Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13378, 'title' => 'Get out of the kitchen', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 March, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/get-outthe-kitchen/466718/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13500, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13378, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen', 'metaKeywords' => 'subsidy', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13378, 'title' => 'Get out of the kitchen', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 March, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/get-outthe-kitchen/466718/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13500, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13378 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen' $metaKeywords = 'subsidy' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Get out of the kitchen</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man’s fuel. Yet, the government’s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder’s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13378, 'title' => 'Get out of the kitchen', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 March, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/get-outthe-kitchen/466718/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13500, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13378, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen', 'metaKeywords' => 'subsidy', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13378, 'title' => 'Get out of the kitchen', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 March, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/get-outthe-kitchen/466718/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13500, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13378 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen' $metaKeywords = 'subsidy' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Get out of the kitchen</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man’s fuel. Yet, the government’s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder’s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fe786281dfd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13378, 'title' => 'Get out of the kitchen', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 March, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/get-outthe-kitchen/466718/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13500, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13378, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen', 'metaKeywords' => 'subsidy', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13378, 'title' => 'Get out of the kitchen', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 March, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/get-outthe-kitchen/466718/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13500, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13378 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen' $metaKeywords = 'subsidy' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry&rsquo;s &ldquo;single kitchen&rdquo; concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man&rsquo;s fuel. Yet, the government&rsquo;s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder&rsquo;s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Get out of the kitchen</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man’s fuel. Yet, the government’s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder’s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13378, 'title' => 'Get out of the kitchen', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man’s fuel. Yet, the government’s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder’s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 March, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/get-outthe-kitchen/466718/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13500, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13378, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen', 'metaKeywords' => 'subsidy', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man’s fuel. Yet, the government’s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder’s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13378, 'title' => 'Get out of the kitchen', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man’s fuel. Yet, the government’s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder’s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 March, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/get-outthe-kitchen/466718/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'get-out-of-the-kitchen-13500', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13500, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13378 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Get out of the kitchen' $metaKeywords = 'subsidy' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Govt should not explore unworkable solutions</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man’s fuel. Yet, the government’s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder’s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Get out of the kitchen |
-The Business Standard Govt should not explore unworkable solutions The petroleum ministry’s “single kitchen” concept for new consumers of liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, is a classic case of using a flawed solution to compensate for policy distortions in the pricing of petroleum products. The norm of allowing one LPG connection per household with one kitchen may look good on paper but it is hardly a foolproof mechanism to curb the misuse of the highly subsidised fuel. New consumers are required to give an undertaking that neither she nor any family member has a gas connection in the single-kitchen house (the penalty for violation is hardly draconian: the consumer forfeits her security deposit, which is a couple of thousand rupees). The first real issue is how to define a kitchen: does it mean any room that has a stove? Or does it also require a sink and a refrigerator? The possibilities for corruption in the definition alone are immense. But the larger question remains: does the government really need to subsidise LPG? It is, after all, scarcely a poor man’s fuel. Yet, the government’s subsidy to middle-class and rich households has grown five-fold over the past eight or nine years and now ranges around Rs 25,000-30,000 crore annually. And this is not the only anomaly. Usually, a subsidised product must be given in limited quantity. However, LPG is available in large quantities: a consumer is entitled to a refill after every 21 days, which means she can buy 17 subsidised LPG cylinders a year and avail of a (wholly unnecessary) subsidy of over Rs 6,400. Given that not all consumers refill after 21 days, it is inevitable that the cooking gas dealer diverts domestic LPG for commercial use, for which prices are market-linked. Nearly nine million new connections were given during the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which will increase the subsidy by seven or eight per cent. And, disturbingly, the drop in kerosene consumption is not proportionate to the expansion of LPG coverage. Urban households get a large part of the LPG subsidy even when they have the capacity to pay the market price and will use it even at higher prices. Past data from surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation show that households have the flexibility to absorb certain additional costs on LPG by adjusting expenditure on discretionary items. Accordingly, LPG price can be increased at least to the extent the householder’s income has increased so that the proportion of income that it spends on LPG remains the same. Nor is a price rise tough to implement, since the political will for an LPG price rise clearly exists. Last year, a parliamentary standing committee recommended scrapping the subsidy for anyone with annual incomes of over Rs 6 lakh, including those holding constitutional posts, public representatives like members of Parliament, state Assemblies and Councils. If the government recognises that there is a strong case for encouraging the poor to use a clean fuel like LPG and target the subsidy to them, it makes more sense if there is one market-linked price; any subsidy should be transferred to the targeted consumer through either an entitlement scheme or cash transfers.
|