Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1007, 'title' => 'Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/23/stories/2010012356132200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1081, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1007, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1007, 'title' => 'Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/23/stories/2010012356132200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1081, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1007 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Gender-based discrimination cases come down</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled “Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index” says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1007, 'title' => 'Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/23/stories/2010012356132200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1081, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1007, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1007, 'title' => 'Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/23/stories/2010012356132200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1081, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1007 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Gender-based discrimination cases come down</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled “Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index” says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f6fb76bb6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1007, 'title' => 'Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/23/stories/2010012356132200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1081, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1007, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1007, 'title' => 'Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/23/stories/2010012356132200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1081, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1007 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled &ldquo;Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index&rdquo; says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Gender-based discrimination cases come down</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled “Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index” says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1007, 'title' => 'Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled “Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index” says. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/23/stories/2010012356132200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1081, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1007, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled “Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index” says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1007, 'title' => 'Gender-based discrimination cases come down', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled “Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index” says. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 23 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/23/stories/2010012356132200.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gender-based-discrimination-cases-come-down-1081', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1081, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1007 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gender-based discrimination cases come down' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font >Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled “Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index” says. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >The HDI score for India was 0.0530 in 1996 and 0.605 in 2006. The score for 2006 was highest for Chandigarh at 0.784 and lowest for Bihar at 0.507. The GDI score for India was 0.514 in 1996 and 0.509 in 2006. The score was highest for 2006 for Chandigarh at 0.763 and lowest for Bihar at 0.479. The GDI and HDI are calculated on the basis of health, literacy and standard of life. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Gender-based discrimination cases come down |
Gender-based disparities have shown a decline in the country in the last decade with the national capital scoring the highest, according to a report by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. There is an overall improvement in the performance on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) over the decade, both in the all-India score and in the scores achieved by the States and Union Territories, the report titled “Gendering Human Development Indices: Recasting the Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure for Index” says. The GEM is calculated on political participation and decision-making power, economic participation and decision-making power and power over economic resources of women. The GEM score for India, which was 0.416 in 1996, increased to 0.497 in 2006. As many as 14 States and Union Territories achieved GEM scores of above 0.485 in 2006, while only two had achieved scores higher than this in 1996. The only two States to have achieved a score above 0.485 in 1996 and 2006 are Goa and Kerala. The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi had the highest score of 0.564 in 2006, jumping from rank three to occupy the top slot. Nagaland, on the other hand, got the lowest rank, both in 2006 and 1996 with GEM scores of 0.289 and 0.165 respectively. While 13 States improved their ranks over the decade, 19 lost their respective position during the same period. The newly formed Jharkhand and Uttarakhand achieved large gains of 0.157 and 0.132 respectively and improved their ranks by six positions each. While Uttar Pradesh and Bihar performed slightly better, the improvement in their GEM was lower in comparison (0.118 and 0.101 respectively). Chhattisgarh improved its score by only 0.058, compared with an improvement of 0.056 by Madhya Pradesh. These States lost four and five ranks respectively. However, the biggest GEM rank losers are Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Chandigarh and Lakshadweep. The Human Development Index (HDI), the Gender Development Index (GDI) and GEM scores attained by the States and Union Territories and changes in the scores and ranks over time reflect performance on these indices and the extent to which progress has been made in translating its growth into a better quality of life.
|