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners' fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &mdash; right to profession.<br />
<br />
The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.<br />
<br />
When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The &lsquo;Right to life' had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&rdquo; the CJI said.<br />
<br />
Justice Kapadia further said: &ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
<em>&lsquo;Cannot interfere'<br />
</em><br />
Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.<br />
<br />
<em>Only a regulation<br />
</em><br />
Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Arguments will continue on February 24.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/18/stories/2011021864131100.htm',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6140,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6046,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Education',
	'metaDesc' => '
&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.<br /><br />A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.<br /><br />Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners' fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &mdash; right to profession.<br /><br />The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.<br /><br />When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&rdquo;<br /><br />When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&rdquo;<br /><br />The &lsquo;Right to life' had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&rdquo; the CJI said.<br /><br />Justice Kapadia further said: &ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Cannot interfere'<br /></em><br />Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.<br /><br /><em>Only a regulation<br /></em><br />Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Arguments will continue on February 24.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6046,
	'title' => 'Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;<br />
</em><br />
Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.<br />
<br />
A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.<br />
<br />
Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners' fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &mdash; right to profession.<br />
<br />
The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.<br />
<br />
When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The &lsquo;Right to life' had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&rdquo; the CJI said.<br />
<br />
Justice Kapadia further said: &ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
<em>&lsquo;Cannot interfere'<br />
</em><br />
Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.<br />
<br />
<em>Only a regulation<br />
</em><br />
Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Arguments will continue on February 24.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/18/stories/2011021864131100.htm',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'free-education-is-part-of-right-to-life-court-by-j-venkatesan-6140',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6140,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6046
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Education'
$metaDesc = '
&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;

Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under...'
$disp = '<div align="justify"><em>&ldquo;Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?&rdquo;<br /></em><br />Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of &ldquo;right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.<br /><br />A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education.<br /><br />Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners' fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) &mdash; right to profession.<br /><br />The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21.<br /><br />When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, &ldquo;What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.&rdquo;<br /><br />When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. &ldquo;Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?&rdquo;<br /><br />The &lsquo;Right to life' had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and &ldquo;when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,&rdquo; the CJI said.<br /><br />Justice Kapadia further said: &ldquo;When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>&lsquo;Cannot interfere'<br /></em><br />Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it.<br /><br /><em>Only a regulation<br /></em><br />Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel &ldquo;me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Arguments will continue on February 24.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Free education is part of right to life: Court by J Venkatesan

“Can you say access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by State?” Providing free and compulsory education is intended to allow all children in the age group 6-14 live with dignity, which is a facet of “right to life' under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Thursday. A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar was hearing arguments on petitions challenging the validity of the Right to Education Act, under which every child aged 6-14 shall have free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of elementary education. Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued that the Act directing schools to provide free and compulsory education to 25 per cent students violated the petitioners' fundamental right to establish and administer the educational institution. The Act was violative of the fundamental right of private, unaided schools enshrined in Article 19(1)(g) — right to profession. The CJI told counsel that the right to education should not be read in isolation; it should be tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (1) (g) and 21. When counsel argued that unreasonable restrictions had been imposed on educational institutions, the CJI said, “What we are concerned [with] here is egalitarian equality and not formal equality.” When Justice Kapadia asked whether the legislature could restrict the age to a particular group, counsel said it had such a power. The CJI then pointed out that similarly the legislature in its wisdom had carved out a particular class of disadvantaged people to provide free elementary education. “Can we not say that this is a reasonable classification within Article 14 itself?” The ‘Right to life' had undergone a sea change; it would include the right to education and the right to proper health care and “when you test the legality of the law, you have to test the inter-relationships with reference to the Directive Principles of State Policy also. If the object of the Act was to provide inter-generational equality, it would come under right to life,” the CJI said. Justice Kapadia further said: “When the state says that by providing free elementary education we want every child to live with dignity, can you say that access to education is an unreasonable restriction imposed by the state.” ‘Cannot interfere' Counsel, quoting the TMA Pai judgment, argued that admitting 100 per cent of the students to an institution was an absolute right and the state could not interfere with it. Only a regulation Justice Swatanter Kumar pointed out that it was only a regulation and the right to admit students was not taken away. Counsel argued that it was for the state to provide access to education in government schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas or aided schools, but it could not compel “me to admit 25 per cent of students as it affected my right to admit students of my choice.” Arguments will continue on February 24.