Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68270453bc761-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68270453bc761-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68270453bc761-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17727, 'title' => 'GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 29 October, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ryXMDNTVsaQAnkff5OmrDL/GoM-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17856, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17727, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp; Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17727, 'title' => 'GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 29 October, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ryXMDNTVsaQAnkff5OmrDL/GoM-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17856, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17727 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp; Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill “prospectively”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of “public purpose” will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,” Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers’ panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers’ panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. “It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,” Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. “We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. “We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,” director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story. </em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68270453bc761-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68270453bc761-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68270453bc761-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17727, 'title' => 'GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 29 October, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ryXMDNTVsaQAnkff5OmrDL/GoM-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17856, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17727, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp; Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17727, 'title' => 'GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 29 October, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ryXMDNTVsaQAnkff5OmrDL/GoM-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17856, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17727 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp; Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill “prospectively”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of “public purpose” will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,” Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers’ panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers’ panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. “It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,” Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. “We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. “We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,” director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story. </em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68270453bc761-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68270453bc761-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68270453bc761-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68270453bc761-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17727, 'title' => 'GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 29 October, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ryXMDNTVsaQAnkff5OmrDL/GoM-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17856, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17727, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp; Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17727, 'title' => 'GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 29 October, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ryXMDNTVsaQAnkff5OmrDL/GoM-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17856, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17727 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp; Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill &ldquo;prospectively&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo; will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,&rdquo; Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers&rsquo; panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers&rsquo; panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. &ldquo;It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,&rdquo; Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,&rdquo; Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. &ldquo;We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. &ldquo;We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,&rdquo; director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.&nbsp;</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill “prospectively”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of “public purpose” will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,” Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers’ panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers’ panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. “It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,” Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. “We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. “We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,” director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story. </em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17727, 'title' => 'GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill “prospectively”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the definition of “public purpose” will determine the nature of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,” Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,” Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers’ panel, Pawar added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers’ panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. “It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,” Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,” Ramesh added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. “We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,” he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. “We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,” director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story. </em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 29 October, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ryXMDNTVsaQAnkff5OmrDL/GoM-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17856, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17727, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill “prospectively”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of “public purpose” will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,” Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers’ panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers’ panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. “It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,” Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. “We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. “We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,” director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story. </em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17727, 'title' => 'GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill “prospectively”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the definition of “public purpose” will determine the nature of land acquisition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,” Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,” Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers’ panel, Pawar added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers’ panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. “It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,” Pawar said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,” Ramesh added. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. “We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,” he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. “We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,” director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story. </em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 29 October, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ryXMDNTVsaQAnkff5OmrDL/GoM-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gom-proposes-tougher-land-acquisition-norms-elizabeth-roche-17856', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17856, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17727 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill “prospectively”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the definition of “public purpose” will determine the nature of land acquisition.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,” Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers’ panel, Pawar added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers’ panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. “It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,” Pawar said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,” Ramesh added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. “We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,” he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. “We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,” director general Chandrajit Banerjee said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story. </em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
GoM proposes tougher land acquisition norms-Elizabeth Roche |
-Live Mint Panel recommends consent of 80% of land owners; key ministers say it would lead to unreasonable delays Land acquisition for public-private partnership projects (PPP) will become tougher if the government accepts the recommendation of the group of ministers (GoM) and includes it in the new land Bill that it proposes to move in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. The ministerial body has recommended that the consent of 80% of farmers or land owners is needed to acquire land. But in what could be a relief to many state governments embroiled in controversies over the acquisition of the land, the GoM headed by agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has decided to make the application of the Bill “prospectively”. However, the definition of “public purpose” will determine the nature of land acquisition. “The land acquired (by government) for railways, defence, atomic energy projects and affordable housing will be treated as for public purpose,” Pawar, who had a brief meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, told reporters on Monday. “For land acquired for government purpose, there is no consent required though rehabilitation will be compulsory,” Pawar said. Rehabilitation and resettlement issues have been given priority in the recommendations of the ministers’ panel, Pawar added. The proposed law, renamed the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, 2011, which seeks to replace the Act of 1894, was referred to the GoM in August. This followed differences within the Cabinet with key ministers expressing concerns that the law would lead to unreasonable delays in acquiring land. One of the major points of dispute was whether the purchase of the land from farmers should have the consent of 67% of owners. A previous draft of the Bill had required the permission of 80% of farmers before the government could acquire land for public-private partnership projects. The GoM constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August had three different views with one section saying that land can be acquired if 67% of owners agree, while others wanted consent of 80% and 90%. Pawar said he would circulate the minutes of the three meetings of the ministers’ panel by Tuesday, seeking a response within a week. “It is possible for the government to introduce the Bill in the upcoming session,” Pawar said. Ramesh has been keen on the passage of the Bill in the winter session beginning 22 November and ending on 20 December. “It can go to the Union Cabinet (for the final approval before bringing it to Parliament) by 15 November,” Ramesh added. Pawar also clarified that if the land is acquired by individuals or by private firms for their business, the government would not enter the picture. “We have left rehabilitation plans in this category to the state government,” he said. Once passed by Parliament, the Act will be an enabling legislation on which state governments can base their law. The compensation amount for land losers has been set at 2x for urban areas and 4x for rural areas. But state governments will be given flexibility to decide the amount. The Confederation of Indian Industry lobby group expressed its concern with the proposed move. “We had recommended 60% consent from the land owners and we were willing to accept consent from two-third land owners. But anything beyond that would be too difficult and make the whole process cumbersome and time taking,” director general Chandrajit Banerjee said. Moulishree Srivastava contributed to this story.
|