Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15170, 'title' => 'Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120525/jsp/nation/story_15530521.jsp#.T78JDbAzDww', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15295, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15170, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15170, 'title' => 'Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120525/jsp/nation/story_15530521.jsp#.T78JDbAzDww', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15295, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15170 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’ | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar’s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel’s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,” the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,” a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15170, 'title' => 'Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120525/jsp/nation/story_15530521.jsp#.T78JDbAzDww', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15295, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15170, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15170, 'title' => 'Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120525/jsp/nation/story_15530521.jsp#.T78JDbAzDww', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15295, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15170 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’ | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar’s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel’s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,” the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,” a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f424c4c7c95-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15170, 'title' => 'Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120525/jsp/nation/story_15530521.jsp#.T78JDbAzDww', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15295, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15170, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15170, 'title' => 'Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120525/jsp/nation/story_15530521.jsp#.T78JDbAzDww', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15295, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15170 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar&rsquo;s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel&rsquo;s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,&rdquo; the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,&rdquo; a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’ | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar’s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel’s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,” the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,” a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15170, 'title' => 'Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tendulkar’s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel’s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,” the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,” a plan panel official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120525/jsp/nation/story_15530521.jsp#.T78JDbAzDww', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15295, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15170, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar’s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel’s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,” the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,” a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15170, 'title' => 'Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tendulkar’s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel’s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,” the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,” a plan panel official said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120525/jsp/nation/story_15530521.jsp#.T78JDbAzDww', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'fresh-look-at-definition-of-poor-15295', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15295, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15170 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tendulkar’s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel’s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,” the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,” a plan panel official said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Fresh look at definition of ‘poor’ |
-The Telegraph The government today set up an expert committee to suggest a new methodology for determining who is poor and who is not, following widespread condemnation of its existing criteria last year. However, the five-member committee headed by C. Rangarajan, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, will also examine the existing methodology, which was suggested by a previous expert panel formed under Suresh Tendulkar. Tendulkar’s methodology was solely based on consumption expenditure. The definition of poverty was linked to how much a family spent on food and services such as education and health. In January last year, the Planning Commission had accepted the Tendulkar panel’s criteria, which suggested a rural citizen be considered poor if he spent less than Rs 447 a month. The cut-off for urban citizens was Rs 578 a month. Both figures had been calculated according to the 2004-05 price index. Converted to 2011 prices, the cut-offs became Rs 781 per head per month in rural areas and Rs 965 per head per month in urban areas. This pegged the per day, per head expenditure at Rs 26 in rural areas and Rs 32 in urban areas. After a plan panel affidavit in the Supreme Court brought these criteria under the limelight, there was severe questioning from many chief ministers, food rights activists and members of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council such as Aruna Roy and former member Jean Dreze. The critics said these cut-offs were arbitrary and much too low. A few activists moved the Supreme Court too. Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his then Uttar Pradesh counterpart Mayawati wrote to the Prime Minister that this way of estimating poverty would leave many deserving households out of the ambit of welfare schemes. “Taking note of the various points of view and perspectives expressed in the public domain... the government has decided to set up an expert technical group to revisit the methodology for estimation of poverty and identification of the poor,” the minister of state for planning, Ashwini Kumar, told a news conference today. However, the government reaffirmed that its poverty estimates would not be used to identify the beneficiaries of welfare schemes. “The poverty estimate will be used for policy planning and as a reference point to assess improvement in poverty reduction. Such estimates also (make it clear) whether the welfare schemes are helping improve the condition of the poor,” a plan panel official said. The beneficiaries of welfare schemes will be identified on the basis of the ongoing BPL (below poverty line) survey, officials said. Ashwini Kumar said the Rangarajan committee would examine whether the definition of poverty should be fixed solely in terms of consumption or whether such criteria as income, purchasing power and quality of dwellings should be considered too. Nitish Kumar has written to the Prime Minister demanding that a separate BPL commission, set up through an act of Parliament, be tasked with setting the criteria to estimate poverty and identifying the poor. The government has not taken any decision on this. The other members of the Rangarajan committee are Mahendra Dev, director of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; K. Sundaram, former professor at the Delhi School of Economics; Mahesh Vyas from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy; and K.L. Datta, former adviser to the Planning Commission. The committee has not been set a timetable to hand in its report.
|