Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Live Mint
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;
States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Live Mint, 26 September, 2013, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/7gOKPGqvBXEhiZahIKDWNP/Goa-Kerala-relatively-developed-Gujarat-less-developed.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22801,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;inclusive growth,Economic Development,Economic Growth,multidimensional poverty,Human Development&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Live Mint&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Live Mint
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;
States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Live Mint, 26 September, 2013, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/7gOKPGqvBXEhiZahIKDWNP/Goa-Kerala-relatively-developed-Gujarat-less-developed.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22801,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22648
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;inclusive growth,Economic Development,Economic Growth,multidimensional poverty,Human Development&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Live Mint&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Live Mint</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted </em></p><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.</p><p align="justify"><img src="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg" alt="state" width="676" height="460" /> </p><p align="justify">Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India's most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.</p><p align="justify">The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.</p><p align="justify">The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &quot;relatively developed&quot;, according to the committee.</p><p align="justify">The other states in the &quot;relatively developed&quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.<br />Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &quot;Gujarat model&quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India's next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.</p><p align="justify">Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government's attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.</p><p align="justify">The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">As per the committee's calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.</p><p align="justify">Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.<br />States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.</p><p align="justify">The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state's overall share.</p><p align="justify">According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Live Mint
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;
States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Live Mint, 26 September, 2013, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/7gOKPGqvBXEhiZahIKDWNP/Goa-Kerala-relatively-developed-Gujarat-less-developed.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22801,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;inclusive growth,Economic Development,Economic Growth,multidimensional poverty,Human Development&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Live Mint&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Live Mint
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;
States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Live Mint, 26 September, 2013, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/7gOKPGqvBXEhiZahIKDWNP/Goa-Kerala-relatively-developed-Gujarat-less-developed.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22801,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22648
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;inclusive growth,Economic Development,Economic Growth,multidimensional poverty,Human Development&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Live Mint&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Live Mint</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted </em></p><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.</p><p align="justify"><img src="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg" alt="state" width="676" height="460" /> </p><p align="justify">Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India's most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.</p><p align="justify">The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.</p><p align="justify">The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &quot;relatively developed&quot;, according to the committee.</p><p align="justify">The other states in the &quot;relatively developed&quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.<br />Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &quot;Gujarat model&quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India's next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.</p><p align="justify">Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government's attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.</p><p align="justify">The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">As per the committee's calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.</p><p align="justify">Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.<br />States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.</p><p align="justify">The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state's overall share.</p><p align="justify">According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802ac4ee3359-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Live Mint
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;
States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Live Mint, 26 September, 2013, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/7gOKPGqvBXEhiZahIKDWNP/Goa-Kerala-relatively-developed-Gujarat-less-developed.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22801,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;inclusive growth,Economic Development,Economic Growth,multidimensional poverty,Human Development&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Live Mint&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22648,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Live Mint
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;
States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Live Mint, 26 September, 2013, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/7gOKPGqvBXEhiZahIKDWNP/Goa-Kerala-relatively-developed-Gujarat-less-developed.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22801,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22648
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;inclusive growth,Economic Development,Economic Growth,multidimensional poverty,Human Development&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Live Mint&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report&#039;s funding formula is accepted &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;state&quot; width=&quot;676&quot; height=&quot;460&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India&#039;s most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot;, according to the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The other states in the &amp;quot;relatively developed&amp;quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &amp;quot;Gujarat model&amp;quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India&#039;s next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government&#039;s attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As per the committee&#039;s calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state&#039;s development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state&#039;s overall share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Live Mint</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted </em></p><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.</p><p align="justify"><img src="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg" alt="state" width="676" height="460" /> </p><p align="justify">Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India's most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.</p><p align="justify">The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.</p><p align="justify">The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &quot;relatively developed&quot;, according to the committee.</p><p align="justify">The other states in the &quot;relatively developed&quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.<br />Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &quot;Gujarat model&quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India's next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.</p><p align="justify">Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government's attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.</p><p align="justify">The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">As per the committee's calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.</p><p align="justify">Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.<br />States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.</p><p align="justify">The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state's overall share.</p><p align="justify">According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 22648,
		'title' => 'Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Live Mint
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted </em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>New Delhi: </em>Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<img src="tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg" alt="state" width="676" height="460" /> 
</p>
<p align="justify">
Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India's most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &quot;relatively developed&quot;, according to the committee.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The other states in the &quot;relatively developed&quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.<br />
Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &quot;Gujarat model&quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India's next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government's attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.
</p>
<p align="justify">
As per the committee's calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.<br />
States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state's overall share.
</p>
<p align="justify">
According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 26 September, 2013, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/7gOKPGqvBXEhiZahIKDWNP/Goa-Kerala-relatively-developed-Gujarat-less-developed.html',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 22801,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 22648,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair',
	'metaKeywords' => 'inclusive growth,Economic Development,Economic Growth,multidimensional poverty,Human Development',
	'metaDesc' => '
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Live Mint</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted </em></p><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.</p><p align="justify"><img src="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg" alt="state" width="676" height="460" /> </p><p align="justify">Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India's most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.</p><p align="justify">The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.</p><p align="justify">The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &quot;relatively developed&quot;, according to the committee.</p><p align="justify">The other states in the &quot;relatively developed&quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.<br />Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &quot;Gujarat model&quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India's next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.</p><p align="justify">Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government's attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.</p><p align="justify">The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">As per the committee's calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.</p><p align="justify">Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.<br />States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.</p><p align="justify">The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state's overall share.</p><p align="justify">According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 22648,
	'title' => 'Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Live Mint
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted </em>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<em>New Delhi: </em>Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.
</p>
<p align="justify">
<img src="tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg" alt="state" width="676" height="460" /> 
</p>
<p align="justify">
Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India's most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &quot;relatively developed&quot;, according to the committee.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The other states in the &quot;relatively developed&quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.<br />
Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &quot;Gujarat model&quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India's next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government's attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.
</p>
<p align="justify">
As per the committee's calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.<br />
States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state's overall share.
</p>
<p align="justify">
According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 26 September, 2013, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/7gOKPGqvBXEhiZahIKDWNP/Goa-Kerala-relatively-developed-Gujarat-less-developed.html',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'goa-kerala-relatively-developed-gujarat-less-developed-rajan-panel-remya-nair-22801',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 22801,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 22648
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair'
$metaKeywords = 'inclusive growth,Economic Development,Economic Growth,multidimensional poverty,Human Development'
$metaDesc = '
-Live Mint



BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted 


New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-Live Mint</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted </em></p><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states.</p><p align="justify"><img src="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/state_1.jpg" alt="state" width="676" height="460" /> </p><p align="justify">Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India's most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states.</p><p align="justify">The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio.</p><p align="justify">The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the &quot;relatively developed&quot;, according to the committee.</p><p align="justify">The other states in the &quot;relatively developed&quot; list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana.<br />Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the &quot;Gujarat model&quot; one of the talking points of his run to be India's next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development.</p><p align="justify">Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government's attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar.</p><p align="justify">The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.</p><p align="justify">As per the committee's calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%.</p><p align="justify">Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier.</p><p align="justify">The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement.<br />States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee.</p><p align="justify">The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state's overall share.</p><p align="justify">According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Goa, Kerala ‘relatively developed’, Gujarat ‘less developed’: Rajan panel- Remya Nair

-Live Mint BJP-ruled states to get more funds, while most Congress-ruled states will lose out if report's funding formula is accepted New Delhi: Odisha, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the least developed (or the most backward) in that order, according to a government committee whose recommendations, if accepted, will mean a larger share of central funds for these states. Goa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu are India's most developed states, according to the report of the Raghuram Rajan committee that looked into the backwardness of states. The committee arrived at this conclusion by creating an index that used measures such as per capita consumption and poverty ratio. The index ranges from 0 to 1 with 1 being the most backward and 0 the least backwardm or the "relatively developed", according to the committee. The other states in the "relatively developed" list include Punjab, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Haryana. Interestingly, Gujarat, whose chief minister Narendra Modihas made the "Gujarat model" one of the talking points of his run to be India's next Prime Minister, figures in the list of less developed states. Indeed, it is ranked 12 in terms of development. Finance minister P. Chidambaram had set up a committee under Rajan, then chief economic adviser in the finance ministry and presently Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, to examine the backwardness criterion, in a move that was attributed to the Congress party-led government's attempt to woo Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar. The Bihar government has been asking that it be classified as a backward state so that it could get access to more central funds. The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement. As per the committee's calculations, Bihar should get 12.04% of the total funds allocated for states by the centre, as against its current share of 7.42% under the total central assistance to state plans and centrally sponsored schemes. Rajasthan should get 8.42% as against 4.79% at present, Odisha 6.53% as against 4.62% amd Madhya Pradesh 9.56% as against 6.91%. Uttar Pradesh will continue corner the largest share of central assistance at 16.41% of total funds, as against 10.09% earlier. The committee has proposed a general method for allocating funds from the Centre to the states based on both a state's development needs as well as its development performance, Chidambaram said in a statement. States that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as least developed, states that score between 0.4 and 0.6 may be classified as less developed, and states that score below 0.4 may be classified as relatively developed, according to the recommendations of the committee. The committee has asked that each state be allocated 0.3% of the overall funds. An amount will be added to this share depending on the need and performance of each state to arrive at the state's overall share. According to the committee, the fixed allocation and classification based on the index will adequately address the demand of funds from states.