Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150325/jsp/frontpage/story_10719.jsp#.VRIhx473-xM&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675657,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Section 66A of IT Act,Freedom of Speech,Cyber Space,internet,Cyber Laws,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150325/jsp/frontpage/story_10719.jsp#.VRIhx473-xM&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675657,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27606
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Section 66A of IT Act,Freedom of Speech,Cyber Space,internet,Cyber Laws,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify">Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.</p><p align="justify">Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. </p><p align="justify">Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.</p><p align="justify">The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.</p><p align="justify">Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.</p><p align="justify">The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.</p><p align="justify">This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&quot;</p><p align="justify">While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.</p><p align="justify">At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &quot;congratulations to all the winners&quot; of the national film awards.</p><p align="justify">No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.</p><p align="justify">&quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.</p><p align="justify">Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.</p><p align="justify">In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &quot;his own protection&quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.</p><p align="justify">But Shreya added: &quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.</p><p align="justify">But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.</p><p align="justify">Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.</p><p align="justify">Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.</p><p align="justify">Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.</p><p align="justify">Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.</p><p align="justify">Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today's judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150325/jsp/frontpage/story_10719.jsp#.VRIhx473-xM&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675657,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Section 66A of IT Act,Freedom of Speech,Cyber Space,internet,Cyber Laws,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150325/jsp/frontpage/story_10719.jsp#.VRIhx473-xM&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675657,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27606
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Section 66A of IT Act,Freedom of Speech,Cyber Space,internet,Cyber Laws,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify">Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.</p><p align="justify">Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. </p><p align="justify">Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.</p><p align="justify">The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.</p><p align="justify">Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.</p><p align="justify">The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.</p><p align="justify">This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&quot;</p><p align="justify">While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.</p><p align="justify">At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &quot;congratulations to all the winners&quot; of the national film awards.</p><p align="justify">No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.</p><p align="justify">&quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.</p><p align="justify">Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.</p><p align="justify">In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &quot;his own protection&quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.</p><p align="justify">But Shreya added: &quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.</p><p align="justify">But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.</p><p align="justify">Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.</p><p align="justify">Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.</p><p align="justify">Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.</p><p align="justify">Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.</p><p align="justify">Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today's judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f076cc76c27-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150325/jsp/frontpage/story_10719.jsp#.VRIhx473-xM&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675657,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Section 66A of IT Act,Freedom of Speech,Cyber Space,internet,Cyber Laws,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27606,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 March, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150325/jsp/frontpage/story_10719.jsp#.VRIhx473-xM&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675657,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27606
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Section 66A of IT Act,Freedom of Speech,Cyber Space,internet,Cyber Laws,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &amp;quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &amp;quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &amp;quot;congratulations to all the winners&amp;quot; of the national film awards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&amp;quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &amp;quot;his own protection&amp;quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Shreya added: &amp;quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&amp;quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today&#039;s judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify">Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.</p><p align="justify">Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. </p><p align="justify">Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.</p><p align="justify">The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.</p><p align="justify">Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.</p><p align="justify">The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.</p><p align="justify">This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&quot;</p><p align="justify">While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.</p><p align="justify">At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &quot;congratulations to all the winners&quot; of the national film awards.</p><p align="justify">No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.</p><p align="justify">&quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.</p><p align="justify">Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.</p><p align="justify">In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &quot;his own protection&quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.</p><p align="justify">But Shreya added: &quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.</p><p align="justify">But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.</p><p align="justify">Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.</p><p align="justify">Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.</p><p align="justify">Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.</p><p align="justify">Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.</p><p align="justify">Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today's judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 27606,
		'title' => 'Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. 
</p>
<p align="justify">
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.
</p>
<p align="justify">
This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &quot;congratulations to all the winners&quot; of the national film awards.
</p>
<p align="justify">
No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &quot;his own protection&quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But Shreya added: &quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today's judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 March, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150325/jsp/frontpage/story_10719.jsp#.VRIhx473-xM',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4675657,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 27606,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Section 66A of IT Act,Freedom of Speech,Cyber Space,internet,Cyber Laws,Supreme Court',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify">Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.</p><p align="justify">Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. </p><p align="justify">Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.</p><p align="justify">The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.</p><p align="justify">Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.</p><p align="justify">The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.</p><p align="justify">This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&quot;</p><p align="justify">While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.</p><p align="justify">At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &quot;congratulations to all the winners&quot; of the national film awards.</p><p align="justify">No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.</p><p align="justify">&quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.</p><p align="justify">Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.</p><p align="justify">In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &quot;his own protection&quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.</p><p align="justify">But Shreya added: &quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.</p><p align="justify">But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.</p><p align="justify">Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.</p><p align="justify">Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.</p><p align="justify">Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.</p><p align="justify">Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.</p><p align="justify">Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today's judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 27606,
	'title' => 'Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. 
</p>
<p align="justify">
Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.
</p>
<p align="justify">
This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &quot;congratulations to all the winners&quot; of the national film awards.
</p>
<p align="justify">
No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &quot;his own protection&quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But Shreya added: &quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today's judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 March, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150325/jsp/frontpage/story_10719.jsp#.VRIhx473-xM',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'girl-who-saved-free-speech-r-balaji-4675657',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4675657,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 27606
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji'
$metaKeywords = 'Section 66A of IT Act,Freedom of Speech,Cyber Space,internet,Cyber Laws,Supreme Court'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph


Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.


Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify">Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech.</p><p align="justify">Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. </p><p align="justify">Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics.</p><p align="justify">The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime.</p><p align="justify">Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power.</p><p align="justify">The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests.</p><p align="justify">This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: &quot;Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: &quot;A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests.&quot;</p><p align="justify">While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent.</p><p align="justify">At 7pm, Mamata tweeted &quot;congratulations to all the winners&quot; of the national film awards.</p><p align="justify">No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech.</p><p align="justify">&quot;I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case,&quot; said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in.</p><p align="justify">Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance.</p><p align="justify">In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for &quot;his own protection&quot; although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence.</p><p align="justify">But Shreya added: &quot;I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK.</p><p align="justify">But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies.</p><p align="justify">Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court.</p><p align="justify">Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray.</p><p align="justify">&quot;It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?&quot; Shreya recalled telling her mother.</p><p align="justify">Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression.</p><p align="justify">Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya.</p><p align="justify">Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today's judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Girl who saved free speech -R Balaji

-The Telegraph Shreya Singhal has helped undo what the UPA, the NDA and Mamata Banerjee had done to free speech. Shreya, the girl who once woke up with consternation to news that two girls in Maharashtra had been booked for a Facebook post, was the first petitioner who approached the Supreme Court against Section 66A, which was struck down today. Section 66A of the Information Technology Act has been the favourite tool of those in power to arrest and torment critics. The Mamata government was among the pioneers that discovered the harassment value of Section 66A, a clause that was passed in 2008 with the support of most mainstream parties. Long before that, the Jyoti Basu government had proved that it did not need Section 66A and the Indian Penal Code was enough for a vindictive regime. Today, P. Chidambaram, whose son had used the section against a critic, welcomed the verdict although the amendment was added when the UPA was in power. The BJP split hairs and denied a somersault, although it had defended Section 66A in court and the current telecom minister was on a parliamentary panel that sought measures to make cyber offences a cognisable offence, which permits discretionary arrests. This is what the Supreme Court had to say about Section 66A before striking it down: "Such is the reach of the section and if it is to withstand the test of constitutionality, the chilling effect on free speech would be total." Amid the rush among national movers and shakers to embrace free speech after the verdict, Shreya pointed out: "A change of government makes no difference. Earlier the UPA government was defending it and the new NDA government also did so. The impunity with which people were arrested was shocking. Even when the matter was pending in the court, police were making arrests." While some national leaders grinned and bore it, Mamata, whose government had arrested Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra for circulating a joke on her and charged him under Section 66A, remained silent. At 7pm, Mamata tweeted "congratulations to all the winners" of the national film awards. No prizes for guessing Mamata did not congratulate Shreya, who was recovering from a nervous night and beginning to savour the triumph of free speech. "I was nervous last night. But today I will celebrate. You never know, another argument might just lead to another case," said Shreya, who had filed the initial petition, following which others had joined in. Shreya has reason to be wary. The death of Section 66A does not ensure the survival of free speech or personal liberties. There are enough provisions in the Indian Penal Code to harass citizens if those in power are willing to pursue them with vengeance. In fact, the offences under Section 66A were bailable, which meant the suspects picked up could be given bail at the police station itself. The police slapped other laws to keep some in custody or, as in the case of the JU professor, simply kept the accused in the dark about their rights. Mahapatra was kept in the police station for "his own protection" although he was not charged with any non-bailable offence. But Shreya added: "I am very happy with the judgment. The Supreme Court has only reinforced our faith in it. Our freedom of speech and expression has been upheld. My family has always been my pillar of strength." Shreya had graduated in science in July 2012 from the University of Bristol, the UK. But her regular visits to the Supreme Court to pursue this case with her mother Manali left such an indelible impression on her that she chose to take up juridical studies. Shreya is now a second-year law student at Delhi University, making her a third-generation member of her family to pursue law. Her mother Manali is a senior lawyer while her grandmother Sunanda Bhandare was a judge with Delhi High Court. Shreya had just returned to Delhi from abroad in 2012 when she read about the arrest of two Mumbai girls for a Facebook post on the shutdown that followed the death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray. "It could have been me or my friend. How could one be arrested for questioning the shutdown of a city?" Shreya recalled telling her mother. Manali said she had suggested in a lighter vein that her daughter should file a PIL in the apex court if she was so concerned about freedom of speech and expression. Shreya consulted Ninad Seth, a younger colleague of Manali, and moved court. Former attorney-general Soli Sorabjee, whom Manali had assisted in a number of cases, appeared free of cost for Shreya. Important judgments of the Supreme Court are included in the curriculum of law students. Shreya will have to wait and see if today's judgment makes the curriculum next year before she graduates.