Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25411, 'title' => 'Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. </p> <p align="justify"> A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. </p> <p align="justify"> This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. </p> <p align="justify"> Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. </p> <p align="justify"> Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. </p> <p align="justify"> For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. </p> <p align="justify"> Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 15 July, 2014, http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act/articleshow/38395323.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673445, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25411, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,land act', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25411, 'title' => 'Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. </p> <p align="justify"> A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. </p> <p align="justify"> This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. </p> <p align="justify"> Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. </p> <p align="justify"> Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. </p> <p align="justify"> For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. </p> <p align="justify"> Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 15 July, 2014, http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act/articleshow/38395323.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673445, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25411 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,land act' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the "power to define public purpose" and feels the present act is an "infringement upon the state's autonomy." UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, "consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted" and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. "Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem," said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, "social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects." </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25411, 'title' => 'Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. </p> <p align="justify"> A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. </p> <p align="justify"> This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. </p> <p align="justify"> Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. </p> <p align="justify"> Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. </p> <p align="justify"> For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. </p> <p align="justify"> Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 15 July, 2014, http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act/articleshow/38395323.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673445, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25411, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,land act', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25411, 'title' => 'Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. </p> <p align="justify"> A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. </p> <p align="justify"> This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. </p> <p align="justify"> Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. </p> <p align="justify"> Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. </p> <p align="justify"> For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. </p> <p align="justify"> Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 15 July, 2014, http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act/articleshow/38395323.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673445, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25411 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,land act' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the "power to define public purpose" and feels the present act is an "infringement upon the state's autonomy." UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, "consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted" and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. "Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem," said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, "social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects." </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f3d6c2ba13d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25411, 'title' => 'Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. </p> <p align="justify"> A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. </p> <p align="justify"> This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. </p> <p align="justify"> Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. </p> <p align="justify"> Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. </p> <p align="justify"> For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. </p> <p align="justify"> Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 15 July, 2014, http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act/articleshow/38395323.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673445, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25411, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,land act', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25411, 'title' => 'Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. </p> <p align="justify"> A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. </p> <p align="justify"> This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. </p> <p align="justify"> Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. </p> <p align="justify"> Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. </p> <p align="justify"> For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. </p> <p align="justify"> Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 15 July, 2014, http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act/articleshow/38395323.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673445, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25411 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,land act' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the &quot;power to define public purpose&quot; and feels the present act is an &quot;infringement upon the state's autonomy.&quot; UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, &quot;consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted&quot; and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. &quot;Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem,&quot; said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, &quot;social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects.&quot; </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the "power to define public purpose" and feels the present act is an "infringement upon the state's autonomy." UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, "consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted" and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. "Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem," said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, "social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects." </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25411, 'title' => 'Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. </p> <p align="justify"> A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. </p> <p align="justify"> This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. </p> <p align="justify"> Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. </p> <p align="justify"> Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. </p> <p align="justify"> For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the "power to define public purpose" and feels the present act is an "infringement upon the state's autonomy." UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. </p> <p align="justify"> Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, "consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted" and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. "Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem," said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, "social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects." </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 15 July, 2014, http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act/articleshow/38395323.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673445, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25411, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,land act', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the "power to define public purpose" and feels the present act is an "infringement upon the state's autonomy." UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, "consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted" and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. "Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem," said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, "social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects." </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25411, 'title' => 'Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. </p> <p align="justify"> A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. </p> <p align="justify"> This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. </p> <p align="justify"> Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. </p> <p align="justify"> Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. </p> <p align="justify"> For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the "power to define public purpose" and feels the present act is an "infringement upon the state's autonomy." UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. </p> <p align="justify"> Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. </p> <p align="justify"> The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, "consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted" and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. "Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem," said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, "social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects." </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 15 July, 2014, http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act/articleshow/38395323.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'government-calls-all-party-meet-to-relook-on-land-acquisition-act-4673445', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673445, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25411 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,land act' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight. A consensus at the meeting of all parties...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br />Most state governments have sought a relook at UPA's Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pushing the Centre into convening an all-party meet, probably as early as the next fortnight.</p><p align="justify">A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself.</p><p align="justify">This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget.</p><p align="justify">Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects.</p><p align="justify">The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons.</p><p align="justify">Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length.</p><p align="justify">For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the "power to define public purpose" and feels the present act is an "infringement upon the state's autonomy." UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended.</p><p align="justify">Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects.</p><p align="justify">The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, "consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted" and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. "Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem," said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, "social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects." </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Government calls all-party meet to relook on Land Acquisition Act |
-The Economic Times
A consensus at the meeting of all parties heading state governments will let the Centre amend the law in the current monsoon session itself. This revision of the land law is imperative for the Centre to execute major infrastructure projects through the public-private partnership route as envisaged in Arun Jaitley's budget. Land acquisition has come up as the single biggest hurdle for most of the new mega industrial projects. The Samajwadi Party government of Uttar Pradesh, AIADMK's in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress' in West Bengal and BJD's in Odisha, accounting for most of the non-BJP, non-Congress state governments and a chunk of votes in the Rajya Sabha where BJP is in a minority, are keen on getting the Act amended for various reasons. Many states want complete autonomy on issues of land acquisition, keeping the Centre at arm's length. For instance, West Bengal has categorically sought to have its own land acquisition policy. Tamil Nadu wants the "power to define public purpose" and feels the present act is an "infringement upon the state's autonomy." UP too has sought similar powers for the state government. Odisha, though has refrained from making political demands, is expected to go along with the Centre on getting the Act amended. Rural development minister Nitin Gadkari had organised a conference of revenue ministers of all state governments on June 27 and ET had reported on July 7 the possibility of government tweaking the Land Act to speed up key projects. The consensus that emerged at the conference of the revenue ministers of the state governments is that, "consent clause should be removed from PPP projects, the definition of affected family needs to be re-examined, autonomy for state governments, social impact assessment only for large projects, retrospective clause for compensation should be modified, penalty provisions against civil servants are too stringent, return of unutilised land to original owners to be deleted" and a few other instances of radical departure from UPA's show piece legislation that was deemed as anti-industry. Interestingly, Congress-ruled states such as Kerala slammed the central Act, while conclusively seeking state specific Acts on land acquisition. "Obtaining consent of land owners prior to preliminary notification is a herculean task as the identification of land owners at such initial stages may pose a problem," said the Kerala government's representative. Haryana wanted the consent requirement to be done away with. While Karnataka insisted, "social impact study should be compulsory only for large projects." |